| |
|
|
 | Acesso ao texto completo restrito à biblioteca da Embrapa Agrobiologia. Para informações adicionais entre em contato com cnpab.biblioteca@embrapa.br. |
|
Registro Completo |
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Agrobiologia. |
|
Data corrente: |
28/09/2022 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
28/08/2023 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
|
Autoria: |
SANTOS, C. A. dos; MONTEIRO, R. C.; HOMEM, B. G. C.; SALGADO, L. S.; CASAGRANDE, D. R.; PEREIRA, J. M.; REZENDE, C. de P; ALVES, B. J. R.; BODDEY, R. M. |
|
Afiliação: |
CAMILA ALMEIDA DOS SANTOS, UFRRJ; RAFAEL CASSADOR MONTEIRO, UFRRJ; BRUNO GROSSI COSTA HOMEM, UFLA; LUCERO SARABIA SALGADO, National Autonomous University of Mexico; DANIEL RUME CASAGRANDE, UFLA; JOSÉ MARQUES PEREIRA, CEPLAC; CLÁUDIA DE PAULA REZENDE, CEPLAC; BRUNO JOSE RODRIGUES ALVES, CNPAB; ROBERT MICHAEL BODDEY, CNPAB. |
|
Título: |
Productivity of beef cattle grazing Brachiaria brizantha cv. Marandu with and without nitrogen fertilizer application or mixed pastures with the legume Desmodium ovalifolium. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2022 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Grass and Forage Science, v. 78, n. 1, p. 147-160, 2023. |
|
ISSN: |
0142-5242 |
|
DOI: |
https://doi.org/10.1111/gfs.12581 |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
he use of forage legumes to contribute biologically fixed nitrogen (N) to pastures is an alternative to increase beef cattle production in tropical regions. The objective was to compare the impact of the introduction of a legume with that of N fertilizer application on forage and animal production in Brachiaria pastures. This two-year study assessed three pasture treatments: (1) mixed Marandu palisadegrass (Brachiaria brizantha [syn. Urochloa brizantha] cv. Marandu) and the legume ?ovalifolium? (Desmodium ovalifolium) cv. Itabela (Mixed), (2) Marandu palisadegrass pastures with 150 kg N ha−1 (Fertilized), and (3) Marandu palisadegrass without N fertilizer (Unfertilized). Rotational stocking with a variable stocking rate was used with a target herbage allowance of 1.0 kg forage kg body weight−1. The pre-grazing green herbage mass was similar for Fertilized and Mixed pastures, with 54% and 63% more mass than Unfertilized pasture, respectively (p < .001). Cattle that grazed the fertilized pasture had the greatest average daily gain (ADG; p = .017). The stocking rate and liveweight gain per area were greatest for the Fertilized and Mixed pastures (p < .001 and p < .001, respectively). No differences between treatments were found for DM forage intake (p = .555). Organic matter digestibility was lowest (p < .001) for the Mixed pasture. The inclusion of the ovalifolium legume in the Marandu pasture had the same impact on beef cattle production as annual fertilization with 150 kg N ha−1. The potential and environmental benefits of ovalifolium are discussed. Menoshe use of forage legumes to contribute biologically fixed nitrogen (N) to pastures is an alternative to increase beef cattle production in tropical regions. The objective was to compare the impact of the introduction of a legume with that of N fertilizer application on forage and animal production in Brachiaria pastures. This two-year study assessed three pasture treatments: (1) mixed Marandu palisadegrass (Brachiaria brizantha [syn. Urochloa brizantha] cv. Marandu) and the legume ?ovalifolium? (Desmodium ovalifolium) cv. Itabela (Mixed), (2) Marandu palisadegrass pastures with 150 kg N ha−1 (Fertilized), and (3) Marandu palisadegrass without N fertilizer (Unfertilized). Rotational stocking with a variable stocking rate was used with a target herbage allowance of 1.0 kg forage kg body weight−1. The pre-grazing green herbage mass was similar for Fertilized and Mixed pastures, with 54% and 63% more mass than Unfertilized pasture, respectively (p < .001). Cattle that grazed the fertilized pasture had the greatest average daily gain (ADG; p = .017). The stocking rate and liveweight gain per area were greatest for the Fertilized and Mixed pastures (p < .001 and p < .001, respectively). No differences between treatments were found for DM forage intake (p = .555). Organic matter digestibility was lowest (p < .001) for the Mixed pasture. The inclusion of the ovalifolium legume in the Marandu pasture had the same... Mostrar Tudo |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Fertilized pasture; Grona heterocarpasubp; Mixed pasture; Ovalifolium; Warm-sea beef cattle. |
|
Thesagro: |
Brachiaria. |
|
Thesaurus Nal: |
Urochloa brizantha. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
P Recursos Naturais, Ciências Ambientais e da Terra |
|
Marc: |
LEADER 02726naa a2200325 a 4500
001 2146961
005 2023-08-28
008 2022 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
022 $a0142-5242
024 7 $ahttps://doi.org/10.1111/gfs.12581$2DOI
100 1 $aSANTOS, C. A. dos
245 $aProductivity of beef cattle grazing Brachiaria brizantha cv. Marandu with and without nitrogen fertilizer application or mixed pastures with the legume Desmodium ovalifolium.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2022
520 $ahe use of forage legumes to contribute biologically fixed nitrogen (N) to pastures is an alternative to increase beef cattle production in tropical regions. The objective was to compare the impact of the introduction of a legume with that of N fertilizer application on forage and animal production in Brachiaria pastures. This two-year study assessed three pasture treatments: (1) mixed Marandu palisadegrass (Brachiaria brizantha [syn. Urochloa brizantha] cv. Marandu) and the legume ?ovalifolium? (Desmodium ovalifolium) cv. Itabela (Mixed), (2) Marandu palisadegrass pastures with 150 kg N ha−1 (Fertilized), and (3) Marandu palisadegrass without N fertilizer (Unfertilized). Rotational stocking with a variable stocking rate was used with a target herbage allowance of 1.0 kg forage kg body weight−1. The pre-grazing green herbage mass was similar for Fertilized and Mixed pastures, with 54% and 63% more mass than Unfertilized pasture, respectively (p < .001). Cattle that grazed the fertilized pasture had the greatest average daily gain (ADG; p = .017). The stocking rate and liveweight gain per area were greatest for the Fertilized and Mixed pastures (p < .001 and p < .001, respectively). No differences between treatments were found for DM forage intake (p = .555). Organic matter digestibility was lowest (p < .001) for the Mixed pasture. The inclusion of the ovalifolium legume in the Marandu pasture had the same impact on beef cattle production as annual fertilization with 150 kg N ha−1. The potential and environmental benefits of ovalifolium are discussed.
650 $aUrochloa brizantha
650 $aBrachiaria
653 $aFertilized pasture
653 $aGrona heterocarpasubp
653 $aMixed pasture
653 $aOvalifolium
653 $aWarm-sea beef cattle
700 1 $aMONTEIRO, R. C.
700 1 $aHOMEM, B. G. C.
700 1 $aSALGADO, L. S.
700 1 $aCASAGRANDE, D. R.
700 1 $aPEREIRA, J. M.
700 1 $aREZENDE, C. de P
700 1 $aALVES, B. J. R.
700 1 $aBODDEY, R. M.
773 $tGrass and Forage Science$gv. 78, n. 1, p. 147-160, 2023.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Agrobiologia (CNPAB) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
URL |
Voltar
|
|
|
| Acesso ao texto completo restrito à biblioteca da Embrapa Meio Ambiente. Para informações adicionais entre em contato com cnpma.biblioteca@embrapa.br. |
Registro Completo
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Meio Ambiente. |
|
Data corrente: |
24/01/2018 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
30/10/2019 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
|
Circulação/Nível: |
A - 2 |
|
Autoria: |
PITOMBO, L. M.; CANTARELLA, H.; PACKER, A. P.; RAMOS, N. P.; CARMO, J. B. do. |
|
Afiliação: |
LEONARDO MACHADO PITOMBO, IAC; HEITOR CANTARELLA, IAC; ANA PAULA CONTADOR PACKER, CNPMA; NILZA PATRICIA RAMOS, CNPMA; JANAINA BRAGA DO CARMO, UFSCar. |
|
Título: |
Straw preservation reduced total N2O emissions from a sugarcane field. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2017 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Soil Use and Management, v. 33, n. 4, p. 583-594, 2017. |
|
DOI: |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/sum.12384 |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
Post-harvest biomass can be used as feedstock for energy production and alter N2O emissions from the soil, which is among the main issues determining bioethanol sustainability. To assess the effects of sugarcane straw return on gas emissions, we established a field experiment in which 0, 50, 75 or 100% (0, 5.65, 8.47 and 11.30 Mg/ha dry biomass, respectively) of the crop residues (straw) was left in the field during the first two ratoon crops. As fertilizer is applied in bands to sugarcane, we also investigated the contribution of different positions to the N2O emissions within the field. There was an interactive effect between straw and inorganic fertilizer, leading to a nonlinear effect of crop residues on the fertilizer emission factor (EF). However, straw consistently reduced N2O emissions from the field, acting mainly in the unfertilized areas in the field (P < 0.05). We observed that considering the typical EF used in the literature, the N2O-N emissions attributed to fertilizer ranged from 0.19 to 0.79 kg/ha, while the total emissions ranged from 3.3 to 5.2 kg/ha, from the highest amount of straw to the lowest. We conclude that overall, the fertilizer EF is not as relevant as the total emissions, based on this and other studies. Consequently, management practices might be more effective in improving the GHG balance than changing inorganic fertilizer use. We conclude that keeping up to 11 Mg/ha of straw with a large C:N ratio (>100:1) on site might increase sugarcane production sustainability by reducing the greenhouse gas emissions from the field. MenosPost-harvest biomass can be used as feedstock for energy production and alter N2O emissions from the soil, which is among the main issues determining bioethanol sustainability. To assess the effects of sugarcane straw return on gas emissions, we established a field experiment in which 0, 50, 75 or 100% (0, 5.65, 8.47 and 11.30 Mg/ha dry biomass, respectively) of the crop residues (straw) was left in the field during the first two ratoon crops. As fertilizer is applied in bands to sugarcane, we also investigated the contribution of different positions to the N2O emissions within the field. There was an interactive effect between straw and inorganic fertilizer, leading to a nonlinear effect of crop residues on the fertilizer emission factor (EF). However, straw consistently reduced N2O emissions from the field, acting mainly in the unfertilized areas in the field (P < 0.05). We observed that considering the typical EF used in the literature, the N2O-N emissions attributed to fertilizer ranged from 0.19 to 0.79 kg/ha, while the total emissions ranged from 3.3 to 5.2 kg/ha, from the highest amount of straw to the lowest. We conclude that overall, the fertilizer EF is not as relevant as the total emissions, based on this and other studies. Consequently, management practices might be more effective in improving the GHG balance than changing inorganic fertilizer use. We conclude that keeping up to 11 Mg/ha of straw with a large C:N ratio (>100:1) on site might increase sugarcane pr... Mostrar Tudo |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Emissão de gasesNitrogen; Óxido nitroso; Sustainability. |
|
Thesagro: |
Cana de açúcar; Nitrogênio; Palha. |
|
Thesaurus NAL: |
bioenergy; Greenhouse gas emissions; Nitrous oxide; soil; Straw; Sugarcane. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
P Recursos Naturais, Ciências Ambientais e da Terra |
|
Marc: |
LEADER 02488naa a2200325 a 4500
001 2086266
005 2019-10-30
008 2017 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
024 7 $ahttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/sum.12384$2DOI
100 1 $aPITOMBO, L. M.
245 $aStraw preservation reduced total N2O emissions from a sugarcane field.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2017
520 $aPost-harvest biomass can be used as feedstock for energy production and alter N2O emissions from the soil, which is among the main issues determining bioethanol sustainability. To assess the effects of sugarcane straw return on gas emissions, we established a field experiment in which 0, 50, 75 or 100% (0, 5.65, 8.47 and 11.30 Mg/ha dry biomass, respectively) of the crop residues (straw) was left in the field during the first two ratoon crops. As fertilizer is applied in bands to sugarcane, we also investigated the contribution of different positions to the N2O emissions within the field. There was an interactive effect between straw and inorganic fertilizer, leading to a nonlinear effect of crop residues on the fertilizer emission factor (EF). However, straw consistently reduced N2O emissions from the field, acting mainly in the unfertilized areas in the field (P < 0.05). We observed that considering the typical EF used in the literature, the N2O-N emissions attributed to fertilizer ranged from 0.19 to 0.79 kg/ha, while the total emissions ranged from 3.3 to 5.2 kg/ha, from the highest amount of straw to the lowest. We conclude that overall, the fertilizer EF is not as relevant as the total emissions, based on this and other studies. Consequently, management practices might be more effective in improving the GHG balance than changing inorganic fertilizer use. We conclude that keeping up to 11 Mg/ha of straw with a large C:N ratio (>100:1) on site might increase sugarcane production sustainability by reducing the greenhouse gas emissions from the field.
650 $abioenergy
650 $aGreenhouse gas emissions
650 $aNitrous oxide
650 $asoil
650 $aStraw
650 $aSugarcane
650 $aCana de açúcar
650 $aNitrogênio
650 $aPalha
653 $aEmissão de gasesNitrogen
653 $aÓxido nitroso
653 $aSustainability
700 1 $aCANTARELLA, H.
700 1 $aPACKER, A. P.
700 1 $aRAMOS, N. P.
700 1 $aCARMO, J. B. do
773 $tSoil Use and Management$gv. 33, n. 4, p. 583-594, 2017.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Meio Ambiente (CNPMA) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
| Expressão de busca inválida. Verifique!!! |
|
|
