| |
|
|
|
Registro Completo |
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Hortaliças. |
|
Data corrente: |
24/07/2006 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
24/07/2006 |
|
Autoria: |
BRAGA SOBRINHO, R.; GUIMARÃES, J. A.; AZEVEDO, F. R. de; MESQUITA, A. L. M. |
|
Título: |
A mosca minadora do meloeiro nos pólos de produção de melão dos Estados do Ceará e Rio Grande do Norte. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2006 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
In: SEMINÁRIO BRASILEIRO DE PRODUÇÃO INTEGRADA DE FRUTAS, 8., 2006, Vitória. Anais... Vitória: INCAPER, 2006. |
|
Páginas: |
p. 202. |
|
Idioma: |
Português |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Controle. |
|
Thesagro: |
Cucumis Melo; Inseto; Liriomyza Trifolii; Melão; Mosca Minadora; Praga. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
-- |
|
Marc: |
LEADER 00749naa a2200241 a 4500
001 1779289
005 2006-07-24
008 2006 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
100 1 $aBRAGA SOBRINHO, R.
245 $aA mosca minadora do meloeiro nos pólos de produção de melão dos Estados do Ceará e Rio Grande do Norte.
260 $c2006
300 $ap. 202.
650 $aCucumis Melo
650 $aInseto
650 $aLiriomyza Trifolii
650 $aMelão
650 $aMosca Minadora
650 $aPraga
653 $aControle
700 1 $aGUIMARÃES, J. A.
700 1 $aAZEVEDO, F. R. de
700 1 $aMESQUITA, A. L. M.
773 $tIn: SEMINÁRIO BRASILEIRO DE PRODUÇÃO INTEGRADA DE FRUTAS, 8., 2006, Vitória. Anais... Vitória: INCAPER, 2006.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Hortaliças (CNPH) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
URL |
Voltar
|
|
|
Registro Completo
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Amapá. |
|
Data corrente: |
10/08/2017 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
18/10/2022 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
|
Circulação/Nível: |
B - 2 |
|
Autoria: |
PANTOJA, W. M. F.; NEVES, L.; DIAS, M. R.; MARINHO, R. G. B.; MONTAGNER, D.; TAVARES-DIAS, M. |
|
Afiliação: |
WANDERSON MICHEL FARIAS PANTOJA, Estagiário CPAF-AP; LIGIA NEVES, Estagiária CPAF-AP; MÁRCIA KELLY REIS DIAS, Unifap; RENATA DAS GRAÇAS BARBOSA MARINHO, Unifap; DANIEL MONTAGNER, CPAF-AP; MARCOS TAVARES DIAS, CPAF-AP. |
|
Título: |
Protozoan and metazoan parasites of Nile tilapia Oreochromis niloticus cultured in Brazil. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2012 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Revista MVZ Córdoba, v. 17, n. 1, p. 2812-2819, 2012. |
|
DOI: |
https://doi.org/10.21897/rmvz.248 |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
This study describes the parasitic fauna and relative condition factor (Kn) in Nile tilapia Oreochromis niloticus L. (Cichlidae) from fish farms in the State of Amapá. Material and methods. 123 fish from four fish farms in the state of Amapá, Brazil were necropsied for parasitological and Kn analysis. Results. 64.2% of the examined fish, had the gills infected with Cichlidogyrus tilapiae Paperna, 1960 (Monogenoidea: Dactylogyridae); Ichthyophthirius multifiliis Fouquet, 1876 (Protozoa: Ciliophora), Trichodina Ehrenberg, 1830 and Paratrichodina africana Kazubski & El-Tantawy, 1986 (Protozoa: Trichodinidae). The highest prevalence found corresponded to Monogenoidea C. tilapiae while the lowest corresponded to Trichodinidae. However, I. multifiliis was the parasite that presented the greatest intensity and abundance. The differences found in the infection rates of the different fish farms due to causes further discussed. The parasitism did not influence the relative condition factor (Kn) of fish. This was the first record of P. africana in Brazil and occurred in the Eastern Amazon. Conclusions. In Brazil, Lamproglena sp. is an emerging parasite in the Southern and Southeastern regions, but this crustacean was not found in the Nile tilapia in the State of Amapá. The parasitic infections in Nile tilapia farmed in Brazil are caused by protozoan, monogenoidea, crustacea and digenea species, and the regional differences on their prevalence and intensity rates are discussed in this study. MenosThis study describes the parasitic fauna and relative condition factor (Kn) in Nile tilapia Oreochromis niloticus L. (Cichlidae) from fish farms in the State of Amapá. Material and methods. 123 fish from four fish farms in the state of Amapá, Brazil were necropsied for parasitological and Kn analysis. Results. 64.2% of the examined fish, had the gills infected with Cichlidogyrus tilapiae Paperna, 1960 (Monogenoidea: Dactylogyridae); Ichthyophthirius multifiliis Fouquet, 1876 (Protozoa: Ciliophora), Trichodina Ehrenberg, 1830 and Paratrichodina africana Kazubski & El-Tantawy, 1986 (Protozoa: Trichodinidae). The highest prevalence found corresponded to Monogenoidea C. tilapiae while the lowest corresponded to Trichodinidae. However, I. multifiliis was the parasite that presented the greatest intensity and abundance. The differences found in the infection rates of the different fish farms due to causes further discussed. The parasitism did not influence the relative condition factor (Kn) of fish. This was the first record of P. africana in Brazil and occurred in the Eastern Amazon. Conclusions. In Brazil, Lamproglena sp. is an emerging parasite in the Southern and Southeastern regions, but this crustacean was not found in the Nile tilapia in the State of Amapá. The parasitic infections in Nile tilapia farmed in Brazil are caused by protozoan, monogenoidea, crustacea and digenea species, and the regional differences on their prevalence and intensity rates are discussed in this s... Mostrar Tudo |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Animal parasite; Freshwater fishe; Parasito animal. |
|
Thesagro: |
Peixe de água doce. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
S Ciências Biológicas |
|
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/item/162626/1/AP-2012-Protozoan-and-metazoan-parasite-Tilapia.pdf
|
|
Marc: |
LEADER 02241naa a2200241 a 4500
001 2073885
005 2022-10-18
008 2012 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
024 7 $ahttps://doi.org/10.21897/rmvz.248$2DOI
100 1 $aPANTOJA, W. M. F.
245 $aProtozoan and metazoan parasites of Nile tilapia Oreochromis niloticus cultured in Brazil.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2012
520 $aThis study describes the parasitic fauna and relative condition factor (Kn) in Nile tilapia Oreochromis niloticus L. (Cichlidae) from fish farms in the State of Amapá. Material and methods. 123 fish from four fish farms in the state of Amapá, Brazil were necropsied for parasitological and Kn analysis. Results. 64.2% of the examined fish, had the gills infected with Cichlidogyrus tilapiae Paperna, 1960 (Monogenoidea: Dactylogyridae); Ichthyophthirius multifiliis Fouquet, 1876 (Protozoa: Ciliophora), Trichodina Ehrenberg, 1830 and Paratrichodina africana Kazubski & El-Tantawy, 1986 (Protozoa: Trichodinidae). The highest prevalence found corresponded to Monogenoidea C. tilapiae while the lowest corresponded to Trichodinidae. However, I. multifiliis was the parasite that presented the greatest intensity and abundance. The differences found in the infection rates of the different fish farms due to causes further discussed. The parasitism did not influence the relative condition factor (Kn) of fish. This was the first record of P. africana in Brazil and occurred in the Eastern Amazon. Conclusions. In Brazil, Lamproglena sp. is an emerging parasite in the Southern and Southeastern regions, but this crustacean was not found in the Nile tilapia in the State of Amapá. The parasitic infections in Nile tilapia farmed in Brazil are caused by protozoan, monogenoidea, crustacea and digenea species, and the regional differences on their prevalence and intensity rates are discussed in this study.
650 $aPeixe de água doce
653 $aAnimal parasite
653 $aFreshwater fishe
653 $aParasito animal
700 1 $aNEVES, L.
700 1 $aDIAS, M. R.
700 1 $aMARINHO, R. G. B.
700 1 $aMONTAGNER, D.
700 1 $aTAVARES-DIAS, M.
773 $tRevista MVZ Córdoba$gv. 17, n. 1, p. 2812-2819, 2012.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Amapá (CPAF-AP) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
| Expressão de busca inválida. Verifique!!! |
|
|
