| |
|
|
|
Registro Completo |
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Agrossilvipastoril; Embrapa Milho e Sorgo. |
|
Data corrente: |
15/08/2014 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
15/08/2014 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Anais de Congresso |
|
Autoria: |
SILVA, A. F. da; TARDIN, F. D.; JOANELLA, G. K.; FILIMBERTI, E. F. L.; BEHLING, M.; GONTIJO NETO, M. M. |
|
Afiliação: |
ALEXANDRE FERREIRA DA SILVA, CNPMS; FLAVIO DESSAUNE TARDIN, CNPMS; GABRIELA KLEIN JOANELLA, UFMT.; EDUARDO FELIPE LOPES FILIMBERTI, UFMT.; MAUREL BEHLING, UFMT.; MIGUEL MARQUES GONTIJO NETO, CNPMS. |
|
Título: |
Influência da época e densidade de plantas na produtividade de cultivares de milho safrinha, no município de Sinop-MT. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2014 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
In: CONGRESSO NACIONAL DE MILHO E SORGO, 30.; SIMPÓSIO SOBRE LEPDÓPTEROS COMUNS A MILHO, SOJA E ALGODÃO, 1., 2014, Salvador. Eficiência nas cadeias produtivas e o abastecimento global: resumos expandidos. Sete Lagoas: Associação Brasileira de Milho e Sorgo, 2014. |
|
Descrição Física: |
1 CD-ROM. |
|
Idioma: |
Português |
|
Conteúdo: |
O manejo de densidade de plantas é uma das práticas culturais mais importantes para determinar o rendimento de grãos. A escolha do melhor estande poderá variar em função da época de semeadura e da cultivar utilizada. Objetivou-se com o trabalho avaliar do rendimento híbridos comerciais de milho, cultivados sob diferentes densidades em três épocas de semeadura no período da safrinha. O delineamento experimental utilizado foi o de blocos ao acaso, com quatro repetições, em esquema fatorial 3 (cultivares) x 4 (população de plantas) x 3 (épocas de semeadura). As cultivares corresponderam a três híbridos simples precoces: BRS 1060, P30F53H e DKB390PRO, as populações de plantas utilizadas foram de 40.000, 50.000, 60.000 e 75.000 plantas ha -1 , já as épocas de semeadura ocorreram nas datas de 11/02, 01/03 e 15/03. Ao final do ciclo da cultura, em cada uma das épocas semeadas, avaliou-se a produtividade de grãos. Os genótipos apresentam diferentes estabilidades de produção. DKB390PRO apresenta melhor estabilidade de rendimento do que os demais. A produtividade de grãos é significativamente influenciada pela densidade de plantas, sendo recomendadas densidades iguais ou superiores a 50.000 plantas ha -1 , dependendo da época de semeadura. Plantios mais tardios no período da safrinha resultam em menor produtividade. |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Arranjo de plantas; Segunda safra. |
|
Thesagro: |
Zea Mays. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
-- |
|
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/item/106664/1/Influencia-epoca.pdf
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/item/116299/1/cpamt-2014-behling-influencia-epoca-densidade-milho-safrinha-mt.pdf
|
|
Marc: |
LEADER 02254nam a2200217 a 4500
001 1992653
005 2014-08-15
008 2014 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
100 1 $aSILVA, A. F. da
245 $aInfluência da época e densidade de plantas na produtividade de cultivares de milho safrinha, no município de Sinop-MT.$h[electronic resource]
260 $aIn: CONGRESSO NACIONAL DE MILHO E SORGO, 30.; SIMPÓSIO SOBRE LEPDÓPTEROS COMUNS A MILHO, SOJA E ALGODÃO, 1., 2014, Salvador. Eficiência nas cadeias produtivas e o abastecimento global: resumos expandidos. Sete Lagoas: Associação Brasileira de Milho e Sorgo$c2014
300 $c1 CD-ROM.
520 $aO manejo de densidade de plantas é uma das práticas culturais mais importantes para determinar o rendimento de grãos. A escolha do melhor estande poderá variar em função da época de semeadura e da cultivar utilizada. Objetivou-se com o trabalho avaliar do rendimento híbridos comerciais de milho, cultivados sob diferentes densidades em três épocas de semeadura no período da safrinha. O delineamento experimental utilizado foi o de blocos ao acaso, com quatro repetições, em esquema fatorial 3 (cultivares) x 4 (população de plantas) x 3 (épocas de semeadura). As cultivares corresponderam a três híbridos simples precoces: BRS 1060, P30F53H e DKB390PRO, as populações de plantas utilizadas foram de 40.000, 50.000, 60.000 e 75.000 plantas ha -1 , já as épocas de semeadura ocorreram nas datas de 11/02, 01/03 e 15/03. Ao final do ciclo da cultura, em cada uma das épocas semeadas, avaliou-se a produtividade de grãos. Os genótipos apresentam diferentes estabilidades de produção. DKB390PRO apresenta melhor estabilidade de rendimento do que os demais. A produtividade de grãos é significativamente influenciada pela densidade de plantas, sendo recomendadas densidades iguais ou superiores a 50.000 plantas ha -1 , dependendo da época de semeadura. Plantios mais tardios no período da safrinha resultam em menor produtividade.
650 $aZea Mays
653 $aArranjo de plantas
653 $aSegunda safra
700 1 $aTARDIN, F. D.
700 1 $aJOANELLA, G. K.
700 1 $aFILIMBERTI, E. F. L.
700 1 $aBEHLING, M.
700 1 $aGONTIJO NETO, M. M.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Milho e Sorgo (CNPMS) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
URL |
Voltar
|
|
|
Registro Completo
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Agrossilvipastoril. |
|
Data corrente: |
06/12/2021 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
06/12/2021 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Resumo em Anais de Congresso |
|
Autoria: |
MATOS, B. F. de; ARAÚJO, G. P. de; BEHLING NETO, A.; WRUCK, F. J.; OLIVEIRA JUNIOR, O. L. de; PEDREIRA, B. C. e. |
|
Afiliação: |
BETANIA FLORENCIO DE MATOS, UFMT, Sinop-MT; GRAZIELA PAULA DE ARAÚJO, UFMT, Sinop-MT; ARTHUR BEHLING NETO, UFMT, Sinop-MT; FLAVIO JESUS WRUCK, CPAMT; ORLANDO LUCIO DE OLIVEIRA JUNIOR, CPAMT; BRUNO CARNEIRO E PEDREIRA, CPAMT. |
|
Título: |
The effect of the harvesting frequency on the residual forage mass in mixed pastures. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2021 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
In: REUNIÃO ANUAL DA SOCIEDADE BRASILEIRA DE ZOOTECNIA, 56., 2021, Florianópolis. Animal science: challenges in production and sustainability: proceedings... Brasília, DF: Sociedade Brasileira de Zootecnia, 2021. p. 108. |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Notas: |
Evento virtual. |
|
Conteúdo: |
The use of different forage species in a mixed pasture is recommended to improve forage mass and soil characteristics. However, the frequency of harvest (e.g.; grazing or hay) can increase the forage removal during the off-season, and affect the residual forage mass to the following crop, especially in the non-till crop-livestock systems. We aimed to assess the harvest frequency effect in a mixed pasture compounded by Urochloa ruziziensis, pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan ?Super N?); Sunflower (Helianthus annuus), and Buckwheat (Fagopyrum esculentum) on the residual forage mass at the Embrapa Agrossilvipastoril, in Sinop, MT, Brazil. The mixed were planted on March 10, 2020, after the soybean harvest. The experimental design was a randomized complete block design with three replicates. The treatments were four harvest frequencies. The harvesting frequencies were: Straw ? no-harvest during the off-season; Lax - with one harvest (at 115 days after planting); Moderate - two harvests (80 and 115 days after planting); and Heavy - three harvests (45, 80, and 115 days after The plots were harvested at 20-cm stubble height and there were not fertilized. On September 30, 2020, forage mass was harvested using three quadrats (0.5 m2) per plot, at soil level, to calculate residual forage mass, which was desiccated (4 L ha-1 of glyphosate) on October 23, 2020. The soybean (BG4781, Brevant) was seeded on November 07, when 88 kg of P2O5 was applied. On December 01, 68 kg of K surface-applied. The crop management practices (e.g.; herbicide, insecticide, and fungicide) were similar to all plots, and on March 09, 2021, the soybean was harvested (data not showed). The residual forage mass was affected by the harvesting frequency (P=0.0296). The greatest residual forage mass was measured in the treatment where there was no harvesting (straw), on average 5625 kg DM ha-1. On the other hand, lax, moderate and heavy treatments presented similar residual forage mass (on average, 3000 kg DM ha-1). We concluded that although the residual forage mass was reduced when the off-season pastures were harvested, the number of harvest events did not affect the forage mass left on the field to assure the non-till cropping system. It is important to mention the soybean grain yield needs to be measured in the following crop season to understand the effect of the harvesting frequency during the off-season. MenosThe use of different forage species in a mixed pasture is recommended to improve forage mass and soil characteristics. However, the frequency of harvest (e.g.; grazing or hay) can increase the forage removal during the off-season, and affect the residual forage mass to the following crop, especially in the non-till crop-livestock systems. We aimed to assess the harvest frequency effect in a mixed pasture compounded by Urochloa ruziziensis, pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan ?Super N?); Sunflower (Helianthus annuus), and Buckwheat (Fagopyrum esculentum) on the residual forage mass at the Embrapa Agrossilvipastoril, in Sinop, MT, Brazil. The mixed were planted on March 10, 2020, after the soybean harvest. The experimental design was a randomized complete block design with three replicates. The treatments were four harvest frequencies. The harvesting frequencies were: Straw ? no-harvest during the off-season; Lax - with one harvest (at 115 days after planting); Moderate - two harvests (80 and 115 days after planting); and Heavy - three harvests (45, 80, and 115 days after The plots were harvested at 20-cm stubble height and there were not fertilized. On September 30, 2020, forage mass was harvested using three quadrats (0.5 m2) per plot, at soil level, to calculate residual forage mass, which was desiccated (4 L ha-1 of glyphosate) on October 23, 2020. The soybean (BG4781, Brevant) was seeded on November 07, when 88 kg of P2O5 was applied. On December 01, 68 kg of K surface-applied. The... Mostrar Tudo |
|
Thesagro: |
Colheita; Forragem; Fungicida; Herbicida; Inseticida; Pastagem Mista. |
|
Thesaurus NAL: |
Cropping systems; Helianthus; Livestock; Urochloa ruziziensis. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
F Plantas e Produtos de Origem Vegetal |
|
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/item/228583/1/2021-cpamt-bcp-effects-harvesting-frequency-residual-forage-mass-mixed-pasture.pdf
|
|
Marc: |
LEADER 03432nam a2200301 a 4500
001 2137189
005 2021-12-06
008 2021 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
100 1 $aMATOS, B. F. de
245 $aThe effect of the harvesting frequency on the residual forage mass in mixed pastures.$h[electronic resource]
260 $aIn: REUNIÃO ANUAL DA SOCIEDADE BRASILEIRA DE ZOOTECNIA, 56., 2021, Florianópolis. Animal science: challenges in production and sustainability: proceedings... Brasília, DF: Sociedade Brasileira de Zootecnia, 2021. p. 108.$c2021
500 $aEvento virtual.
520 $aThe use of different forage species in a mixed pasture is recommended to improve forage mass and soil characteristics. However, the frequency of harvest (e.g.; grazing or hay) can increase the forage removal during the off-season, and affect the residual forage mass to the following crop, especially in the non-till crop-livestock systems. We aimed to assess the harvest frequency effect in a mixed pasture compounded by Urochloa ruziziensis, pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan ?Super N?); Sunflower (Helianthus annuus), and Buckwheat (Fagopyrum esculentum) on the residual forage mass at the Embrapa Agrossilvipastoril, in Sinop, MT, Brazil. The mixed were planted on March 10, 2020, after the soybean harvest. The experimental design was a randomized complete block design with three replicates. The treatments were four harvest frequencies. The harvesting frequencies were: Straw ? no-harvest during the off-season; Lax - with one harvest (at 115 days after planting); Moderate - two harvests (80 and 115 days after planting); and Heavy - three harvests (45, 80, and 115 days after The plots were harvested at 20-cm stubble height and there were not fertilized. On September 30, 2020, forage mass was harvested using three quadrats (0.5 m2) per plot, at soil level, to calculate residual forage mass, which was desiccated (4 L ha-1 of glyphosate) on October 23, 2020. The soybean (BG4781, Brevant) was seeded on November 07, when 88 kg of P2O5 was applied. On December 01, 68 kg of K surface-applied. The crop management practices (e.g.; herbicide, insecticide, and fungicide) were similar to all plots, and on March 09, 2021, the soybean was harvested (data not showed). The residual forage mass was affected by the harvesting frequency (P=0.0296). The greatest residual forage mass was measured in the treatment where there was no harvesting (straw), on average 5625 kg DM ha-1. On the other hand, lax, moderate and heavy treatments presented similar residual forage mass (on average, 3000 kg DM ha-1). We concluded that although the residual forage mass was reduced when the off-season pastures were harvested, the number of harvest events did not affect the forage mass left on the field to assure the non-till cropping system. It is important to mention the soybean grain yield needs to be measured in the following crop season to understand the effect of the harvesting frequency during the off-season.
650 $aCropping systems
650 $aHelianthus
650 $aLivestock
650 $aUrochloa ruziziensis
650 $aColheita
650 $aForragem
650 $aFungicida
650 $aHerbicida
650 $aInseticida
650 $aPastagem Mista
700 1 $aARAÚJO, G. P. de
700 1 $aBEHLING NETO, A.
700 1 $aWRUCK, F. J.
700 1 $aOLIVEIRA JUNIOR, O. L. de
700 1 $aPEDREIRA, B. C. e
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Agrossilvipastoril (CPAMT) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
| Expressão de busca inválida. Verifique!!! |
|
|
