Data/hora: 08/06/2024 04:27:56

Biblioteca(s): 	Embrapa Pecuária Sul.	
Data corrente: 	28/11/2011	
Data da última atualização: 	15/02/2012	
Autoria: 	LACA, E. A.; GENRO, T. C. M.; GENRO NETO, J. S.	
Afiliação: 	EMILIO ANDRÉS LACA, University of California Davis, CA, USA; TERESA CRISTINA MORAES GENRO, CPPSUL; JAIRO SILVEIRA GENRO NETO, Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, RS, Brasil.	
Título: 	Bayesian hierarchical models to improve estimation of diet composition by alkane profiles.	
Ano de publicação: 	2011	
Fonte/Imprenta: 	In: REUNIÓN DE LA ASOCIACIÓN LATINOAMERICANA DE PRODUCCIÓN ANIMAL, 22., 2011, Montevideo, Uruguay. Memorias... Montevideo: Asociación Uruguaya de Producción Animal, 2011.	
Descrição Física: 	1 CD-ROM.	
Idioma: 	Inglês	
Conteúdo: 	Alkane profiles in forage and feces are used to determine diet composition, essentially by inverting a linear mixing equation. Depending on the number of dietary components, number of alkanes and difference in forage profiles, the linear equations can be over or underdetermined. We compared the typical non-negative least squares (NNLS) method against a novel Bayesian hierarchical model (BHM) where diet composition is represented as latent variables modeled with parameters shared by the models for fecal and forage profiles. Forage and fecal profiles were obtained from steers grazing either Brachiaria brizantha cv Marandu, Panicum maximum cv. Mombaça, or Pennisetum purpureum cv. Cameroon at Embrapa Beef Cattle, Campo Grande, MS, Brazil. Herbage and fecal samples were collected in the dry and early wet seasons. Herbage was sampled by 20-cm horizons sorted into stem/sheath and leaf blade as dietary components. Feces were collected from 6 animals in the morning and afternoon. Fecal profiles were corrected by faecal recoveries using mean values from the literature. Distributions of diets estimated by NNLS were obtained by Monte Carlo simulation of profiles using parameters and covariance matrices estimated from data. The BHM yielded posterior distributions directly by using Monte Carlo Markov Chains. NNLS resulted in highly variables diets with distributions that were clearly non-normal. BHM resulted in quasi-normal posterior distributions. We conclude that both approaches are better than the normal approach where diet covariances are calculated ad-hoc. The BHM method has the potential to be vastly superior because it allows the simultaneous integration in a formally correct manner, however, convergence can be difficult.	
Palavras-Chave: 	Melhoramento forrageira; Modelo bayesiano; Perfil alcalino.	
Categoria do assunto: 	K Ciência Florestal e Produtos de Origem Vegetal	
URL: 	http://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/item/48108/1/G158-pagina173poster.pdf	
Registro original: 	Embrapa Pecuária Sul (CPPSUL)	
Exemplares: 	CPPSUL - (12256-1) - UPC - RA - DD -  -  -  - DIS