|
|
| Acesso ao texto completo restrito à biblioteca da Embrapa Florestas. Para informações adicionais entre em contato com cnpf.biblioteca@embrapa.br. |
Registro Completo |
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Florestas. |
Data corrente: |
25/11/2019 |
Data da última atualização: |
27/04/2020 |
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
Autoria: |
THAKUR, M. P.; PHILLIPS, H. R. P.; BROSE, U.; VRIES, F. T. de; LAVELLE, P.; LOREAU, M.; MATHIEU, J.; MULDER, C.; PUTTEN, W. H. V. D.; RILLIG, M. C.; WARDLE, D. A.; BACH, E. M.; BARTZ, M. L. C.; BENNETT, J. M.; BRIONES, M. J. I.; BROWN, G. G.; DECAENS, T.; EISENHAUER, N.; FERLIAN, O.; GUERRA, C. A.; KONIG-RIES, B.; ORGIAZZI, A.; RAMIREZ, K. S.; RUSSELL, D. J.; RUTGERS, M.; WALL, D. H.; CAMERON, E. K. |
Afiliação: |
NETHERLANDS INSTITUTE OF ECOLOGY (NIOO-KNAW), WAGENINGEN, GELDERLAND, THE NETHERLANDS; NETHERLANDS INSTITUTE OF ECOLOGY (NIOO-KNAW), WAGENINGEN, GELDERLAND, THE NETHERLANDS; NETHERLANDS INSTITUTE OF ECOLOGY (NIOO-KNAW), WAGENINGEN, GELDERLAND, THE NETHERLANDS; SCHOOL OF EARTH AND ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES, THE UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER, MANCHESTER; SORBONNE UNIVERSITE, CNRS, UPEC, PARIS, ILE-DE-FRANCE; CENTRE FOR BIODIVERSITY THEORY AND MODELLING, THEORETICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL ECOLOGY STATION, CNRS AND PAUL SABATIER UNIVERSITY, MOULIS, OCCITANIE, FRANCE; SORBONNE UNIVERSITE, CNRS, UPEC, PARIS, ILE-DE-FRANCE, FRANCE; DEPARTMENT BIOLOGICAL, GEOLOGICAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES, UNIVERSITY OF CATANIA, CATANIA, SICILY, ITALY; DEPARTMENT OF TERRESTRIAL ECOLOGY, NETHERLANDS INSTITUTE OF ECOLOGY (NIOO-KNAW), WAGENINGEN, GELDERLAND, THE NETHERLANDS; FREIE UNIVERSITAT BERLIN, INSTITUTE OF BIOLOGY, BERLIN, GERMANY; ASIAN SCHOOL FOR THE ENVIRONMENT, NANYANG TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY, SINGAPORE, SINGAPORE; DEPARTMENT OF BIOLOGY AND SCHOOL OF GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY, COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY, FORT COLLINS, CO USA; CENTER OF FUNCTIONAL ECOLOGY, DEPARTMENT OF LIFE SCIENCES, UNIVERSITY OF COIMBRA, COIMBRA, CENTRO, PORTUGAL; GERMAN CENTRE FOR INTEGRATIVE BIODIVERSITY RESEARCH (IDIV), HALLE-JENA-LEIPZIG, LEIPZIG, SAXONY, GERMANY; UNIVERSIDADE POSITIVO; GEORGE GARDNER BROWN, CNPF; CENTRE D'ECOLOGIE FONCTIONNELLE ET EVOLUTIVE (CEFE UMR 5175, CNRS - UNIVERSITE DE MONTPELLIER, UNIVERSITE PAUL-VALERY MONTPELLIER - EPHE), MONTPELLIER, OCCITANIE, FRANCE; GERMAN CENTRE FOR INTEGRATIVE BIODIVERSITY RESEARCH (IDIV), HALLE-JENA-LEIPZIG, LEIPZIG, SAXONY, GERMANY; GERMAN CENTRE FOR INTEGRATIVE BIODIVERSITY RESEARCH (IDIV), HALLE-JENA-LEIPZIG, LEIPZIG, SAXONY, GERMANY; GERMAN CENTRE FOR INTEGRATIVE BIODIVERSITY RESEARCH (IDIV), HALLE-JENA-LEIPZIG, LEIPZIG, SAXONY, GERMANY; GERMAN CENTRE FOR INTEGRATIVE BIODIVERSITY RESEARCH (IDIV), HALLE-JENA-LEIPZIG, LEIPZIG, SAXONY, GERMANY; EUROPEAN COMMISSION, JOINT RESEARCH CENTRE (JRC), SUSTAINABLE RESOURCES DIRECTORATE, ISPRA, VARESE ITALY; DEPARTMENT OF TERRESTRIAL ECOLOGY, NETHERLANDS INSTITUTE OF ECOLOGY (NIOO-KNAW), WAGENINGEN, GELDERLAND, THE NETHERLANDS; SENCKENBERG MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY GORLITZ, GOERLITZ, SAXONY, GERMANY; NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC HEALTH AND THE ENVIRONMENT, BILTHOVEN, UTRECHT, THE NETHERLANDS; DEPARTMENT OF BIOLOGY AND SCHOOL OF GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY, COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY, FORT COLLINS, CO USA; FACULTY OF BIOLOGICAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES, UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI, HELSINKI, UUSIMAA, FINLAND. |
Título: |
Towards an integrative understanding of soil biodiversity. |
Ano de publicação: |
2020 |
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Biological Reviews, v. 9, n. 2, p. 350-364, Apr. 2020. |
DOI: |
10.1111/brv.12567 |
Idioma: |
Inglês |
Conteúdo: |
Soil is one of the most biodiverse terrestrial habitats. Yet, we lack an integrative conceptual framework for understanding the patterns and mechanisms driving soil biodiversity. One of the underlying reasons for our poor understanding of soil biodiversity patterns relates to whether key biodiversity theories (historically developed for aboveground and aquatic organisms) are applicable to patterns of soil biodiversity. Here, we present a systematic literature review to investigate whether and how key biodiversity theories (species?energy relationship, theory of island biogeography, metacommunity theory, niche theory and neutral theory) can explain observed patterns of soil biodiversity. We then discuss two spatial compartments nested within soil at which biodiversity theories can be applied to acknowledge the scale-dependent nature of soil biodiversity. |
Thesagro: |
Biologia do Solo; Estrutura do Solo. |
Thesaurus Nal: |
Biodiversity; Biogeography. |
Categoria do assunto: |
P Recursos Naturais, Ciências Ambientais e da Terra |
Marc: |
LEADER 02167naa a2200493 a 4500 001 2115130 005 2020-04-27 008 2020 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d 024 7 $a10.1111/brv.12567$2DOI 100 1 $aTHAKUR, M. P. 245 $aTowards an integrative understanding of soil biodiversity.$h[electronic resource] 260 $c2020 520 $aSoil is one of the most biodiverse terrestrial habitats. Yet, we lack an integrative conceptual framework for understanding the patterns and mechanisms driving soil biodiversity. One of the underlying reasons for our poor understanding of soil biodiversity patterns relates to whether key biodiversity theories (historically developed for aboveground and aquatic organisms) are applicable to patterns of soil biodiversity. Here, we present a systematic literature review to investigate whether and how key biodiversity theories (species?energy relationship, theory of island biogeography, metacommunity theory, niche theory and neutral theory) can explain observed patterns of soil biodiversity. We then discuss two spatial compartments nested within soil at which biodiversity theories can be applied to acknowledge the scale-dependent nature of soil biodiversity. 650 $aBiodiversity 650 $aBiogeography 650 $aBiologia do Solo 650 $aEstrutura do Solo 700 1 $aPHILLIPS, H. R. P. 700 1 $aBROSE, U. 700 1 $aVRIES, F. T. de 700 1 $aLAVELLE, P. 700 1 $aLOREAU, M. 700 1 $aMATHIEU, J. 700 1 $aMULDER, C. 700 1 $aPUTTEN, W. H. V. D. 700 1 $aRILLIG, M. C. 700 1 $aWARDLE, D. A. 700 1 $aBACH, E. M. 700 1 $aBARTZ, M. L. C. 700 1 $aBENNETT, J. M. 700 1 $aBRIONES, M. J. I. 700 1 $aBROWN, G. G. 700 1 $aDECAENS, T. 700 1 $aEISENHAUER, N. 700 1 $aFERLIAN, O. 700 1 $aGUERRA, C. A. 700 1 $aKONIG-RIES, B. 700 1 $aORGIAZZI, A. 700 1 $aRAMIREZ, K. S. 700 1 $aRUSSELL, D. J. 700 1 $aRUTGERS, M. 700 1 $aWALL, D. H. 700 1 $aCAMERON, E. K. 773 $tBiological Reviews$gv. 9, n. 2, p. 350-364, Apr. 2020.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
Registro original: |
Embrapa Florestas (CNPF) |
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
URL |
Voltar
|
|
| Acesso ao texto completo restrito à biblioteca da Embrapa Soja. Para informações adicionais entre em contato com valeria.cardoso@embrapa.br. |
Registro Completo
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Soja. |
Data corrente: |
17/02/2017 |
Data da última atualização: |
13/06/2017 |
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
Circulação/Nível: |
A - 2 |
Autoria: |
MOREIRA, A.; MORAES, L. A. C.; FURLAN, T.; HEINRICHS, R. |
Afiliação: |
ADONIS MOREIRA, CNPSO; LARISSA ALEXANDRA CARDOSO MORAES, CNPSO; UEL; UNESP DRACENA. |
Título: |
Effect of glyphosate and zinc application on yield, soil fertility, yield components, and nutritional status of soybean. |
Ano de publicação: |
2016 |
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, [S. l.], v. 47, n. 8, p. 1033-1047, 2016. |
ISSN: |
1532-2416 |
DOI: |
0.1080/00103624.2016.1165829 |
Idioma: |
Inglês |
Conteúdo: |
Glyphosate is a widely used nonselective herbicide for the control of agricultural weeds. It is being increasingly used in glyphosate resistant genetically modified plants. However, there are few studies on its effects on the nutritional status of soybean, particularly on the uptake of zinc (Zn). Two experiments were conducted under field conditions in a Typic Quartzipsamment and an Orthic Ferralsol to investigate the effect of glyphosate application × Zn interaction on soil fertility, yield components, seed yield (SY), shoot dry weight (SDW) yield, and nutritional status of soybean. The five Zn rates 0, 3, 6, 9, and 12 kg ha?1 were used in two soybean varieties [BRS 133 (conventional — NGM) and its essentially derived transgenic line BRS 245RR (GM), which was divided into: with (+Gly) and without (–Gly) glyphosate application. Only the P (phosphorus) and Zn available concentrations in the soil were impacted by Zn rates. However, the available P concentration only decreased in the soil planted with GM soybean. Mehlich 1 and diethylenetriaminepenta acetic acid – triethanolamine (DTPA–TEA), 7.3 extractants were effective to determine the available Zn. In thetwo crop sites, the number of pods per plant (NPP) and the SDW yield were affected by the interaction varieties × Zn. SY was influenced by the applica- tion of the herbicide, reducing a potential phytotoxic effect with the use of high rates. Regarding the nutrients, only the foliar calcium (Ca), boron (B), iron (Fe), and manganese (Mn) concentrations were negatively affected by glyphosate, and in the case of Zn, the difference occurred only between the varieties BRS 133 and BRS 245RR. MenosGlyphosate is a widely used nonselective herbicide for the control of agricultural weeds. It is being increasingly used in glyphosate resistant genetically modified plants. However, there are few studies on its effects on the nutritional status of soybean, particularly on the uptake of zinc (Zn). Two experiments were conducted under field conditions in a Typic Quartzipsamment and an Orthic Ferralsol to investigate the effect of glyphosate application × Zn interaction on soil fertility, yield components, seed yield (SY), shoot dry weight (SDW) yield, and nutritional status of soybean. The five Zn rates 0, 3, 6, 9, and 12 kg ha?1 were used in two soybean varieties [BRS 133 (conventional — NGM) and its essentially derived transgenic line BRS 245RR (GM), which was divided into: with (+Gly) and without (–Gly) glyphosate application. Only the P (phosphorus) and Zn available concentrations in the soil were impacted by Zn rates. However, the available P concentration only decreased in the soil planted with GM soybean. Mehlich 1 and diethylenetriaminepenta acetic acid – triethanolamine (DTPA–TEA), 7.3 extractants were effective to determine the available Zn. In thetwo crop sites, the number of pods per plant (NPP) and the SDW yield were affected by the interaction varieties × Zn. SY was influenced by the applica- tion of the herbicide, reducing a potential phytotoxic effect with the use of high rates. Regarding the nutrients, only the foliar calcium (Ca), boron (B), iron (Fe), and ma... Mostrar Tudo |
Palavras-Chave: |
NUTRIENTES. |
Thesagro: |
Acidez do Solo; Herbicida; Soja. |
Categoria do assunto: |
-- |
Marc: |
LEADER 02401naa a2200229 a 4500 001 2064646 005 2017-06-13 008 2016 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d 022 $a1532-2416 024 7 $a0.1080/00103624.2016.1165829$2DOI 100 1 $aMOREIRA, A. 245 $aEffect of glyphosate and zinc application on yield, soil fertility, yield components, and nutritional status of soybean.$h[electronic resource] 260 $c2016 520 $aGlyphosate is a widely used nonselective herbicide for the control of agricultural weeds. It is being increasingly used in glyphosate resistant genetically modified plants. However, there are few studies on its effects on the nutritional status of soybean, particularly on the uptake of zinc (Zn). Two experiments were conducted under field conditions in a Typic Quartzipsamment and an Orthic Ferralsol to investigate the effect of glyphosate application × Zn interaction on soil fertility, yield components, seed yield (SY), shoot dry weight (SDW) yield, and nutritional status of soybean. The five Zn rates 0, 3, 6, 9, and 12 kg ha?1 were used in two soybean varieties [BRS 133 (conventional — NGM) and its essentially derived transgenic line BRS 245RR (GM), which was divided into: with (+Gly) and without (–Gly) glyphosate application. Only the P (phosphorus) and Zn available concentrations in the soil were impacted by Zn rates. However, the available P concentration only decreased in the soil planted with GM soybean. Mehlich 1 and diethylenetriaminepenta acetic acid – triethanolamine (DTPA–TEA), 7.3 extractants were effective to determine the available Zn. In thetwo crop sites, the number of pods per plant (NPP) and the SDW yield were affected by the interaction varieties × Zn. SY was influenced by the applica- tion of the herbicide, reducing a potential phytotoxic effect with the use of high rates. Regarding the nutrients, only the foliar calcium (Ca), boron (B), iron (Fe), and manganese (Mn) concentrations were negatively affected by glyphosate, and in the case of Zn, the difference occurred only between the varieties BRS 133 and BRS 245RR. 650 $aAcidez do Solo 650 $aHerbicida 650 $aSoja 653 $aNUTRIENTES 700 1 $aMORAES, L. A. C. 700 1 $aFURLAN, T. 700 1 $aHEINRICHS, R. 773 $tCommunications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, [S. l.]$gv. 47, n. 8, p. 1033-1047, 2016.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
Registro original: |
Embrapa Soja (CNPSO) |
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
Nenhum registro encontrado para a expressão de busca informada. |
|
|