|
|
| Acesso ao texto completo restrito à biblioteca da Embrapa Agroenergia. Para informações adicionais entre em contato com cnpae.biblioteca@embrapa.br. |
Registro Completo |
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Agroenergia. |
Data corrente: |
19/10/2012 |
Data da última atualização: |
21/09/2017 |
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
Autoria: |
ALMEIDA, J. R. M. de; FAVARO, L. C. de L.; QUIRINO, B. F. |
Afiliação: |
JOAO RICARDO MOREIRA DE ALMEIDA, CNPAE; LEIA CECILIA DE LIMA FAVARO, CNPAE; BETANIA FERRAZ QUIRINO, CNPAE. |
Título: |
Biodiesel biorefinery: opportunities and challenges for microbial production of fuels and chemicals from glycerol waste. |
Ano de publicação: |
2012 |
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Biotechnology for Biofuels, London, v. 5, n. 1, p. 48-64, 2012. |
DOI: |
10.1186/1754-6834-5-48 |
Idioma: |
Inglês |
Conteúdo: |
The considerable increase in biodiesel production worldwide in the last 5 years resulted in a stoichiometric increased coproduction of crude glycerol. As an excess of crude glycerol has been produced, its value on market was reduced and it is becoming a “waste-stream” instead of a valuable “coproduct”. The development of biorefineries, i.e. production of chemicals and power integrated with conversion processes of biomass into biofuels, has been singled out as a way to achieve economically viable production chains, valorize residues and coproducts, and reduce industrial waste disposal. In this sense, several alternatives aimed at the use of crude glycerol to produce fuels and chemicals by microbial fermentation have been evaluated. This review summarizes different strategies employed to produce biofuels and chemicals (1,3-propanediol, 2,3-butanediol, ethanol, n-butanol, organic acids, polyols and others) by microbial fermentation of glycerol. Initially, the industrial use of each chemical is briefly presented; then we systematically summarize and discuss the different strategies to produce each chemical, including selection and genetic engineering of producers, and optimization of process conditions to improve yield and productivity. Finally, the impact of the developments obtained until now are placed in perspective and opportunities and challenges for using crude glycerol to the development of biodiesel-based biorefineries are considered. In conclusion, the microbial fermentation of glycerol represents a remarkable alternative to add value to the biodiesel production chain helping the development of biorefineries, which will allow this biofuel to be more competitive. MenosThe considerable increase in biodiesel production worldwide in the last 5 years resulted in a stoichiometric increased coproduction of crude glycerol. As an excess of crude glycerol has been produced, its value on market was reduced and it is becoming a “waste-stream” instead of a valuable “coproduct”. The development of biorefineries, i.e. production of chemicals and power integrated with conversion processes of biomass into biofuels, has been singled out as a way to achieve economically viable production chains, valorize residues and coproducts, and reduce industrial waste disposal. In this sense, several alternatives aimed at the use of crude glycerol to produce fuels and chemicals by microbial fermentation have been evaluated. This review summarizes different strategies employed to produce biofuels and chemicals (1,3-propanediol, 2,3-butanediol, ethanol, n-butanol, organic acids, polyols and others) by microbial fermentation of glycerol. Initially, the industrial use of each chemical is briefly presented; then we systematically summarize and discuss the different strategies to produce each chemical, including selection and genetic engineering of producers, and optimization of process conditions to improve yield and productivity. Finally, the impact of the developments obtained until now are placed in perspective and opportunities and challenges for using crude glycerol to the development of biodiesel-based biorefineries are considered. In conclusion, the microbial fermen... Mostrar Tudo |
Thesaurus Nal: |
biodiesel; biofuels; fermentation; glycerol; metabolic engineering. |
Categoria do assunto: |
-- |
Marc: |
LEADER 02395naa a2200217 a 4500 001 1937222 005 2017-09-21 008 2012 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d 024 7 $a10.1186/1754-6834-5-48$2DOI 100 1 $aALMEIDA, J. R. M. de 245 $aBiodiesel biorefinery$bopportunities and challenges for microbial production of fuels and chemicals from glycerol waste.$h[electronic resource] 260 $c2012 520 $aThe considerable increase in biodiesel production worldwide in the last 5 years resulted in a stoichiometric increased coproduction of crude glycerol. As an excess of crude glycerol has been produced, its value on market was reduced and it is becoming a “waste-stream” instead of a valuable “coproduct”. The development of biorefineries, i.e. production of chemicals and power integrated with conversion processes of biomass into biofuels, has been singled out as a way to achieve economically viable production chains, valorize residues and coproducts, and reduce industrial waste disposal. In this sense, several alternatives aimed at the use of crude glycerol to produce fuels and chemicals by microbial fermentation have been evaluated. This review summarizes different strategies employed to produce biofuels and chemicals (1,3-propanediol, 2,3-butanediol, ethanol, n-butanol, organic acids, polyols and others) by microbial fermentation of glycerol. Initially, the industrial use of each chemical is briefly presented; then we systematically summarize and discuss the different strategies to produce each chemical, including selection and genetic engineering of producers, and optimization of process conditions to improve yield and productivity. Finally, the impact of the developments obtained until now are placed in perspective and opportunities and challenges for using crude glycerol to the development of biodiesel-based biorefineries are considered. In conclusion, the microbial fermentation of glycerol represents a remarkable alternative to add value to the biodiesel production chain helping the development of biorefineries, which will allow this biofuel to be more competitive. 650 $abiodiesel 650 $abiofuels 650 $afermentation 650 $aglycerol 650 $ametabolic engineering 700 1 $aFAVARO, L. C. de L. 700 1 $aQUIRINO, B. F. 773 $tBiotechnology for Biofuels, London$gv. 5, n. 1, p. 48-64, 2012.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
Registro original: |
Embrapa Agroenergia (CNPAE) |
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
URL |
Voltar
|
|
Registros recuperados : 4 | |
1. | | LAVELLE, P.; SPAIN, A.; BLOUIN, M.; BROWN, G. G.; DECAENS, T.; GRIMALDO, M.; JIMÉNEZ, J. J.; McKEY, D.; MATHIEU, J.; VELASQUEZ, E.; ZANGERLÉ, A. Ecosystem engineers in a self-organized soil: a review of concepts and future research questions. Soil Science, v. 181, n. 3/4, p. 91-109, Mar./Apr. 2016.Tipo: Artigo em Periódico Indexado | Circulação/Nível: B - 1 |
Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Florestas. |
| |
2. | | CUNHA, L.; BROWN, G. G.; STANTON, D. W. G.; SILVA, E. da; HANSEL, F. A.; JORGE, G.; MCKEY, D.; VIDAL-TORRADO, P.; MACEDO, R. S.; VELASQUEZ, E.; JAMES, S. W.; LAVELLE, P.; KILLE, P. Soil animals and pedogenesis: the role of earthworms in anthropogenic soils. Soil Science, v. 181, n. 3/4, p. 110-125, Mar./Apr. 2016. Participação da Terra Preta de Índio Network.Tipo: Artigo em Periódico Indexado | Circulação/Nível: B - 1 |
Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Amazônia Ocidental; Embrapa Florestas. |
| |
3. | | DEMETRIO, W. C.; CONRADO, A. C.; ACIOLI, A. N. S.; FERREIRA, A. C.; BARTZ, M. L. C.; JAMES, S. W.; SILVA, E. da; MAIA, L. S.; MARTINS, G. C.; MACEDO, R. S.; STANTON, D. W. G.; LAVELLE, P.; VELASQUEZ, E.; ZANGERLÉ, A.; BARBOSA, R.; TAPIA-CORAL, S. C.; MUNIZ, A. W.; SANTOS, A.; FERREIRA, T.; SEGALLA, R. F.; DECAËNS, T.; NADOLNY, H. S.; PEÑA-VENEGAS, C. P.; MAIA, C. M. B. F.; PASINI, A.; MOTA, A. F.; TAUBE JÚNIOR, P. S.; SILVA, T. A. C.; REBELLATO, L.; OLIVEIRA JUNIOR, R. C. de; NEVES, E. G.; LIMA, H. P.; FEITOSA, R. M.; TORRADO, P. V.; McKEY, D.; CLEMENT, C. R.; SHOCK, M. P.; TEIXEIRA, W. G.; MOTTA, A. C. V.; MELO, V. F.; DIECKOW, J.; GARRASTAZU, M. C.; CHUBATSU, L. S.; KILLE, P.; BROWN, G. G.; CUNHA, L. A "dirty" footprint: macroinvertebrate diversity in Amazonian Anthropic soils. Global Change Biology, v. 27, n. 19, p. 4575-4591, Oct. 2021.Tipo: Artigo em Periódico Indexado | Circulação/Nível: A - 1 |
Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Amazônia Ocidental; Embrapa Amazônia Oriental; Embrapa Florestas; Embrapa Solos. |
| |
4. | | LOMBARDO, U.; ARROYO-KALIN, M.; SCHMIDT, M.; HUISMAN, H.; LIMA, H. P.; MORAES, M. de P.; NEVES, E. G.; CLEMENT, C. R.; FONSECA, J. A. da; ALMEIDA, F. O. de; ALHO, C. F. B. V.; RAMSEY, C. B.; BROWN, G. G.; CAVALLINI, M. S.; COSTA, M. L. da; CUNHA, L.; ANJOS, L. H. C. dos; DENEVAN, W. M.; FAUSTO, C.; CAROMANO, C. F.; FONTANA, A.; FRANCHETTO, B.; GLASER, B.; HECKENBERGER, M. J.; HECHT, S.; HONORATO, V.; JAROSCH, K. A.; JUNQUEIRA, A. B.; KATER, T.; TAMANAHA, E. K.; KUYPER, T. W.; LEHMANN, J.; MADELLA, M.; MAEZUMI, S. Y.; CASCON, L. M.; MAYLE, F. E.; MCKEY, D.; MORAES, B.; MORCOTE-RÍOS, G.; BARBOSA, C. A. P.; MAGALHÃES, M. P.; PRESTES-CARNEIRO, G.; PUGLIESE, F.; PUPIM, F. N.; RACZKA, M. F.; PY-DANIEL, A. R.; ROCHA, B. C. da; RODRIGUES, L.; ROSTAIN, S.; MACEDO, R. S.; SHOCK, M. P.; SPRAFKE, T.; BASSI, F. S.; VALLE, R.; VIDAL-TORRADO, P.; VILLAGRÁN, X. S.; WATLING, J.; WEBER, S. L.; TEIXEIRA, W. G. Evidence confirms an anthropic origin of Amazonian Dark Earths. Nature Communications, v. 13, n. 3444, 2022. 6 p.Tipo: Nota Técnica/Nota Científica |
Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Florestas; Embrapa Solos. |
| |
Registros recuperados : 4 | |
|
Nenhum registro encontrado para a expressão de busca informada. |
|
|