|
|
Registro Completo |
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Uva e Vinho. |
Data corrente: |
05/02/2021 |
Data da última atualização: |
03/03/2022 |
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
Autoria: |
FAJARDO, T. V. M.; QUECINI, V. |
Afiliação: |
THOR VINICIUS MARTINS FAJARDO, CNPUV; VERA MARIA QUECINI, CNPUV. |
Título: |
Comparative transcriptome analyses between cultivated and wild grapes reveal conservation of expressed genes but extensive rewiring of co-expression networks. |
Ano de publicação: |
2021 |
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Plant Molecular Biology, online, Feb. 2021. |
DOI: |
10.1007/s11103-021-01122-2 |
Idioma: |
Inglês |
Conteúdo: |
Key message The transcriptomes of wild and cultivated grapes consists of similar expressed genes but distinct wiring of co-expressed modules associated with environmental conditions. Abstract Grapevine is an important fruit crop worldwide, with high economic value and widespread distribution. Commercial production is based on Vitis vinifera, and, to a lesser extent, on hybrids with American grapes, such as V. labrusca. Wild grape relatives are important sources of resistance against biotic and abiotic factors; however, their global gene expression patterns remain poorly characterized. We associated genome-wide transcript profling to phenotypic analyses to investigate the responses of cultivated and wild vines to vineyard conditions. The expressed genes in the Vitis reference transcriptome are largely shared by wild grapes, V. labrusca hybrids and vinifera cultivars. In contrast, signifcant diferential regulation between wild and vinifera genotypes represents 80% of gene expression variation, regardless of the environment. In wild grapes, genes associated to regulatory processes are downregulated, whereas those involved in metabolic pathways are upregulated, in comparison to vinifera. Photosynthesis-related ontologies are overrepresented in the induced genes, in agreement with higher contents of chlorophyll in wild grapes. Co-regulated gene network analyses provide evidence of more complex transcriptome organization in vinifera. In wild grapes, genes involved in signaling pathways of stress-related hormones are overrepresented in modules associated with the environment. Consensus network analyses revealed high preservation within co-regulated gene modules between cultivated and wild grapes, but divergent relationships among the expression clusters. In conclusion, the distinct phenotypes of wild and cultivated grapes are underlain by diferences in gene expression, but also by distinct higher-order organization of the transcriptome and contrasting association of co-expressed gene clusters with the environment. MenosKey message The transcriptomes of wild and cultivated grapes consists of similar expressed genes but distinct wiring of co-expressed modules associated with environmental conditions. Abstract Grapevine is an important fruit crop worldwide, with high economic value and widespread distribution. Commercial production is based on Vitis vinifera, and, to a lesser extent, on hybrids with American grapes, such as V. labrusca. Wild grape relatives are important sources of resistance against biotic and abiotic factors; however, their global gene expression patterns remain poorly characterized. We associated genome-wide transcript profling to phenotypic analyses to investigate the responses of cultivated and wild vines to vineyard conditions. The expressed genes in the Vitis reference transcriptome are largely shared by wild grapes, V. labrusca hybrids and vinifera cultivars. In contrast, signifcant diferential regulation between wild and vinifera genotypes represents 80% of gene expression variation, regardless of the environment. In wild grapes, genes associated to regulatory processes are downregulated, whereas those involved in metabolic pathways are upregulated, in comparison to vinifera. Photosynthesis-related ontologies are overrepresented in the induced genes, in agreement with higher contents of chlorophyll in wild grapes. Co-regulated gene network analyses provide evidence of more complex transcriptome organization in vinifera. In wild grapes, genes involved in signaling pat... Mostrar Tudo |
Palavras-Chave: |
Environmental conditions; Grapevine; Network analysis. |
Thesaurus Nal: |
Parthenocissus; Phenology; Transcriptome; Vitaceae. |
Categoria do assunto: |
F Plantas e Produtos de Origem Vegetal |
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/item/220967/1/Fajardo-Quecini2021-Article-ComparativeTranscriptomeAnalys.pdf
|
Marc: |
LEADER 02782naa a2200229 a 4500 001 2129823 005 2022-03-03 008 2021 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d 024 7 $a10.1007/s11103-021-01122-2$2DOI 100 1 $aFAJARDO, T. V. M. 245 $aComparative transcriptome analyses between cultivated and wild grapes reveal conservation of expressed genes but extensive rewiring of co-expression networks.$h[electronic resource] 260 $c2021 520 $aKey message The transcriptomes of wild and cultivated grapes consists of similar expressed genes but distinct wiring of co-expressed modules associated with environmental conditions. Abstract Grapevine is an important fruit crop worldwide, with high economic value and widespread distribution. Commercial production is based on Vitis vinifera, and, to a lesser extent, on hybrids with American grapes, such as V. labrusca. Wild grape relatives are important sources of resistance against biotic and abiotic factors; however, their global gene expression patterns remain poorly characterized. We associated genome-wide transcript profling to phenotypic analyses to investigate the responses of cultivated and wild vines to vineyard conditions. The expressed genes in the Vitis reference transcriptome are largely shared by wild grapes, V. labrusca hybrids and vinifera cultivars. In contrast, signifcant diferential regulation between wild and vinifera genotypes represents 80% of gene expression variation, regardless of the environment. In wild grapes, genes associated to regulatory processes are downregulated, whereas those involved in metabolic pathways are upregulated, in comparison to vinifera. Photosynthesis-related ontologies are overrepresented in the induced genes, in agreement with higher contents of chlorophyll in wild grapes. Co-regulated gene network analyses provide evidence of more complex transcriptome organization in vinifera. In wild grapes, genes involved in signaling pathways of stress-related hormones are overrepresented in modules associated with the environment. Consensus network analyses revealed high preservation within co-regulated gene modules between cultivated and wild grapes, but divergent relationships among the expression clusters. In conclusion, the distinct phenotypes of wild and cultivated grapes are underlain by diferences in gene expression, but also by distinct higher-order organization of the transcriptome and contrasting association of co-expressed gene clusters with the environment. 650 $aParthenocissus 650 $aPhenology 650 $aTranscriptome 650 $aVitaceae 653 $aEnvironmental conditions 653 $aGrapevine 653 $aNetwork analysis 700 1 $aQUECINI, V. 773 $tPlant Molecular Biology, online, Feb. 2021.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
Registro original: |
Embrapa Uva e Vinho (CNPUV) |
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
URL |
Voltar
|
|
Registros recuperados : 283 | |
2. | | FAJARDO, T. V. M. Controle de doenças causadas por vírus. In: GARRIDO, L. da R.; HOFFMANN, A.; BOTTON, M. (Ed.). Boas práticas agrícolas na viticultura: manejo de pragas e doenças. Brasília, DF: SEBRAE; Bento Gonçalves: Embrapa Uva e Vinho: IBRAVIN, 2011. p. 53-74. (Boas Práticas Agrícolas - BPA; Uva para processamento, 4). Programa de Desenvolvimento da Cadeia Produtiva de Vinhos, Espumantes e Suco de Uva - PAS.Tipo: Capítulo em Livro Técnico-Científico |
Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Uva e Vinho. |
| |
3. | | FAJARDO, T. V. M. Controle de doenças causadas por vírus. IN: GARRIDO, L. da R.; HOFFMANN, A.; SILVEIRA, S. V. da. (Ed.). Produção integrada de uva para processamento: manejo de pragas e doenças. Brasília, DF: Embrapa, 2015. v. 4, cap. 3, p. 49-70.Tipo: Capítulo em Livro Técnico-Científico |
Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Uva e Vinho. |
| |
4. | | FAJARDO, T. V. M. Controle de doenças causadas por vírus. In: HOFFMANN, A.; SILVEIRA, S. V.; GARRIDO, L.R. (Eds.). Manual Técnico de Boas Práticas Agrícolas - Uva para Processamento. Brasília, DF: SEBRAE; Bento Gonçalves, RS: IBRAVIN, 2016. pp. 151-171.Tipo: Capítulo em Livro Técnico-Científico |
Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Uva e Vinho. |
| |
5. | | FAJARDO, T. V. M. Controle de doenças causador por vírus. IN: GARRIDO, L. da R.; HOFFMANN, A.; SILVEIRA, S. V. da (Ed.). Produção integrada de uva para processamento: manejo de pragas e doenças. Brasília, DF: Embrapa, 2015. v. 4, cap. 3, p. 49-70.Tipo: Capítulo em Livro Técnico-Científico |
Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Uva e Vinho. |
| |
10. | | FAJARDO, T. V. M. Vírus nas mudas. A Vindima, Flores da Cunha, v. 4, n. 30, p. 14, jun. 2011.Tipo: Artigo de Divulgação na Mídia |
Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Uva e Vinho. |
| |
11. | | FAJARDO, T. V. M. (ed.). Uva para processamento: fitossanidade. Brasília, DF: Embrapa Informação Tecnológica; Bento Gonçalves: Embrapa Uva e Vinho, 2003. 128 p. il. (Frutas do Brasil, 35). Inclui glossário.Tipo: Autoria/Organização/Edição de Livros |
Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Unidades Centrais; Embrapa Uva e Vinho. |
| |
19. | | KUHN, G. B.; FAJARDO, T. V. M. Doenças de uva. Cultivar Hortaliças e Frutas, Pelotas, v. 1, n. 1, p. 23-27, abr./maio 2000. p. 23-27 il.Tipo: Artigo em Periódico Indexado | Circulação/Nível: Nacional - C |
Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Uva e Vinho. |
| |
20. | | FAJARDO, T. V. M.; EIRAS, M. Doenças virais em videiras. In:BUENO, C. J. (Org.). Doenças e pragas em videiras. São Paulo, SP: Instituto Biológico de São Paulo, nov. 2022. (online). (Boletim Técnico, 33). pp. 61-103.Tipo: Capítulo em Livro Técnico-Científico |
Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Uva e Vinho. |
| |
Registros recuperados : 283 | |
|
Nenhum registro encontrado para a expressão de busca informada. |
|
|