| |
|
|
|
Registro Completo |
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Agroindústria Tropical. |
|
Data corrente: |
30/07/2001 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
30/07/2001 |
|
Autoria: |
REIS FILHO, J. de S.; DUARTE, P. H. M.; LINHARES, M. A.; SOUSA, H. D.; DUARTE, J. B. |
|
Título: |
Avaliacao de metodos de homogeneizacao para a classificacao comercial do milho |
|
Ano de publicação: |
1999 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
GOIANIA: EMATER-GO |
|
Páginas: |
16p |
|
Série: |
Boletim de Pesquisa, 05. |
|
ISSN: |
1413-747X |
|
Idioma: |
Português |
|
Conteúdo: |
Comparou-se quatro metodos de homogeneizacao de graos de milho para a obtencao de amostras medias destinadas a classificacao comercial: Lona, Lona + Divisor Conico, Divisor Conico e Divisor de Solo. A variavel utilizada como criterio dessa avaliacao constitui na percentagem de Materias Estranhas, Impuresas e Fragmentos (m.e.i). Cada metodo foi aplicado a uma massa de graos de, aproximadamente, 40kg, a qual foi homogeneizada e dividida, sucessivamente, ate a obtencao de 25 amostras medias. Determinou-se, em cada amostra, a porcentagem de m.e.i., conforme metodologia preconizada pela Classificacao de Produtos de Origem Vegetal. As analises estatisticas dos dados mostraram que os metodos Divisor de Solo e Divisor Conico nao diferiram entre si, tendo sido os mais eficientes em termo de homogeneidade das amostras produzidas. O metodo Lona + Divisor Conico gerou uma homogeneidade intermediaria, enquanto o metodo Lona produziu amostras bastante heterogenea. Os resultados demonstraram, portanto, que o metodo Lona nao oferece seguranca para a obtencao de amostras medias. |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Classificacao; Metodos. |
|
Thesagro: |
Milho. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
-- |
|
Marc: |
LEADER 01679nam a2200229 a 4500
001 1423158
005 2001-07-30
008 1999 bl uuuu u0uu1 u #d
022 $a1413-747X
100 1 $aREIS FILHO, J. de S.
245 $aAvaliacao de metodos de homogeneizacao para a classificacao comercial do milho
260 $aGOIANIA: EMATER-GO$c1999
300 $a16p
490 $aBoletim de Pesquisa, 05.
520 $aComparou-se quatro metodos de homogeneizacao de graos de milho para a obtencao de amostras medias destinadas a classificacao comercial: Lona, Lona + Divisor Conico, Divisor Conico e Divisor de Solo. A variavel utilizada como criterio dessa avaliacao constitui na percentagem de Materias Estranhas, Impuresas e Fragmentos (m.e.i). Cada metodo foi aplicado a uma massa de graos de, aproximadamente, 40kg, a qual foi homogeneizada e dividida, sucessivamente, ate a obtencao de 25 amostras medias. Determinou-se, em cada amostra, a porcentagem de m.e.i., conforme metodologia preconizada pela Classificacao de Produtos de Origem Vegetal. As analises estatisticas dos dados mostraram que os metodos Divisor de Solo e Divisor Conico nao diferiram entre si, tendo sido os mais eficientes em termo de homogeneidade das amostras produzidas. O metodo Lona + Divisor Conico gerou uma homogeneidade intermediaria, enquanto o metodo Lona produziu amostras bastante heterogenea. Os resultados demonstraram, portanto, que o metodo Lona nao oferece seguranca para a obtencao de amostras medias.
650 $aMilho
653 $aClassificacao
653 $aMetodos
700 1 $aDUARTE, P. H. M.
700 1 $aLINHARES, M. A.
700 1 $aSOUSA, H. D.
700 1 $aDUARTE, J. B.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Agroindústria Tropical (CNPAT) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
URL |
Voltar
|
|
|
Registro Completo
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Agroindústria Tropical; Embrapa Arroz e Feijão; Embrapa Cerrados; Embrapa Recursos Genéticos e Biotecnologia. |
|
Data corrente: |
25/11/2022 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
08/12/2022 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
|
Circulação/Nível: |
A - 1 |
|
Autoria: |
HIPOLITO, J.; SHIRAI, L. T.; HALINSKI, R.; GUIDOLIN, A. S.; SILVA, R. B. Q. da; QUINTELA, E. D.; DIAS, N. da S.; PIRES, C. S. S.; FONTES, E. M. G. |
|
Afiliação: |
JULIANA HIPOLITO; LEILA TERUKO SHIRAI; ROSANA HALINSKI; ALINE SARTORI GUIDOLIN; RANYSE BARBOSA QUERINO DA SILVA, CPAC; ELIANE DIAS QUINTELA, CNPAF; NIVIA DA SILVA DIAS PINI, CNPAT; CARMEN SILVIA SOARES PIRES, Cenargen; ELIANA MARIA GOUVEIA FONTES, Cenargen. |
|
Título: |
Brazilian female researchers do not publish less despite an academic structure that deepens sex gap. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2022 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
PLoS ONE, v. 17, n. 8, 2022. |
|
Páginas: |
17 p. |
|
DOI: |
https://doi.org/10.1371/ journal.pone.0273291 |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
In the 21st century, we still need to talk about gender inequality in science. Even with the
sharp growth of studies on this theme over the last decades, we are still trying to convince
our peers that diversity matters and, if embraced, makes better science. Part of this draw-
back can be related to the need for data to support effective proposals to change the aca-
demic scenario. In order to close some of those gaps, we here analyze 1) the profile of
Brazilian researchers based on production, impact, and membership to the Brazilian Acad-
emy of Sciences, 2) participation in the Editorial boards of Brazilian journals dedicated to
Entomology, and, 3) the academic scenario of Brazilian Entomology focusing on the sex of
the first and last authors in peer-reviewed international publications related to Entomology.
We aimed to provide a deeper look on the Brazilian Entomology scenario and to expand the
amount of data availability to stimulate and foster a mind-change in the current academic
structure. We performed scientometric searches and analysis using different platforms and
found that the number and impact of the publications by female researchers, as observed
by relative numbers, are not less than that of males. Despite that, female researchers are
less represented at the Brazilian Academy of Sciences and editorial boards, reinforcing the
lack of women recognition in science. Thus, we observe that some narratives related to the
productivity gap can be misleading to a perpetuation of our internal and structural biases.
We here expanded data from a previous paper where we scrutinized the Brazilian Entomol-
ogy scenario and discussed the patches and systems that maintain gender gap in science. MenosIn the 21st century, we still need to talk about gender inequality in science. Even with the
sharp growth of studies on this theme over the last decades, we are still trying to convince
our peers that diversity matters and, if embraced, makes better science. Part of this draw-
back can be related to the need for data to support effective proposals to change the aca-
demic scenario. In order to close some of those gaps, we here analyze 1) the profile of
Brazilian researchers based on production, impact, and membership to the Brazilian Acad-
emy of Sciences, 2) participation in the Editorial boards of Brazilian journals dedicated to
Entomology, and, 3) the academic scenario of Brazilian Entomology focusing on the sex of
the first and last authors in peer-reviewed international publications related to Entomology.
We aimed to provide a deeper look on the Brazilian Entomology scenario and to expand the
amount of data availability to stimulate and foster a mind-change in the current academic
structure. We performed scientometric searches and analysis using different platforms and
found that the number and impact of the publications by female researchers, as observed
by relative numbers, are not less than that of males. Despite that, female researchers are
less represented at the Brazilian Academy of Sciences and editorial boards, reinforcing the
lack of women recognition in science. Thus, we observe that some narratives related to the
productivity gap can be misleading to a per... Mostrar Tudo |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Ciência; Cientometria. |
|
Thesagro: |
Entomologia; Igualdade de Genero; Mulher; Papel da mulher; Pesquisa; Reconhecimento. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
O Insetos e Entomologia |
|
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/doc/1148745/1/Ranyse-Brazilian-female-researchers.pdf
|
|
Marc: |
LEADER 02670naa a2200337 a 4500
001 2148745
005 2022-12-08
008 2022 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
024 7 $ahttps://doi.org/10.1371/ journal.pone.0273291$2DOI
100 1 $aHIPOLITO, J.
245 $aBrazilian female researchers do not publish less despite an academic structure that deepens sex gap.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2022
300 $a17 p.
520 $aIn the 21st century, we still need to talk about gender inequality in science. Even with the sharp growth of studies on this theme over the last decades, we are still trying to convince our peers that diversity matters and, if embraced, makes better science. Part of this draw- back can be related to the need for data to support effective proposals to change the aca- demic scenario. In order to close some of those gaps, we here analyze 1) the profile of Brazilian researchers based on production, impact, and membership to the Brazilian Acad- emy of Sciences, 2) participation in the Editorial boards of Brazilian journals dedicated to Entomology, and, 3) the academic scenario of Brazilian Entomology focusing on the sex of the first and last authors in peer-reviewed international publications related to Entomology. We aimed to provide a deeper look on the Brazilian Entomology scenario and to expand the amount of data availability to stimulate and foster a mind-change in the current academic structure. We performed scientometric searches and analysis using different platforms and found that the number and impact of the publications by female researchers, as observed by relative numbers, are not less than that of males. Despite that, female researchers are less represented at the Brazilian Academy of Sciences and editorial boards, reinforcing the lack of women recognition in science. Thus, we observe that some narratives related to the productivity gap can be misleading to a perpetuation of our internal and structural biases. We here expanded data from a previous paper where we scrutinized the Brazilian Entomol- ogy scenario and discussed the patches and systems that maintain gender gap in science.
650 $aEntomologia
650 $aIgualdade de Genero
650 $aMulher
650 $aPapel da mulher
650 $aPesquisa
650 $aReconhecimento
653 $aCiência
653 $aCientometria
700 1 $aSHIRAI, L. T.
700 1 $aHALINSKI, R.
700 1 $aGUIDOLIN, A. S.
700 1 $aSILVA, R. B. Q. da
700 1 $aQUINTELA, E. D.
700 1 $aDIAS, N. da S.
700 1 $aPIRES, C. S. S.
700 1 $aFONTES, E. M. G.
773 $tPLoS ONE$gv. 17, n. 8, 2022.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Cerrados (CPAC) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
| Nenhum registro encontrado para a expressão de busca informada. |
|
|
