|
|
Registro Completo |
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Agrossilvipastoril; Embrapa Soja. |
Data corrente: |
08/01/2021 |
Data da última atualização: |
17/03/2022 |
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
Autoria: |
BUENO, A. de F.; PANIZZI, A. R.; HUNT, T. E.; DOURADO, P. M.; PITTA, R. M.; GONÇALVES, J. |
Afiliação: |
ADENEY DE FREITAS BUENO, CNPSO; ANTONIO RICARDO PANIZZI, CNPT; UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASCA-LINCOLN, LINCOLN; BAYER CROP SCIENCE, SÃO PAULO; RAFAEL MAJOR PITTA, CPAMT; UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DO PARANA, CURITIBA. |
Título: |
Challenges for Adoption of Integrated Pest Management (IPM): the Soybean Example. |
Ano de publicação: |
2021 |
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Neotropical Entomology, v. 50, p. 5-20, 2021. |
Páginas: |
16 p. |
DOI: |
10.1007/s13744-020-00792-9 |
Idioma: |
Inglês |
Conteúdo: |
Soybean is considered one of today?s most important crops. Planted on millions of hectares worldwide, the management of soybean pests usually requires large amounts of chemicals. However, a key component to meet the increasing demand for food due to the rapidly growing global population is protecting crops from pests while maintaining environmental quality through ecologically and economically sound integrated pest management (IPM) practices. Not only can IPM result in more profitable agriculture due to the reduction of pest control costs but also assures equitable, secure, sufficient, and stable flows of both food and ecosystem services. Despite those ecological and economic benefits, the vast areas of cultivated soybean as well as the convenience of spraying insecticides are encouraging the adoption of prophylactic pest control as a relatively inexpensive safeguard compared to IPM practices. Thus, in this forum, we discuss the reasons for soybean IPM not reaching its potential. We give examples of how we can revive this once successful pest management program with a focus on experiences in Brazil and the USA. We analyze IPM case studies to illustrate the need for growers to have easy and fast access to IPM information on its medium- and long-term benefits. Overall, this forum highlights the importance of IPM for agricultural sustainability including ecological and financial benefits. |
Thesagro: |
Agricultura Sustentável; Inseticida; Segurança Alimentar; Soja. |
Thesaurus Nal: |
Crop management; Economic threshold; Food security; Insecticides; Soybeans; Sustainable agriculture. |
Categoria do assunto: |
X Pesquisa, Tecnologia e Engenharia |
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/item/232646/1/ID-40068.pdf
|
Marc: |
LEADER 02320naa a2200325 a 4500 001 2129115 005 2022-03-17 008 2021 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d 024 7 $a10.1007/s13744-020-00792-9$2DOI 100 1 $aBUENO, A. de F. 245 $aChallenges for Adoption of Integrated Pest Management (IPM)$bthe Soybean Example.$h[electronic resource] 260 $c2021 300 $a16 p. 520 $aSoybean is considered one of today?s most important crops. Planted on millions of hectares worldwide, the management of soybean pests usually requires large amounts of chemicals. However, a key component to meet the increasing demand for food due to the rapidly growing global population is protecting crops from pests while maintaining environmental quality through ecologically and economically sound integrated pest management (IPM) practices. Not only can IPM result in more profitable agriculture due to the reduction of pest control costs but also assures equitable, secure, sufficient, and stable flows of both food and ecosystem services. Despite those ecological and economic benefits, the vast areas of cultivated soybean as well as the convenience of spraying insecticides are encouraging the adoption of prophylactic pest control as a relatively inexpensive safeguard compared to IPM practices. Thus, in this forum, we discuss the reasons for soybean IPM not reaching its potential. We give examples of how we can revive this once successful pest management program with a focus on experiences in Brazil and the USA. We analyze IPM case studies to illustrate the need for growers to have easy and fast access to IPM information on its medium- and long-term benefits. Overall, this forum highlights the importance of IPM for agricultural sustainability including ecological and financial benefits. 650 $aCrop management 650 $aEconomic threshold 650 $aFood security 650 $aInsecticides 650 $aSoybeans 650 $aSustainable agriculture 650 $aAgricultura Sustentável 650 $aInseticida 650 $aSegurança Alimentar 650 $aSoja 700 1 $aPANIZZI, A. R. 700 1 $aHUNT, T. E. 700 1 $aDOURADO, P. M. 700 1 $aPITTA, R. M. 700 1 $aGONÇALVES, J. 773 $tNeotropical Entomology$gv. 50, p. 5-20, 2021.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
Registro original: |
Embrapa Soja (CNPSO) |
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
URL |
Voltar
|
|
Registros recuperados : 1 | |
1. | | FAVERO, F.; GOMES, R. da C.; VIEIRA, T. C.; SANTANA, M. H. de A.; SANTOS, A. P. S.; CROZARA, A. S.; RIBEIRO, E. L. de A.; MIZUBUTI, Y. I. Relationships between residual feed intake and feedlot profitability, growth performance and carcass traits in Brahman cattle. In: ANNUAL MEETING BRAZILIAN SOCIETY OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 50., 2013, Campinas. The integration of Knowledge in animal production - abstracts. Campinas: SBZ, 2013 1 CD ROMTipo: Resumo em Anais de Congresso |
Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Gado de Corte. |
| |
Registros recuperados : 1 | |
|
Nenhum registro encontrado para a expressão de busca informada. |
|
|