| |
|
|
|
Registro Completo |
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Agroindústria Tropical; Embrapa Agropecuária Oeste; Embrapa Amapá; Embrapa Amazônia Ocidental; Embrapa Cerrados; Embrapa Clima Temperado; Embrapa Meio-Norte; Embrapa Pantanal; Embrapa Pecuária Sul; Embrapa Rondônia; Embrapa Roraima; Embrapa Semiárido; Embrapa Tabuleiros Costeiros; Embrapa Unidades Centrais. MenosEmbrapa Agroindústria Tropical; Embrapa Agropecuária Oeste; Embrapa Amapá; Embrapa Amazônia Ocidental; Embrapa Cerrados; Embrapa Clima Temperado; Embrapa Meio-Norte; Embrapa Pantanal; Embrapa Pecuária Sul; Embrapa Rondônia... Mostrar Todas |
|
Data corrente: |
04/04/2002 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
19/04/2002 |
|
Autoria: |
COSER, A. C.; PEREIRA, A. V. |
|
Título: |
Forrageiras para corte e pastejo. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2001 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Juiz de Fora: Embrapa Gado de Leite, 2001. |
|
Páginas: |
37 p. |
|
Série: |
(Embrapa Gado de Leite. Circular Tecnica, 66).
|
|
Idioma: |
Português |
|
Conteúdo: |
Engloba informações tecnológicas advindas de resultados de pesquisa, descrevendo características produtivas de diferentes forrageiras tropicais e temperadas e suas diferentes formas de uso, bem como respostas em relação ao manejo, à adubação e à irrigação, apresentando, ainda, resultados quantitativos e qualitativos e recomendações para melhor utilização dessas plantas forrageiras, presentes na maioria dos sistemas de produção anima. |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Brasil; Corrective dressing; Feed crops; Feeding; Forrageira; Forrageira trpical; Forrageiras tropicais; Juiz de Fora; Minas Gerais; Plant production; Planta forrageira - Corte; Planta forrageira - pastejo; Plantas forrageiras tropicais; Produção de forragem; Producao de forragens; Produção de leite; Production; Sistema de alimentação animal; Sistemas de alimentação; System; Tropical crops; Tropical forage. |
|
Thesagro: |
Adubação; Alimentação; Alimento Animal; Capim Elefante; Conservação; Corretivo; Corte; Feno; Forrageira Tropical; Forragem; Irrigação; Manejo; Manejo do Solo; Pastagem; Planta Forrageira; Plantio; Produção; Produção Animal; Produção Leiteira; Produção Vegetal; Silagem; Sistema de Alimentação; Variedade. |
|
Thesaurus Nal: |
animal feeding; animal production; crop management; fertilizers; irrigation; milk production; pastures; planting; soil management; varieties. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
-- |
|
Marc: |
LEADER 02556nam a2200805 a 4500
001 1564715
005 2002-04-19
008 2001 bl uuuu u0uu1 u #d
100 1 $aCOSER, A. C.
245 $aForrageiras para corte e pastejo.
260 $aJuiz de Fora: Embrapa Gado de Leite$c2001
300 $a37 p.
490 $a(Embrapa Gado de Leite. Circular Tecnica, 66).
520 $aEngloba informações tecnológicas advindas de resultados de pesquisa, descrevendo características produtivas de diferentes forrageiras tropicais e temperadas e suas diferentes formas de uso, bem como respostas em relação ao manejo, à adubação e à irrigação, apresentando, ainda, resultados quantitativos e qualitativos e recomendações para melhor utilização dessas plantas forrageiras, presentes na maioria dos sistemas de produção anima.
650 $aanimal feeding
650 $aanimal production
650 $acrop management
650 $afertilizers
650 $airrigation
650 $amilk production
650 $apastures
650 $aplanting
650 $asoil management
650 $avarieties
650 $aAdubação
650 $aAlimentação
650 $aAlimento Animal
650 $aCapim Elefante
650 $aConservação
650 $aCorretivo
650 $aCorte
650 $aFeno
650 $aForrageira Tropical
650 $aForragem
650 $aIrrigação
650 $aManejo
650 $aManejo do Solo
650 $aPastagem
650 $aPlanta Forrageira
650 $aPlantio
650 $aProdução
650 $aProdução Animal
650 $aProdução Leiteira
650 $aProdução Vegetal
650 $aSilagem
650 $aSistema de Alimentação
650 $aVariedade
653 $aBrasil
653 $aCorrective dressing
653 $aFeed crops
653 $aFeeding
653 $aForrageira
653 $aForrageira trpical
653 $aForrageiras tropicais
653 $aJuiz de Fora
653 $aMinas Gerais
653 $aPlant production
653 $aPlanta forrageira - Corte
653 $aPlanta forrageira - pastejo
653 $aPlantas forrageiras tropicais
653 $aProdução de forragem
653 $aProducao de forragens
653 $aProdução de leite
653 $aProduction
653 $aSistema de alimentação animal
653 $aSistemas de alimentação
653 $aSystem
653 $aTropical crops
653 $aTropical forage
700 1 $aPEREIRA, A. V.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Cerrados (CPAC) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
URL |
Voltar
|
|
|
 | Acesso ao texto completo restrito à biblioteca da Embrapa Florestas. Para informações adicionais entre em contato com cnpf.biblioteca@embrapa.br. |
Registro Completo
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Florestas. |
|
Data corrente: |
10/11/2014 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
10/11/2014 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
|
Circulação/Nível: |
A - 1 |
|
Autoria: |
SORDI, A.; DIECKOW, J.; BAYER, C.; ALBUQUERQUE, M. A.; PIVA, J. T.; ZANATTA, J. A.; TOMAZI, M.; ROSA, C. M. da; MORAES, A. de. |
|
Afiliação: |
ANDRÉ SORDI, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciência do Solo, UFPR; Jeferson Dieckow, UFPR; Cimélio Bayer, UFRGS; MÁRCIO AMARAL ALBUQUERQUE, Programa de pós-graduação em Ciência do Solo, UFPR; JONATAS THIAGO PIVA, UFSC; JOSILEIA ACORDI ZANATTA, CNPF; Michely Tomazi, UFRGS; CARLA MACHADO DA ROSA, UFRGS; Anibal de Moraes, UFPR. |
|
Título: |
Nitrous oxide emission factors for urine and dung patchesin a subtropical Brazilian pastureland. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2014 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, v. 190, p. 94-103, 2014. |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
tCattle urine and dung (faeces) patches are nitrous oxide (N2O) sources in pasturelands with impactsin the global N2O budget, but specific information about those emissions are still missing for Braziliansubtropical and tropical regions. We conducted a sequence of 3 field-trials (summer, winter and spring,90 days each) to evaluate the N2O emission and emission factor (EF) after the deposition of 3 volumes ofcattle urine or 3 weights of dung (½, 1 and 1½ time the mean urination volume or defecation weight ofFriesian cows) on a free-drained Cambisol of a subtropical pastureland of Brazil. The N2O emission peaks(3198 g N2O-N m−2h−1after urine in summer was the highest) occurred on average 17 ± 9 days afterapplication (DAA), both for urine and dung, and dropped to the background levels 41 ± 10 DAA of urineand 49 ± 10 DAA of dung. The highest contents of NH4+-N in soil (200?250 mg N kg−1) occurred one dayafter urine application and 10?14 days later for dung (100?200 mg N kg−1). Nitrate peaks occurred from23 to 26 DAA in urine patches (∼40?50 mg N kg−1) and 19?50 DAA in dung patches (∼40?50 mg N kg−1).The N2O emission peaks for urine coincided with soil NH4+-N peak in winter but with soil NO3−-N peakin spring. For dung, the emission peak seemed to be more associated with soil NO3−-N than to NH4+-N,either in winter or spring (inorganic-N was not assessed in summer). It was not possible to concludewhether nitrification or denitrification was the dominant process in N2O production, but it seemed thatboth played relevant roles. The EF for urine, averaged across the seasons, diminished with increments inurine volume, from 0.33% in ½ volume to 0.19% in 1½ volume, possibly because urine percolated deeperinto the soil and proportionally less N remained available for N2O production in the top layer. The EFfor dung was 0.19%, 0.12% and 0.14% for ½, 1 and 1½ weight, respectively, showing no clear trend withincrement in dung weight. The lowest EFs for urine and dung occurred in winter, possibly because oflowest temperatures and soil water-filled pore space. The average EF for dung (0.15%) was lower thanthat of urine (0.26%), because urea-N of urine is more readily available for the hydrolysis than organicN forms of dung. This result suggests that these two excreta should be addressed separately in nationalgreenhouse gases inventories or communications. Our results suggest that the default 2% EF proposed inIPCC Guidelines for cattle excreta are overestimated for subtropical Brazil. MenostCattle urine and dung (faeces) patches are nitrous oxide (N2O) sources in pasturelands with impactsin the global N2O budget, but specific information about those emissions are still missing for Braziliansubtropical and tropical regions. We conducted a sequence of 3 field-trials (summer, winter and spring,90 days each) to evaluate the N2O emission and emission factor (EF) after the deposition of 3 volumes ofcattle urine or 3 weights of dung (½, 1 and 1½ time the mean urination volume or defecation weight ofFriesian cows) on a free-drained Cambisol of a subtropical pastureland of Brazil. The N2O emission peaks(3198 g N2O-N m−2h−1after urine in summer was the highest) occurred on average 17 ± 9 days afterapplication (DAA), both for urine and dung, and dropped to the background levels 41 ± 10 DAA of urineand 49 ± 10 DAA of dung. The highest contents of NH4+-N in soil (200?250 mg N kg−1) occurred one dayafter urine application and 10?14 days later for dung (100?200 mg N kg−1). Nitrate peaks occurred from23 to 26 DAA in urine patches (∼40?50 mg N kg−1) and 19?50 DAA in dung patches (∼40?50 mg N kg−1).The N2O emission peaks for urine coincided with soil NH4+-N peak in winter but with soil NO3−-N peakin spring. For dung, the emission peak seemed to be more associated with soil NO3−-N than to NH4+-N,either in winter or spring (inorganic-N was not assessed in summer). It was not possible to concludewhether nitrification or d... Mostrar Tudo |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Fator de emissão; Óxido nitroso; Volume de urina. |
|
Thesagro: |
Gado; Nitrato; Pastagem. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
-- |
|
Marc: |
LEADER 03383naa a2200289 a 4500
001 1999594
005 2014-11-10
008 2014 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
100 1 $aSORDI, A.
245 $aNitrous oxide emission factors for urine and dung patchesin a subtropical Brazilian pastureland.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2014
520 $atCattle urine and dung (faeces) patches are nitrous oxide (N2O) sources in pasturelands with impactsin the global N2O budget, but specific information about those emissions are still missing for Braziliansubtropical and tropical regions. We conducted a sequence of 3 field-trials (summer, winter and spring,90 days each) to evaluate the N2O emission and emission factor (EF) after the deposition of 3 volumes ofcattle urine or 3 weights of dung (½, 1 and 1½ time the mean urination volume or defecation weight ofFriesian cows) on a free-drained Cambisol of a subtropical pastureland of Brazil. The N2O emission peaks(3198 g N2O-N m−2h−1after urine in summer was the highest) occurred on average 17 ± 9 days afterapplication (DAA), both for urine and dung, and dropped to the background levels 41 ± 10 DAA of urineand 49 ± 10 DAA of dung. The highest contents of NH4+-N in soil (200?250 mg N kg−1) occurred one dayafter urine application and 10?14 days later for dung (100?200 mg N kg−1). Nitrate peaks occurred from23 to 26 DAA in urine patches (∼40?50 mg N kg−1) and 19?50 DAA in dung patches (∼40?50 mg N kg−1).The N2O emission peaks for urine coincided with soil NH4+-N peak in winter but with soil NO3−-N peakin spring. For dung, the emission peak seemed to be more associated with soil NO3−-N than to NH4+-N,either in winter or spring (inorganic-N was not assessed in summer). It was not possible to concludewhether nitrification or denitrification was the dominant process in N2O production, but it seemed thatboth played relevant roles. The EF for urine, averaged across the seasons, diminished with increments inurine volume, from 0.33% in ½ volume to 0.19% in 1½ volume, possibly because urine percolated deeperinto the soil and proportionally less N remained available for N2O production in the top layer. The EFfor dung was 0.19%, 0.12% and 0.14% for ½, 1 and 1½ weight, respectively, showing no clear trend withincrement in dung weight. The lowest EFs for urine and dung occurred in winter, possibly because oflowest temperatures and soil water-filled pore space. The average EF for dung (0.15%) was lower thanthat of urine (0.26%), because urea-N of urine is more readily available for the hydrolysis than organicN forms of dung. This result suggests that these two excreta should be addressed separately in nationalgreenhouse gases inventories or communications. Our results suggest that the default 2% EF proposed inIPCC Guidelines for cattle excreta are overestimated for subtropical Brazil.
650 $aGado
650 $aNitrato
650 $aPastagem
653 $aFator de emissão
653 $aÓxido nitroso
653 $aVolume de urina
700 1 $aDIECKOW, J.
700 1 $aBAYER, C.
700 1 $aALBUQUERQUE, M. A.
700 1 $aPIVA, J. T.
700 1 $aZANATTA, J. A.
700 1 $aTOMAZI, M.
700 1 $aROSA, C. M. da
700 1 $aMORAES, A. de
773 $tAgriculture, Ecosystems and Environment$gv. 190, p. 94-103, 2014.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Florestas (CNPF) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
| Expressão de busca inválida. Verifique!!! |
|
|
