| |
|
|
|
Registro Completo |
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Agricultura Digital. |
|
Data corrente: |
22/12/2022 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
22/12/2022 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Anais de Congresso |
|
Autoria: |
RUIZ, R. M.; YANO, I. H.; CASTRO, A. de; VASCONCELOS, J. C. S. |
|
Afiliação: |
RENATO MOTA RUIZ, CENTRO UNIVERSITÁRIO; INACIO HENRIQUE YANO, CNPTIA; ALEXANDRE DE CASTRO, CNPTIA; JULIO CEZAR SOUZA VASCONCELOS, UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DE SÃO CARLOS. |
|
Título: |
Application response time comparison between Ethereum smart contract and SQLite database. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2021 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
In: INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION SYSTEMS AND TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT, 18., 2021, São Paulo. Proceedings and abstracts. São Paulo: FEA/USP, 2021. |
|
DOI: |
10.5748/18CONTECSI/COM/ITM/6787 |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Notas: |
CONTECSI 2021. |
|
Conteúdo: |
This work aims to evaluate the storing and retrieving data response time using an Ethereum Smart Contract application to verify the feasibility of its utilization instead of using relational databases in web application development. To achieve the objectives of this work. There was a comparison between the Ethereum Smart Contract and the SQLite, considering response time as the user experience for database choice decisions in future application development. This study consisted of the development of two similar applications. The first one was the Ethereum Smart Contract Application, and the other was the SQLite Application. Using these applications to build graphs of response time behavior as the number of records processed grows. For storing data Blockchain application was much faster than the SQLite application. When retrieving data, the Blockchain application usually starts slower but finishes faster than the SQLite application. Blockchain is a recent technology for secure data storage in a distributed architecture. The hypothesis to be checked was if it also has a good response time compared with other databases. The contribution of this work is to provide information about the efficiency and possible user satisfaction of Blockchain applications. |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Blockchain; Desempenho; Desenvolvimento de aplicações; Experiência do usuário; Security; Segurança; User experience. |
|
Thesagro: |
Performance. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
-- |
|
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/doc/1150277/1/PC-Application-response-CONTECSI-2021.pdf
|
|
Marc: |
LEADER 02172nam a2200265 a 4500
001 2150277
005 2022-12-22
008 2021 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
024 7 $a10.5748/18CONTECSI/COM/ITM/6787$2DOI
100 1 $aRUIZ, R. M.
245 $aApplication response time comparison between Ethereum smart contract and SQLite database.$h[electronic resource]
260 $aIn: INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION SYSTEMS AND TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT, 18., 2021, São Paulo. Proceedings and abstracts. São Paulo: FEA/USP$c2021
500 $aCONTECSI 2021.
520 $aThis work aims to evaluate the storing and retrieving data response time using an Ethereum Smart Contract application to verify the feasibility of its utilization instead of using relational databases in web application development. To achieve the objectives of this work. There was a comparison between the Ethereum Smart Contract and the SQLite, considering response time as the user experience for database choice decisions in future application development. This study consisted of the development of two similar applications. The first one was the Ethereum Smart Contract Application, and the other was the SQLite Application. Using these applications to build graphs of response time behavior as the number of records processed grows. For storing data Blockchain application was much faster than the SQLite application. When retrieving data, the Blockchain application usually starts slower but finishes faster than the SQLite application. Blockchain is a recent technology for secure data storage in a distributed architecture. The hypothesis to be checked was if it also has a good response time compared with other databases. The contribution of this work is to provide information about the efficiency and possible user satisfaction of Blockchain applications.
650 $aPerformance
653 $aBlockchain
653 $aDesempenho
653 $aDesenvolvimento de aplicações
653 $aExperiência do usuário
653 $aSecurity
653 $aSegurança
653 $aUser experience
700 1 $aYANO, I. H.
700 1 $aCASTRO, A. de
700 1 $aVASCONCELOS, J. C. S.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Agricultura Digital (CNPTIA) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
URL |
Voltar
|
|
|
| Registros recuperados : 94 | |
| Registros recuperados : 94 | |
|
| Nenhum registro encontrado para a expressão de busca informada. |
|
|
