Registro Completo |
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Mandioca e Fruticultura. |
Data corrente: |
31/08/1995 |
Data da última atualização: |
31/08/1995 |
Autoria: |
CASTLE, W. S.; PHILLPS, R. L. |
Afiliação: |
Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, Agricultural Research and Education Center, P.O. Box 1088, Lake Alfred, FL 33850. |
Título: |
Potentially dwarfing rootstocks for florida citrus. |
Ano de publicação: |
1977 |
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Reprinted from Proc. Int. Soc. Citriculture, v.2, p.558-561, 1977. |
Idioma: |
Inglês |
Conteúdo: |
Several field tests were established in 1968 to determine which rootstocks showed potential for dwarfing `Valencia' orange (Citrus sinensis(L.) Obs.) and `Marsh' grape-fruit (C. paradisi Macf.) trees. The plantings are located on deep well-drained soils of the central "Ridge" and shallow, poorly drained soils of the east coast citrus areas of Florida. Trees were classified by canopy volume and height and their production efficiency was compared on the basis of yield per unit of canopy volume. Trees on nearly all rootstocks were smaller than those on the standard for comparison, rough lemon (C. jambhiri Lush.). The more promising rootstocks include Rubidoux trifoliate orange (Poncirus trifoliata (L.) Raf.) Rusk citrange (P. trifoliata x C.sinensis), Rangpur lime (C. limonia Obs.) x Troyer citrange, koethen sweet orange x Rubidoux trifoliate orange, and Procimequt?[(C. aurantifolia (Christm.) Swing. x Fortunella japonica (Thunb.) Swing.) x F. hindisii (Champ) Swing.]. |
Palavras-Chave: |
Citrange; Kumquat; Tree size; Trifoliate orange. |
Categoria do assunto: |
-- |
Marc: |
LEADER 01463naa a2200181 a 4500 001 1646935 005 1995-08-31 008 1977 bl --- 0-- u #d 100 1 $aCASTLE, W. S. 245 $aPotentially dwarfing rootstocks for florida citrus. 260 $c1977 520 $aSeveral field tests were established in 1968 to determine which rootstocks showed potential for dwarfing `Valencia' orange (Citrus sinensis(L.) Obs.) and `Marsh' grape-fruit (C. paradisi Macf.) trees. The plantings are located on deep well-drained soils of the central "Ridge" and shallow, poorly drained soils of the east coast citrus areas of Florida. Trees were classified by canopy volume and height and their production efficiency was compared on the basis of yield per unit of canopy volume. Trees on nearly all rootstocks were smaller than those on the standard for comparison, rough lemon (C. jambhiri Lush.). The more promising rootstocks include Rubidoux trifoliate orange (Poncirus trifoliata (L.) Raf.) Rusk citrange (P. trifoliata x C.sinensis), Rangpur lime (C. limonia Obs.) x Troyer citrange, koethen sweet orange x Rubidoux trifoliate orange, and Procimequt?[(C. aurantifolia (Christm.) Swing. x Fortunella japonica (Thunb.) Swing.) x F. hindisii (Champ) Swing.]. 653 $aCitrange 653 $aKumquat 653 $aTree size 653 $aTrifoliate orange 700 1 $aPHILLPS, R. L. 773 $tReprinted from Proc. Int. Soc. Citriculture$gv.2, p.558-561, 1977.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
Registro original: |
Embrapa Mandioca e Fruticultura (CNPMF) |
|