| |
|
|
|
Registro Completo |
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Solos. |
|
Data corrente: |
15/12/2021 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
17/12/2021 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Anais de Congresso |
|
Autoria: |
LANDERS, J. N.; FREITAS, P. L. de; CARVALHO, M. O. de; SILVA NETO, S. P. da; RALISCH, R. |
|
Afiliação: |
JOHN N. LANDERS, FEBRAPDP; PEDRO LUIZ DE FREITAS, CNPS; MAURICIO O. DE CARVALHO, MAPA; SEBASTIAO PEDRO DA SILVA NETO, CPAC; RICARDO RALISCH, UEL. |
|
Título: |
Conservation agriculture (CA) has to move on. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2021 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
In: WORLD CONGRESS ON CONSERVATION AGRICULTURE, 8., 2021, Bern, Switzerland. The future of farming: profitable and sustainable farming with conservation agriculture. Brussels: European Conservation Agriculture Federation, 2021. Evento online. |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
After nearly five decades, zero tillage (no-till), the bedrock of CA, is dejá vu in Brazil. But CA is not just leaving the soil protected with residues or cover crops and planting/drilling crops through them, quality CA also requires a pluri-annual rotation, frequently absent. It is also evolving by incorporating new compatible and sustainable technologies. Farmers, including organic ones, are learning how to incorporate innovative biological and mechanical methods for disease, pest and weed controls, reducing pesticide and fertilizer use; the Farmer Responsibility Index underlines significant recent reductions in chemical hazards. As consumers demand greater food traceability, certification and benchmarking will continue to expand, while increasing complexities in soil, water, crop and livestock management are demanding higher skill levels and widespread use of specialized consultants. The success and longevity of the CA movement will depend on incorporating and promoting new compatible and sustainable technologies, such as biological controls, precision agriculture, controlled traffic farming, and drones for scouting and spot spraying. CA then provides land use intensification to reduce horizontal expansion, improved aquifer re-charge, erosion control and other important environmental benefits, plus increased profit and lower food prices, with less negative environmental impacts. Historically, the environment has suffered, therefore, the above urgently requires more promulgation, backed by research. To expand the scope, and hence the definition, of CA, the following questions need to be addressed: (i) can CA become the umbrella definition for all these technologies; and, (ii) how do we adjust the concept to achieve this? One approach would be a CA base definition, with clarifying adjustments, and a list of approved compatible technologies. A challenge that needs to be addressed js from the novel label "Re-generative Agriculture" (RA), not yet scientifically defined but clearly based on CA principles. One approach would be to recognize CA as a sine qua non of agricultural sustainability, especially in the tropics, and the need to define additional science-based technologies that differentiate new labels from CA. MenosAfter nearly five decades, zero tillage (no-till), the bedrock of CA, is dejá vu in Brazil. But CA is not just leaving the soil protected with residues or cover crops and planting/drilling crops through them, quality CA also requires a pluri-annual rotation, frequently absent. It is also evolving by incorporating new compatible and sustainable technologies. Farmers, including organic ones, are learning how to incorporate innovative biological and mechanical methods for disease, pest and weed controls, reducing pesticide and fertilizer use; the Farmer Responsibility Index underlines significant recent reductions in chemical hazards. As consumers demand greater food traceability, certification and benchmarking will continue to expand, while increasing complexities in soil, water, crop and livestock management are demanding higher skill levels and widespread use of specialized consultants. The success and longevity of the CA movement will depend on incorporating and promoting new compatible and sustainable technologies, such as biological controls, precision agriculture, controlled traffic farming, and drones for scouting and spot spraying. CA then provides land use intensification to reduce horizontal expansion, improved aquifer re-charge, erosion control and other important environmental benefits, plus increased profit and lower food prices, with less negative environmental impacts. Historically, the environment has suffered, therefore, the above urgently requires more ... Mostrar Tudo |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Agricultural sustainability; Farmer responsibility index; Innovative technologies; Land use intensification; Organic agriculture. |
|
Thesagro: |
Agricultura. |
|
Thesaurus Nal: |
Environmental impact. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
P Recursos Naturais, Ciências Ambientais e da Terra |
|
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/item/229221/1/Conservation-agriculture-CA-has-to-move-on-2021.pdf
|
|
Marc: |
LEADER 03182nam a2200241 a 4500
001 2137867
005 2021-12-17
008 2021 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
100 1 $aLANDERS, J. N.
245 $aConservation agriculture (CA) has to move on.$h[electronic resource]
260 $aIn: WORLD CONGRESS ON CONSERVATION AGRICULTURE, 8., 2021, Bern, Switzerland. The future of farming: profitable and sustainable farming with conservation agriculture. Brussels: European Conservation Agriculture Federation, 2021. Evento online.$c2021
520 $aAfter nearly five decades, zero tillage (no-till), the bedrock of CA, is dejá vu in Brazil. But CA is not just leaving the soil protected with residues or cover crops and planting/drilling crops through them, quality CA also requires a pluri-annual rotation, frequently absent. It is also evolving by incorporating new compatible and sustainable technologies. Farmers, including organic ones, are learning how to incorporate innovative biological and mechanical methods for disease, pest and weed controls, reducing pesticide and fertilizer use; the Farmer Responsibility Index underlines significant recent reductions in chemical hazards. As consumers demand greater food traceability, certification and benchmarking will continue to expand, while increasing complexities in soil, water, crop and livestock management are demanding higher skill levels and widespread use of specialized consultants. The success and longevity of the CA movement will depend on incorporating and promoting new compatible and sustainable technologies, such as biological controls, precision agriculture, controlled traffic farming, and drones for scouting and spot spraying. CA then provides land use intensification to reduce horizontal expansion, improved aquifer re-charge, erosion control and other important environmental benefits, plus increased profit and lower food prices, with less negative environmental impacts. Historically, the environment has suffered, therefore, the above urgently requires more promulgation, backed by research. To expand the scope, and hence the definition, of CA, the following questions need to be addressed: (i) can CA become the umbrella definition for all these technologies; and, (ii) how do we adjust the concept to achieve this? One approach would be a CA base definition, with clarifying adjustments, and a list of approved compatible technologies. A challenge that needs to be addressed js from the novel label "Re-generative Agriculture" (RA), not yet scientifically defined but clearly based on CA principles. One approach would be to recognize CA as a sine qua non of agricultural sustainability, especially in the tropics, and the need to define additional science-based technologies that differentiate new labels from CA.
650 $aEnvironmental impact
650 $aAgricultura
653 $aAgricultural sustainability
653 $aFarmer responsibility index
653 $aInnovative technologies
653 $aLand use intensification
653 $aOrganic agriculture
700 1 $aFREITAS, P. L. de
700 1 $aCARVALHO, M. O. de
700 1 $aSILVA NETO, S. P. da
700 1 $aRALISCH, R.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Solos (CNPS) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
URL |
Voltar
|
|
|
Registro Completo
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Clima Temperado. |
|
Data corrente: |
01/11/2011 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
06/07/2012 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Circular Técnica |
|
Autoria: |
EMYGDIO, B. M.; OLIVEIRA, A. C. B. de; MACHADO, J. R. de A.; MEIRELES, W. F.; BACKES, R. L.; PEREIRA, F. R.; GUADAGNIN, J. P. |
|
Afiliação: |
BEATRIZ MARTI EMYGDIO, CPACT; ANA CLAUDIA BARNECHE DE OLIVEIRA, CPACT; JANE RODRIGUES DE ASSIS MACHADO, CNPMS; Walter Fernandes Meireles; Rogério Luiz Backes, EPAGRI; Fernando Rocha Pereira, Agropastoril; José Paulo Guadagnin, FEPAGRO. |
|
Título: |
Recomendação de variedades de milho para o Sul do Brasil: rede de ensaios preliminares-Safra 2009/10. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2010 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Pelotas: Embrapa Clima Temperado, 2010. |
|
Páginas: |
8 P. |
|
Série: |
(Embrapa Clima Temperado. Circular Técnica, 99.) |
|
Idioma: |
Português |
|
Thesagro: |
Variedade. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
-- |
|
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/item/45104/1/circular-99.pdf
|
|
Marc: |
LEADER 00642nam a2200205 a 4500
001 1904566
005 2012-07-06
008 2010 bl uuuu u0uu1 u #d
100 1 $aEMYGDIO, B. M.
245 $aRecomendação de variedades de milho para o Sul do Brasil$brede de ensaios preliminares-Safra 2009/10.
260 $aPelotas: Embrapa Clima Temperado$c2010
300 $a8 P.
490 $a(Embrapa Clima Temperado. Circular Técnica, 99.)
650 $aVariedade
700 1 $aOLIVEIRA, A. C. B. de
700 1 $aMACHADO, J. R. de A.
700 1 $aMEIRELES, W. F.
700 1 $aBACKES, R. L.
700 1 $aPEREIRA, F. R.
700 1 $aGUADAGNIN, J. P.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Clima Temperado (CPACT) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
| Expressão de busca inválida. Verifique!!! |
|
|
