|
|
Registro Completo |
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Acre. |
Data corrente: |
15/04/1997 |
Data da última atualização: |
23/05/2023 |
Autoria: |
CAMPOS, I. S.; MEDEIROS, J. A. V. |
Afiliação: |
IVANDIR SOARES CAMPOS, CPAF-AC; JESSE AD VINCULA MEDEIROS, CPAF-AC. |
Título: |
Avaliação de métodos de acondicionamento de arroz no campo para as condições climáticas do Acre. |
Ano de publicação: |
1982 |
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Rio Branco, AC: Embrapa-UEPAE Rio Branco, 1982. |
Páginas: |
5 p. |
Série: |
(Embrapa-UEPAE Rio Branco. Pesquisa em andamento, 11). |
Idioma: |
Português |
Conteúdo: |
Este estudo avalia os diferentes métodos de acondicionamento de arroz no campo para as condições climáticas do Acre. |
Palavras-Chave: |
Acre; Amazonia Occidental; Amazônia Ocidental; Calidad del grano; Factores ambientales; Granos almacenados; Western Amazon. |
Thesagro: |
Armazenamento; Arroz; Condição Ambiental; Conservação; Oryza Sativa. |
Thesaurus Nal: |
Environmental factors; Grain quality; Rice; Stored grain. |
Categoria do assunto: |
Q Alimentos e Nutrição Humana |
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/item/131370/1/1093.pdf
|
Marc: |
LEADER 01117nam a2200337 a 4500 001 1492364 005 2023-05-23 008 1982 bl uuuu u0uu1 u #d 100 1 $aCAMPOS, I. S. 245 $aAvaliação de métodos de acondicionamento de arroz no campo para as condições climáticas do Acre.$h[electronic resource] 260 $aRio Branco, AC: Embrapa-UEPAE Rio Branco$c1982 300 $a5 p. 490 $a(Embrapa-UEPAE Rio Branco. Pesquisa em andamento, 11). 520 $aEste estudo avalia os diferentes métodos de acondicionamento de arroz no campo para as condições climáticas do Acre. 650 $aEnvironmental factors 650 $aGrain quality 650 $aRice 650 $aStored grain 650 $aArmazenamento 650 $aArroz 650 $aCondição Ambiental 650 $aConservação 650 $aOryza Sativa 653 $aAcre 653 $aAmazonia Occidental 653 $aAmazônia Ocidental 653 $aCalidad del grano 653 $aFactores ambientales 653 $aGranos almacenados 653 $aWestern Amazon 700 1 $aMEDEIROS, J. A. V.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
Registro original: |
Embrapa Acre (CPAF-AC) |
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
URL |
Voltar
|
|
Registro Completo
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Agrossilvipastoril. |
Data corrente: |
19/02/2021 |
Data da última atualização: |
19/02/2021 |
Tipo da produção científica: |
Resumo em Anais de Congresso |
Autoria: |
PEDREIRA, B. C. e; CARVALHO, A. P.; PARAISO, I.; SILVA, D.; DOMICIANO, L. F.; CABRAL, L.; PEREIRA, D. H.; SOLLENBERGER, L. E. |
Afiliação: |
BRUNO CARNEIRO E PEDREIRA, CPAMT; ANA PAULA CARVALHO, UFMT, Sinop-MT; ISADORA PARAISO, UFMT, Sinop-MT; DÉBORA SILVA, UFMT, Sinop-MT; LEANDRO FERREIRA DOMICIANO, UFMT, Cuiabá-MT; LUCIANO CABRAL, UFMT, Sinop-MT; DALTON HENRIQUE PEREIRA, UFMT, Sinop-MT; LYNN E. SOLLENBERGER, UNIVERSITY of FLORIDA, Gainsville-FL. |
Título: |
Forage production and animal performance of Ipyporã and Mulato II Brachiariagrasses under continuous stocking. |
Ano de publicação: |
2020 |
Fonte/Imprenta: |
In: ASA, CSSA & SSSA INTERNATIONAL ANNUAL MEETING, 2020, San Antonio. Embracing the digital environment: abstracts [eletrônico]... Phoenix: ASA; CSSA; SSSA, 2020. |
Idioma: |
Inglês |
Conteúdo: |
In the last two decades breeders have focused on hybridization within the grass genus Brachiaria in order to integrate the most outstanding characteristics of several species to enhance animal performance in forage-livestock system, especially when addressing edaphoclimatic conditions and pest susceptibility. The objective of this study was to compare herbage accumulation, nutritive value, and animal performance of ?Ipyporã? [B. ruziziensis Germ. & Evrard × B. brizantha (Hochst. ex A. Rich.) Stapf] and ?Mulato II? (B. ruziziensis × B. brizantha× B. decumbens Stapf) brachiariagrasses in the Brazilian Amazon biome. All experimental units were continuously stocked using a variable stocking rate from May 2016 to May 2018. Herbage accumulation (HA) was greater in Mulato II (17,370 kg DM ha?1) than Ipyporã (14,930 kg DM ha?1), resulting in 25 and 23% greater stocking rate (SR) and gain ha?1 than Ipyporã, respectively. Herbage allowance did not differ between grasses (averaging 6.52 kg DM kg?1 BW). The crude protein (CP), neutral (NDF), and acid (ADF) detergent fiber concentrations did not differ between cultivars (P > 0.05). Greater annual HA and gain ha-1 for Mulato II support its use in intensive forage-based systems. However, susceptibility of Mulato II to spittlebug requires regular monitoring and treatment in regions like the Amazon biome, where risk of spittlebug damage is great. In contrast, spittlebug-resistant Ipyporã can provide excellent plant and animal response with no spittlebug risk, offering a sustainable alternative to Mulato II for forage diversification. MenosIn the last two decades breeders have focused on hybridization within the grass genus Brachiaria in order to integrate the most outstanding characteristics of several species to enhance animal performance in forage-livestock system, especially when addressing edaphoclimatic conditions and pest susceptibility. The objective of this study was to compare herbage accumulation, nutritive value, and animal performance of ?Ipyporã? [B. ruziziensis Germ. & Evrard × B. brizantha (Hochst. ex A. Rich.) Stapf] and ?Mulato II? (B. ruziziensis × B. brizantha× B. decumbens Stapf) brachiariagrasses in the Brazilian Amazon biome. All experimental units were continuously stocked using a variable stocking rate from May 2016 to May 2018. Herbage accumulation (HA) was greater in Mulato II (17,370 kg DM ha?1) than Ipyporã (14,930 kg DM ha?1), resulting in 25 and 23% greater stocking rate (SR) and gain ha?1 than Ipyporã, respectively. Herbage allowance did not differ between grasses (averaging 6.52 kg DM kg?1 BW). The crude protein (CP), neutral (NDF), and acid (ADF) detergent fiber concentrations did not differ between cultivars (P > 0.05). Greater annual HA and gain ha-1 for Mulato II support its use in intensive forage-based systems. However, susceptibility of Mulato II to spittlebug requires regular monitoring and treatment in regions like the Amazon biome, where risk of spittlebug damage is great. In contrast, spittlebug-resistant Ipyporã can provide excellent plant and animal response with n... Mostrar Tudo |
Palavras-Chave: |
BRS RB331; Ipyporã; Mato Grosso; Mulato II; Sinop-MT. |
Thesagro: |
Brachiaria Ruziziensis; Forragem. |
Thesaurus NAL: |
Amazonia; Animal performance; Forage. |
Categoria do assunto: |
F Plantas e Produtos de Origem Vegetal |
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/item/221334/1/2020-cpamt-bcp-forage-animal-performance-ipypora-mulato-ii-brachiariagrasses-continuous-stocking.pdf
|
Marc: |
LEADER 02595nam a2200313 a 4500 001 2130142 005 2021-02-19 008 2020 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d 100 1 $aPEDREIRA, B. C. e 245 $aForage production and animal performance of Ipyporã and Mulato II Brachiariagrasses under continuous stocking.$h[electronic resource] 260 $aIn: ASA, CSSA & SSSA INTERNATIONAL ANNUAL MEETING, 2020, San Antonio. Embracing the digital environment: abstracts [eletrônico]... Phoenix: ASA; CSSA; SSSA$c2020 520 $aIn the last two decades breeders have focused on hybridization within the grass genus Brachiaria in order to integrate the most outstanding characteristics of several species to enhance animal performance in forage-livestock system, especially when addressing edaphoclimatic conditions and pest susceptibility. The objective of this study was to compare herbage accumulation, nutritive value, and animal performance of ?Ipyporã? [B. ruziziensis Germ. & Evrard × B. brizantha (Hochst. ex A. Rich.) Stapf] and ?Mulato II? (B. ruziziensis × B. brizantha× B. decumbens Stapf) brachiariagrasses in the Brazilian Amazon biome. All experimental units were continuously stocked using a variable stocking rate from May 2016 to May 2018. Herbage accumulation (HA) was greater in Mulato II (17,370 kg DM ha?1) than Ipyporã (14,930 kg DM ha?1), resulting in 25 and 23% greater stocking rate (SR) and gain ha?1 than Ipyporã, respectively. Herbage allowance did not differ between grasses (averaging 6.52 kg DM kg?1 BW). The crude protein (CP), neutral (NDF), and acid (ADF) detergent fiber concentrations did not differ between cultivars (P > 0.05). Greater annual HA and gain ha-1 for Mulato II support its use in intensive forage-based systems. However, susceptibility of Mulato II to spittlebug requires regular monitoring and treatment in regions like the Amazon biome, where risk of spittlebug damage is great. In contrast, spittlebug-resistant Ipyporã can provide excellent plant and animal response with no spittlebug risk, offering a sustainable alternative to Mulato II for forage diversification. 650 $aAmazonia 650 $aAnimal performance 650 $aForage 650 $aBrachiaria Ruziziensis 650 $aForragem 653 $aBRS RB331 653 $aIpyporã 653 $aMato Grosso 653 $aMulato II 653 $aSinop-MT 700 1 $aCARVALHO, A. P. 700 1 $aPARAISO, I. 700 1 $aSILVA, D. 700 1 $aDOMICIANO, L. F. 700 1 $aCABRAL, L. 700 1 $aPEREIRA, D. H. 700 1 $aSOLLENBERGER, L. E.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
Registro original: |
Embrapa Agrossilvipastoril (CPAMT) |
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
Nenhum registro encontrado para a expressão de busca informada. |
|
|