| |
|
|
 | Acesso ao texto completo restrito à biblioteca da Embrapa Instrumentação. Para informações adicionais entre em contato com cnpdia.biblioteca@embrapa.br. |
|
Registro Completo |
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Instrumentação. |
|
Data corrente: |
21/09/2021 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
10/06/2022 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
|
Autoria: |
CÔNSOLO, N. R. B.; SILVA, J.; BUARQUE, V. M.; BARBOSA, L. C.; PADILLA, A. H.; COLNAGO, L. A.; SARAN NETTO, A.; GERRARD, D. E.; SILVA, S. L. |
|
Afiliação: |
LUIZ ALBERTO COLNAGO, CNPDIA. |
|
Título: |
Metabolomic signature of genetic potential for muscularity in beef cattle. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2021 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Animal Biotechnology, v. 32, n. 4 , 2021. |
|
Páginas: |
1 - 11 |
|
DOI: |
https://doi.org/10.1080/10495398.2021.1894164 |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
The aim of this study was to investigate the serum and meat metabolomic changes according to the genetic potential for muscularity of non-castrated Nellore males and its association with phenotypic traits. Forty-eight non-castrated Nellore males were separated into two groups based on their genetic potential for post-weaning muscularity: high (HM) and low (LM). Selection for muscularity did not cause noticeable differences in the traits evaluated during the finishing phase and after slaughter. However, several metabolites in meat and serum, have changed according to the muscularity group. HM animals presented an over-abundance of glycerol, glutamine, choline, methylhistidine, betaine, creatinine and methionine in serum, compared with their LM counterparts. Similarly, the meat samples of HM animals were rich in glucose-6-phosphate, lactate, pyruvate, creatinine, betaine, choline, glycerol and arginine relative to LM bulls. Inosine monophosphate was the only metabolite over-abundant in LM animals. In conclusion, the genetic potential for post-weaning muscularity did not affect performance during the finishing phase, carcass traits and meat quality. However, multivariate analysis shows that the genetic potential of muscularity can be correlated with serum lipid and protein metabolites, and with energy metabolism in meat, providing a footprint of cattle muscularity metabolism. |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Genetic selection; Muscularity potential; Nuclear magnetic resonance. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
-- |
|
Marc: |
LEADER 02209naa a2200277 a 4500
001 2134634
005 2022-06-10
008 2021 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
024 7 $ahttps://doi.org/10.1080/10495398.2021.1894164$2DOI
100 1 $aCÔNSOLO, N. R. B.
245 $aMetabolomic signature of genetic potential for muscularity in beef cattle.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2021
300 $a1 - 11
520 $aThe aim of this study was to investigate the serum and meat metabolomic changes according to the genetic potential for muscularity of non-castrated Nellore males and its association with phenotypic traits. Forty-eight non-castrated Nellore males were separated into two groups based on their genetic potential for post-weaning muscularity: high (HM) and low (LM). Selection for muscularity did not cause noticeable differences in the traits evaluated during the finishing phase and after slaughter. However, several metabolites in meat and serum, have changed according to the muscularity group. HM animals presented an over-abundance of glycerol, glutamine, choline, methylhistidine, betaine, creatinine and methionine in serum, compared with their LM counterparts. Similarly, the meat samples of HM animals were rich in glucose-6-phosphate, lactate, pyruvate, creatinine, betaine, choline, glycerol and arginine relative to LM bulls. Inosine monophosphate was the only metabolite over-abundant in LM animals. In conclusion, the genetic potential for post-weaning muscularity did not affect performance during the finishing phase, carcass traits and meat quality. However, multivariate analysis shows that the genetic potential of muscularity can be correlated with serum lipid and protein metabolites, and with energy metabolism in meat, providing a footprint of cattle muscularity metabolism.
653 $aGenetic selection
653 $aMuscularity potential
653 $aNuclear magnetic resonance
700 1 $aSILVA, J.
700 1 $aBUARQUE, V. M.
700 1 $aBARBOSA, L. C.
700 1 $aPADILLA, A. H.
700 1 $aCOLNAGO, L. A.
700 1 $aSARAN NETTO, A.
700 1 $aGERRARD, D. E.
700 1 $aSILVA, S. L.
773 $tAnimal Biotechnology$gv. 32, n. 4 , 2021.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Instrumentação (CNPDIA) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
URL |
Voltar
|
|
|
| Acesso ao texto completo restrito à biblioteca da Embrapa Caprinos e Ovinos. Para informações adicionais entre em contato com cnpc.biblioteca@embrapa.br. |
Registro Completo
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Caprinos e Ovinos. |
|
Data corrente: |
12/01/2021 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
10/08/2021 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
|
Circulação/Nível: |
A - 2 |
|
Autoria: |
SOUZA-FABJANA, J. M. G.; BATISTA, R. I. T. P.; CORREIA, L. F. L; PARAMIO, M. T.; FONSECA, J. F. da; FREITAS, V. J. F.; MERMILLOD, P. |
|
Afiliação: |
JOANNA M. G. SOUZA-FABJANA, Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF) - Niterói, RJ, Brazil.; RIBRIO I. T. P. BATISTA, Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF) - Niterói, RJ, Brazil.; LUCAS F. L. CORREIA, Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF) - Niterói, RJ, Brazil.; MARIA TERESA PARAMIO, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona - Cerdanyola del Valles, Barcelona, Spain; JEFERSON FERREIRA DA FONSECA, CNPC; VICENTE J. F. FREITAS, Universidade Estadual do Ceara (UECe) - Fortaleza, CE, Brazil; PASCAL MERMILLOD, Institut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l?Environnement (INRAE) - Physiologie de la Reproduction et des Comportements, Nouzilly, France. |
|
Título: |
In vitro production of small ruminant embryos: latest improvements and further research. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2021 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Reproduction, Fertility and Development, v. 33, n. 2, p. 31-54, Jan. 2021. |
|
DOI: |
https://doi.org/10.1071/RD20206 |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
Abstract: This review presents the latest advances in and main obstacles to the application of in vitro embryo production (IVEP) systems in small ruminants. This biotechnology is an extremely important tool for genetic improvement for livestock and is essential for the establishment of other biotechnologies, such as cloning and transgenesis. At present, the IVEP market is almost non-existent for small ruminants, in contrast with the trends observed in cattle. This is probably related to the lower added value of small ruminants, lower commercial demand and fewer qualified professionals interested in this area. Moreover, there are fewer research groups working on small ruminant IVEP than those working with cattle and pigs. The heterogeneity of oocytes collected from growing follicles in live females or from ovaries collected from abattoirs remains a challenge for IVEP dissemination in goats and sheep. Of note, although the logistics of oocyte collection from live small ruminant females are more complex than in the bovine, in general the IVEP outcomes, in terms of blastocyst production, are similar. We anticipate that after appropriate training and repeatable results, the commercial demand for small ruminant in vitro-produced embryos may increase. |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Animal biotechnology; IVF; IVM; MOET; Reproductive biotechniques. |
|
Thesaurus NAL: |
Breeding and Genetic Improvement; Embryo transfer; Goats; Sheep; Small ruminants. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
L Ciência Animal e Produtos de Origem Animal |
|
Marc: |
LEADER 02233naa a2200325 a 4500
001 2129226
005 2021-08-10
008 2021 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
024 7 $ahttps://doi.org/10.1071/RD20206$2DOI
100 1 $aSOUZA-FABJANA, J. M. G.
245 $aIn vitro production of small ruminant embryos$blatest improvements and further research.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2021
520 $aAbstract: This review presents the latest advances in and main obstacles to the application of in vitro embryo production (IVEP) systems in small ruminants. This biotechnology is an extremely important tool for genetic improvement for livestock and is essential for the establishment of other biotechnologies, such as cloning and transgenesis. At present, the IVEP market is almost non-existent for small ruminants, in contrast with the trends observed in cattle. This is probably related to the lower added value of small ruminants, lower commercial demand and fewer qualified professionals interested in this area. Moreover, there are fewer research groups working on small ruminant IVEP than those working with cattle and pigs. The heterogeneity of oocytes collected from growing follicles in live females or from ovaries collected from abattoirs remains a challenge for IVEP dissemination in goats and sheep. Of note, although the logistics of oocyte collection from live small ruminant females are more complex than in the bovine, in general the IVEP outcomes, in terms of blastocyst production, are similar. We anticipate that after appropriate training and repeatable results, the commercial demand for small ruminant in vitro-produced embryos may increase.
650 $aBreeding and Genetic Improvement
650 $aEmbryo transfer
650 $aGoats
650 $aSheep
650 $aSmall ruminants
653 $aAnimal biotechnology
653 $aIVF
653 $aIVM
653 $aMOET
653 $aReproductive biotechniques
700 1 $aBATISTA, R. I. T. P.
700 1 $aCORREIA, L. F. L
700 1 $aPARAMIO, M. T.
700 1 $aFONSECA, J. F. da
700 1 $aFREITAS, V. J. F.
700 1 $aMERMILLOD, P.
773 $tReproduction, Fertility and Development$gv. 33, n. 2, p. 31-54, Jan. 2021.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Caprinos e Ovinos (CNPC) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
| Nenhum registro encontrado para a expressão de busca informada. |
|
|
