| |
|
|
|
Registro Completo |
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Pesca e Aquicultura. |
|
Data corrente: |
03/02/2022 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
03/02/2022 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Anais de Congresso |
|
Autoria: |
BRITO, R. F. F. de; SANTOS, A. C. dos; ALMEIDA, R. E. M. de; ARAUJO, R. P.; SILVA, E. H.; SOUSA, L. F.; SANTOS, J. G. D.; ANDRÉ, T. B.; GOMES FILHO, P. H.; LINO, W. S. |
|
Afiliação: |
RAIMUNDO FILHO FREIRE DE BRITO, UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DO TOCANTINS; ANTONIO CLEMENTINO DOS SANTOS, UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DO TOCANTINS; RODRIGO ESTEVAM MUNHOZ DE ALMEIDA, CNPASA; RAPHAEL PAVESI ARAUJO, INSTITUTO FEDERAL DO TOCANTINS; ESDRAS HENRIQUE SILVA, INSTITUTO FEDERAL DO TOCANTINS; LUCIANO FERNANDES SOUSA, UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DO TOCANTINS; JOSÉ GERALDO DONIZETTI DOS SANTOS, UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DO TOCANTINS; TIAGO BARBALHO ANDRÉ, UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DO TOCANTINS; PAULO HUMBERTO GOMES FILHO, UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DO TOCANTINS; WARLEY SILVA LINO, INTITUTO FEDERAL DO TOCANTINS. |
|
Título: |
Geometric arrangement of corn+palisade grass in crop-livestock integration system. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2021 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
In: WORLD CONGRESS ON INTEGRATED CROP-LIVESTOCK-FORESTRY SYSTEMS, 2., 2021. Proceedings reference. Brasília, DF: Embrapa, 2021. |
|
Páginas: |
p. 471-474. |
|
ISBN: |
978-65-994135-4-4 |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Notas: |
WCCLF 2021. Evento online. |
|
Conteúdo: |
The production systems have been modified due to greater sustainability. The intercropped corn crops with Urochloa ruziziensis provide biomass that can be used as straw in sequential crops, favoring the intensification of productive areas. Investigating and proposing a phytotechnical arrangement between corn and brachiaria is important to favor the production of forage / grain, and consequently animal production, by minimizing the negative effects of forage shading and maximizing grain productivity. This study was conducted in Colinas do Tocantins, Brazil. The experimental design was in complete randomized blocks in a factorial scheme (2x2x2). The treatments consisted of three factors: 1- corn seeding spacing (0.45m and 0.90m); 2- planting orientation (north-south and east-west); 3- forage planting method (corn planting line and in between corn planting line). Corn grain yield, forage dry matter yield and grass height were evaluated on the day of the corn harvest. The yield of corn grains and dry mass of forage, does not depend on the spacing and orientation of the planting of corn. The height of the grass at the time of the corn harvest shows significant differences. |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Integrated crop-livestock systems. |
|
Thesagro: |
Biomassa; Capim Urochloa; Milho; Sistema de Cultivo. |
|
Thesaurus Nal: |
Biomass; Corn; Economic productivity; Integrated crop management; Intercropping; Planting; Row spacing; Urochloa ruziziensis. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
F Plantas e Produtos de Origem Vegetal |
|
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/item/230836/1/pl-wcclf-2021-2.pdf
|
|
Marc: |
LEADER 02425nam a2200409 a 4500
001 2139626
005 2022-02-03
008 2021 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
020 $a978-65-994135-4-4
100 1 $aBRITO, R. F. F. de
245 $aGeometric arrangement of corn+palisade grass in crop-livestock integration system.$h[electronic resource]
260 $aIn: WORLD CONGRESS ON INTEGRATED CROP-LIVESTOCK-FORESTRY SYSTEMS, 2., 2021. Proceedings reference. Brasília, DF: Embrapa$c2021
300 $ap. 471-474.
500 $aWCCLF 2021. Evento online.
520 $aThe production systems have been modified due to greater sustainability. The intercropped corn crops with Urochloa ruziziensis provide biomass that can be used as straw in sequential crops, favoring the intensification of productive areas. Investigating and proposing a phytotechnical arrangement between corn and brachiaria is important to favor the production of forage / grain, and consequently animal production, by minimizing the negative effects of forage shading and maximizing grain productivity. This study was conducted in Colinas do Tocantins, Brazil. The experimental design was in complete randomized blocks in a factorial scheme (2x2x2). The treatments consisted of three factors: 1- corn seeding spacing (0.45m and 0.90m); 2- planting orientation (north-south and east-west); 3- forage planting method (corn planting line and in between corn planting line). Corn grain yield, forage dry matter yield and grass height were evaluated on the day of the corn harvest. The yield of corn grains and dry mass of forage, does not depend on the spacing and orientation of the planting of corn. The height of the grass at the time of the corn harvest shows significant differences.
650 $aBiomass
650 $aCorn
650 $aEconomic productivity
650 $aIntegrated crop management
650 $aIntercropping
650 $aPlanting
650 $aRow spacing
650 $aUrochloa ruziziensis
650 $aBiomassa
650 $aCapim Urochloa
650 $aMilho
650 $aSistema de Cultivo
653 $aIntegrated crop-livestock systems
700 1 $aSANTOS, A. C. dos
700 1 $aALMEIDA, R. E. M. de
700 1 $aARAUJO, R. P.
700 1 $aSILVA, E. H.
700 1 $aSOUSA, L. F.
700 1 $aSANTOS, J. G. D.
700 1 $aANDRÉ, T. B.
700 1 $aGOMES FILHO, P. H.
700 1 $aLINO, W. S.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Pesca e Aquicultura (CNPASA) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
URL |
Voltar
|
|
|
Registro Completo
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Soja. |
|
Data corrente: |
31/10/2008 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
17/01/2014 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
|
Circulação/Nível: |
Internacional - A |
|
Autoria: |
BUENO, A. de F.; BUENO, R. C. O. de F.; PARRA, J. R. P.; VIEIRA, S. S. |
|
Afiliação: |
ADENEY DE FREITAS BUENO, CNPSO; REGIANE CRISTINA OLIVEIRA DE FREITAS BUENO, ESALQ; JOSÉ ROBERTO POSTALI PARRA, ESALQ; SIMONE SILVA VIEIRA, CAV/UDESC. |
|
Título: |
Effects of pesticides used in soybean crops to the egg parasitoid Trichogramma pretiosum. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2008 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Ciência Rural, Santa Maria, v. 38, n. 6, p. 1495-1503, set. 2008. |
|
ISSN: |
0103-8478 |
|
DOI: |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0103-84782008000600001 |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
ABSTRACT: This research aimed to study the effects of different insecticides, herbicides and fungicides on eggs, larvae and pupae of Trichogramma pretiosum. The results showed that studied pesticides had different impact on T. pretiosum. Esfenvalerate 7.5 and spinosad 24.0 grams ha-1 were classified as harmfull (class 4) while clorfluazuron 10.0, methoxyfenozide 19.2, lactofen 165.0, fomesafen 250.0, fluazifop 125.0, glyphosate 960.0 (Gliz® and Roundup Transorb®), azoxistrobin + ciproconazol 60.0 + 24.0, azoxistrobin 50.0 and myclobutanil 125.0 grams ha-1 were chemicals classified as harmless to all imature T. pretiosum stages. All the other chemicals evaluated had different impact on T. pretiosum being classified from harmless (class 1) to harmful (class 4) varying the impact accordingly to the different parasitoid stage. Then, less noxious products should be chosen whenever possible to be used in a soybean IPM program. RESUMO: Este trabalho teve como objetivo estudar os efeitos de diferentes inseticidas, herbicidas e fungicidas em ovos, larvas e pupas de Trichogramma pretiosum. Os resultados mostraram que os pesticidas estudados tiveram efeitos diferentes sobre T. pretiosum. Esfenvalerato 7,5 e espinosade 24,0 gramas ha-1 foram classificados como nocivos (classe 4), enquanto que clorfluazurom 10,0, metoxifenozida 19,2, lactofem 165,0, fomesafem 250,0, fluazifope 125,0, glifosato 960,0 (Gliz® e Roundup Transorb®), azoxistrobina + ciproconazole 60,0 + 24,0, azoxistrobina 50,0 e miclobutanil 125,0 gramas ha-1 foram classificados como seletivos (classe 1) para todas as fases imaturas de T. pretiosum. Todos os demais agroquímicos avaliados tiveram diferentes efeitos em T. pretiosum, sendo classificados de seletivo (classe 1) a nocivo (classe 4), variando o impacto de acordo com as diferentes fases do parasitóide. Portanto, produtos menos nocivos aos inimigos naturais devem ser escolhidos, sempre que possível, para serem usados em um programa de MIP-soja. MenosABSTRACT: This research aimed to study the effects of different insecticides, herbicides and fungicides on eggs, larvae and pupae of Trichogramma pretiosum. The results showed that studied pesticides had different impact on T. pretiosum. Esfenvalerate 7.5 and spinosad 24.0 grams ha-1 were classified as harmfull (class 4) while clorfluazuron 10.0, methoxyfenozide 19.2, lactofen 165.0, fomesafen 250.0, fluazifop 125.0, glyphosate 960.0 (Gliz® and Roundup Transorb®), azoxistrobin + ciproconazol 60.0 + 24.0, azoxistrobin 50.0 and myclobutanil 125.0 grams ha-1 were chemicals classified as harmless to all imature T. pretiosum stages. All the other chemicals evaluated had different impact on T. pretiosum being classified from harmless (class 1) to harmful (class 4) varying the impact accordingly to the different parasitoid stage. Then, less noxious products should be chosen whenever possible to be used in a soybean IPM program. RESUMO: Este trabalho teve como objetivo estudar os efeitos de diferentes inseticidas, herbicidas e fungicidas em ovos, larvas e pupas de Trichogramma pretiosum. Os resultados mostraram que os pesticidas estudados tiveram efeitos diferentes sobre T. pretiosum. Esfenvalerato 7,5 e espinosade 24,0 gramas ha-1 foram classificados como nocivos (classe 4), enquanto que clorfluazurom 10,0, metoxifenozida 19,2, lactofem 165,0, fomesafem 250,0, fluazifope 125,0, glifosato 960,0 (Gliz® e Roundup Transorb®), azoxistrobina + ciproconazole 60,0 + 24,0, azoxistrobina 50,... Mostrar Tudo |
|
Thesagro: |
Controle Biológico; Controle Integrado; Controle Químico; Praga de Planta; Soja. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
-- |
|
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/item/95477/1/Effects-of-pesticides-used-in-soybean-crops-to-the-egg-parasitoid-Trichogramma-pretiosum.pdf
|
|
Marc: |
LEADER 02728naa a2200241 a 4500
001 1467497
005 2014-01-17
008 2008 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
022 $a0103-8478
024 7 $ahttp://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0103-84782008000600001$2DOI
100 1 $aBUENO, A. de F.
245 $aEffects of pesticides used in soybean crops to the egg parasitoid Trichogramma pretiosum.
260 $c2008
520 $aABSTRACT: This research aimed to study the effects of different insecticides, herbicides and fungicides on eggs, larvae and pupae of Trichogramma pretiosum. The results showed that studied pesticides had different impact on T. pretiosum. Esfenvalerate 7.5 and spinosad 24.0 grams ha-1 were classified as harmfull (class 4) while clorfluazuron 10.0, methoxyfenozide 19.2, lactofen 165.0, fomesafen 250.0, fluazifop 125.0, glyphosate 960.0 (Gliz® and Roundup Transorb®), azoxistrobin + ciproconazol 60.0 + 24.0, azoxistrobin 50.0 and myclobutanil 125.0 grams ha-1 were chemicals classified as harmless to all imature T. pretiosum stages. All the other chemicals evaluated had different impact on T. pretiosum being classified from harmless (class 1) to harmful (class 4) varying the impact accordingly to the different parasitoid stage. Then, less noxious products should be chosen whenever possible to be used in a soybean IPM program. RESUMO: Este trabalho teve como objetivo estudar os efeitos de diferentes inseticidas, herbicidas e fungicidas em ovos, larvas e pupas de Trichogramma pretiosum. Os resultados mostraram que os pesticidas estudados tiveram efeitos diferentes sobre T. pretiosum. Esfenvalerato 7,5 e espinosade 24,0 gramas ha-1 foram classificados como nocivos (classe 4), enquanto que clorfluazurom 10,0, metoxifenozida 19,2, lactofem 165,0, fomesafem 250,0, fluazifope 125,0, glifosato 960,0 (Gliz® e Roundup Transorb®), azoxistrobina + ciproconazole 60,0 + 24,0, azoxistrobina 50,0 e miclobutanil 125,0 gramas ha-1 foram classificados como seletivos (classe 1) para todas as fases imaturas de T. pretiosum. Todos os demais agroquímicos avaliados tiveram diferentes efeitos em T. pretiosum, sendo classificados de seletivo (classe 1) a nocivo (classe 4), variando o impacto de acordo com as diferentes fases do parasitóide. Portanto, produtos menos nocivos aos inimigos naturais devem ser escolhidos, sempre que possível, para serem usados em um programa de MIP-soja.
650 $aControle Biológico
650 $aControle Integrado
650 $aControle Químico
650 $aPraga de Planta
650 $aSoja
700 1 $aBUENO, R. C. O. de F.
700 1 $aPARRA, J. R. P.
700 1 $aVIEIRA, S. S.
773 $tCiência Rural, Santa Maria$gv. 38, n. 6, p. 1495-1503, set. 2008.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Soja (CNPSO) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
| Expressão de busca inválida. Verifique!!! |
|
|
