| |
|
|
 | Acesso ao texto completo restrito à biblioteca da Embrapa Agrossilvipastoril. Para informações adicionais entre em contato com cpamt.biblioteca@embrapa.br. |
|
Registro Completo |
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Agrossilvipastoril. |
|
Data corrente: |
29/01/2020 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
29/01/2020 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
|
Autoria: |
BRANCALION, P. H. S.; MELI, P.; TYMUS, J. R. C.; LENTI, F. E. B.; BENINI, R. M.; SILVA, A. P. M.; ISERNHAGEN, I.; HOLL, K. D. |
|
Afiliação: |
PEDRO H. S. BRANCALION, USP, ESALQ, Piracicaba; PAULA MELI, USP, ESALQ, Piracicaba; JULIO R. C. TYMUS, TNC, São Paulo; FELIPE E. B. LENTI, IPEA, Brasilia; RUBENS M. BENINI, TNC, São Paulo; ANA PAULA M. SILVA, IPEA, Brasilia; INGO ISERNHAGEN, CPAMT; KAREN D. HOLL, UNIVERSITY of CALIFORNIA, Santa Cruz, USA. |
|
Título: |
What makes ecosystem restoration expensive? A systematic cost assessment of projects in Brazil. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2019 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Biological Conservation, v. 240, 108274, 2019. |
|
ISSN: |
0006-3207 |
|
DOI: |
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2019.108274 |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
Limited funding is a major barrier to implementing ambitious global restoration commitments, so reducing restoration costs is essential to upscale restoration. The lack of rigorous analyses about the major components and drivers of restoration costs limit the development of alternatives to reduce costs and the selection of the most cost-effective methods to achieve restoration goals. We conducted detailed restoration cost assessments for the three most widespread biomes in Brazil (Amazon, Cerrado, and Atlantic Forest) and estimated the restoration costs associated with implementing Brazil?s National Plan for Native Vegetation Recovery (12M hectares). Most surveys (60?90%) reported using the costly methods of planting seedlings or sowing seeds throughout the site, regardless of the biome. Natural regeneration and assisted regeneration approaches were an order of magnitude cheaper but were reported in < 15% of projects. The vast majority of tree planting and direct seeding costs were incurred during the implementation phase, and nearly 80% of projects ended maintenance within 30 months. We estimated a price tag of US$0.7-1.2 billion per year until 2030 to implement Brazil?s restoration plan depending on the area that recovers through natural regeneration. Our results offer valuable insights for developing strategies to make restoration cheaper and to increase its cost-effectiveness for achieving diverse benefits in Brazilian ecosystems. Our survey also provides a starting point for sound assessments of restoration costs and their drivers in other biomes, which are needed to reduce the financial barriers to scaling up restoration at a global scale. MenosLimited funding is a major barrier to implementing ambitious global restoration commitments, so reducing restoration costs is essential to upscale restoration. The lack of rigorous analyses about the major components and drivers of restoration costs limit the development of alternatives to reduce costs and the selection of the most cost-effective methods to achieve restoration goals. We conducted detailed restoration cost assessments for the three most widespread biomes in Brazil (Amazon, Cerrado, and Atlantic Forest) and estimated the restoration costs associated with implementing Brazil?s National Plan for Native Vegetation Recovery (12M hectares). Most surveys (60?90%) reported using the costly methods of planting seedlings or sowing seeds throughout the site, regardless of the biome. Natural regeneration and assisted regeneration approaches were an order of magnitude cheaper but were reported in < 15% of projects. The vast majority of tree planting and direct seeding costs were incurred during the implementation phase, and nearly 80% of projects ended maintenance within 30 months. We estimated a price tag of US$0.7-1.2 billion per year until 2030 to implement Brazil?s restoration plan depending on the area that recovers through natural regeneration. Our results offer valuable insights for developing strategies to make restoration cheaper and to increase its cost-effectiveness for achieving diverse benefits in Brazilian ecosystems. Our survey also provides a starting poin... Mostrar Tudo |
|
Thesaurus Nal: |
Brazil; Ecosystems; Forest restoration. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
K Ciência Florestal e Produtos de Origem Vegetal |
|
Marc: |
LEADER 02457naa a2200265 a 4500
001 2119524
005 2020-01-29
008 2019 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
022 $a0006-3207
024 7 $ahttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2019.108274$2DOI
100 1 $aBRANCALION, P. H. S.
245 $aWhat makes ecosystem restoration expensive? A systematic cost assessment of projects in Brazil.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2019
520 $aLimited funding is a major barrier to implementing ambitious global restoration commitments, so reducing restoration costs is essential to upscale restoration. The lack of rigorous analyses about the major components and drivers of restoration costs limit the development of alternatives to reduce costs and the selection of the most cost-effective methods to achieve restoration goals. We conducted detailed restoration cost assessments for the three most widespread biomes in Brazil (Amazon, Cerrado, and Atlantic Forest) and estimated the restoration costs associated with implementing Brazil?s National Plan for Native Vegetation Recovery (12M hectares). Most surveys (60?90%) reported using the costly methods of planting seedlings or sowing seeds throughout the site, regardless of the biome. Natural regeneration and assisted regeneration approaches were an order of magnitude cheaper but were reported in < 15% of projects. The vast majority of tree planting and direct seeding costs were incurred during the implementation phase, and nearly 80% of projects ended maintenance within 30 months. We estimated a price tag of US$0.7-1.2 billion per year until 2030 to implement Brazil?s restoration plan depending on the area that recovers through natural regeneration. Our results offer valuable insights for developing strategies to make restoration cheaper and to increase its cost-effectiveness for achieving diverse benefits in Brazilian ecosystems. Our survey also provides a starting point for sound assessments of restoration costs and their drivers in other biomes, which are needed to reduce the financial barriers to scaling up restoration at a global scale.
650 $aBrazil
650 $aEcosystems
650 $aForest restoration
700 1 $aMELI, P.
700 1 $aTYMUS, J. R. C.
700 1 $aLENTI, F. E. B.
700 1 $aBENINI, R. M.
700 1 $aSILVA, A. P. M.
700 1 $aISERNHAGEN, I.
700 1 $aHOLL, K. D.
773 $tBiological Conservation$gv. 240, 108274, 2019.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Agrossilvipastoril (CPAMT) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
URL |
Voltar
|
|
|
Registro Completo
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Recursos Genéticos e Biotecnologia. |
|
Data corrente: |
21/01/2015 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
29/04/2024 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
|
Circulação/Nível: |
A - 1 |
|
Autoria: |
MYBURG, A. A.; GRATTAPAGLIA, D.; TUSKAN, G. A.; HELLSTEN, U.; HAYES, R. D.; GRIMWOOD, J.; JENKINS, J.; LINDQUIST, E.; BAUER, D.; GOODSTEIN, D. M.; DUBCHAK, I.; POLIAKOV, A.; MIZRACHI, E.; KULLAN, A. R. K.; HUSSEY, S. G.; PINARD, D.; MERWE, K. van der; SINGH, P.; JAARSVELD, I. van; SILVA JUNIOR, O. B.; TOGAWA, R. C.; PAPPAS, M. R.; FARIA, D. A.; SANSALONI, C. P.; PETROLI, C. D.; YANG, X.; RANJAN, P.; TSCHAPLINSKI, T. J.; YE, C.-Y.; LI, T.; STERCK, L.; VANNESTE, K.; MURAT, F.; SOLER, M.; SAN CLEMENTE, H.; SAIDI, N.; CASSAN-WANG, H.; DUNAND, C.; HEFER, C. A.; BORNBERG-BAUER, E.; KERSTING, A. R.; VINING, K.; AMARASINGHE, V.; RANIK, M.; NAITHANI, S.; ELSER, J.; BOYD, A. E.; LISTON, A.; SPATAFORA, J. W.; DHARMWARDHANA, P.; RAJA, R.; SULLIVAN, C.; ROMANEL, E.; ALVES-FERREIRA, M.; KULHEIM, C.; FOLEY, W.; CAROCHA, V.; PAIVA, J.; KUDRNA, D.; BROMMONSCHENKEL, S. H.; PASQUALI, G.; BYRNE, M.; RIGAULT, P.; SPOKEVICIUS, A.; JONES, R. C.; STEANE, D. A.; VAILLANCOURT, R. E.; POTTS, B. M.; JOUBERT, F.; BARRY, K.; PAPPAS JUNIOR, G. J.; STRAUSS, S. H.; JAISWAL, P.; GRIMA-PETTENATI, J.; SALSE, J.; PEER, Y. van de; ROKHSAR, D. S.; SCHMUTZ, J. |
|
Afiliação: |
ALEXANDER A. MYBURG, UNIVERSITY OF PRETORIA; DARIO GRATTAPAGLIA, CENARGEN; GERALD A. TUSKAN, DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY JOINT GENOME INSTITUTE; UFFE HELLSTEN, DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY JOINT GENOME INSTITUTE; RICHARD D. HAYES, DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY JOINT GENOME INSTITUTE; JANE GRIMWOOD, HUDSONALPHA INSTITUTE FOR BIOTECHNOLOGY; JERRY JENKINS, HUDSONALPHA INSTITUTE FOR BIOTECHNOLOGY; ERIKA LINDQUIST, US DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY JOINT GENOME INSTITUTE; DIANE BAUER, US DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY JOINT GENOME INSTITUTE; DAVID M. GOODSTEIN, US DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY JOINT GENOME INSTITUTE; INNA DUBCHAK, US DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY JOINT GENOME INSTITUTE; ALEXANDRE POLIAKOV, US DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY JOINT GENOME INSTITUTE; ESHCHAR MIZRACHI, UNIVERSITY OF PRETORIA; ANAND R. K. KULLAN, UNIVERSITY OF PRETORIA; STEVEN G. HUSSEY, UNIVERSITY OF PRETORIA; DESRE PINARD, UNIVERSITY OF PRETORIA; KAREN VAN DER MERWE, UNIVERSITY OF PRETORIA; POOJA SINGH, UNIVERSITY OF PRETORIA; IDA VAN JAARSVELD, UNIVERSITY OF PRETORIA; ORZENIL BONFIM DA SILVA JUNIOR, CENARGEN; ROBERTO COITI TOGAWA, CENARGEN; MARILIA DE CASTRO RODRIGUES PAPPAS, CENARGEN; DANIELLE A. FARIA; CAROLINA P. SANSALONI; CESAR D. PETROLI; XIAOHAN YANG, OAK RIDGE NATIONAL LABORATORY; PRIYA RANJAN, OAK RIDGE NATIONAL LABORATORY; TIMOTHY J. TSCHAPLINSKI, OAK RIDGE NATIONAL LABORATORY; CHU-YU YE, OAK RIDGE NATIONAL LABORATORY; TING LI, OAK RIDGE NATIONAL LABORATORY; LIEVEN STERCK, GHENT UNIVERSITY; KEVIN VANNESTE, GHENT UNIVERSITY; FLORENT MURAT, INRA/UBP UMR 1095; MARÇAL SOLER, UNIVERSITÉ TOULOUSE III; HELENE SAN CLEMENTE, UNIVERSITÉ TOULOUSE III; NAIJIB SAIDI, UNIVERSITÉ TOULOUSE III; HUA CASSAN-WANG, UNIVERSITÉ TOULOUSE III; CHRISTOPHE DUNAND, UNIVERSITÉ TOULOUSE III; CHARLES A. HEFER, UNIVERSITY OF PRETORIA; ERICH BORNBERG-BAUER, UNIVERSITY OF MUENSTER; ANNA R. KERSTING, UNIVERSITY OF MUENSTER; KELLY VINING, OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY; VINDHYA AMARASINGHE, OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY; MARTIN RANIK, OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY; SUSHMA NAITHANI, OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY; JUSTIN ELSER, OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY; ALEXANDER E. BOYD, OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY; AARON LISTON, OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY; JOSEPH W. SPATAFORA, OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY; PALITHA DHARMWARDHANA, OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY; RAJANI RAJA, OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY; CHRISTOPHER SULLIVAN, OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY; ELISSON ROMANEL, UFRJ; MARCIO ALVES-FERREIRA, UFRJ; CARSTEN KULHEIM, AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY; WILLIAM FOLEY, AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY; VICTOR CAROCHA, UNIVERSITÉ TOULOUSE III; JORGE PAIVA, IICT/MNE; DAVID KUDRNA, UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA; SERGIO H. BROMMONSCHENKEL, UFV; GIANCARLO PASQUALI, UFRGS; MARGARET BYRNE, WESTERN AUSTRALIA 6983; PHILIPPE RIGAULT, GYDLE, CANADA; ANTANAS SPOKEVICIUS, UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE; REBECCA C. JONES, UNIVERSITY OF TASMANIA; DOROTHY A. STEANE, UNIVERSITY OF TASMANIA; RENE E. VAILLANCOURT, UNIVERSITY OF TASMANIA; BRAD M. POTTS, UNIVERSITY OF TASMANIA; FOURIE JOUBERT, UNIVERSITY OF PRETORIA; KERRIE BARRY, US DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY JOINT GENOME INSTITUTE; GEORGIOS JOANNIS PAPPAS JUNIOR, CENARGEN; STEVEN H. STRAUSS, OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY; PANKAJ JAISWAL, OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY; JACQUELINE GRIMA-PETTENATI, UNIVERSITÉ TOULOUSE III; JEROME SALSE, INRA/UBP UMR 1095; YVES VAN DE PEER, GHENT UNIVERSITY; DANIEL S. ROKHSAR, US DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY JOINT GENOME INSTITUTE; JEREMY SCHMUTZ, US DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY JOINT GENOME INSTITUTE. |
|
Título: |
The genome of Eucalyptus grandis. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2014 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Nature (London), v. 510, p. 356-362, 2014. |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Genome evolution; Phylogenomics; Secondary metabolism. |
|
Thesagro: |
Eucalyptus Grandis. |
|
Thesaurus NAL: |
biofuels. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
-- |
|
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/item/116064/1/nature13308.pdf
|
|
Marc: |
LEADER 02745naa a2201093 a 4500
001 2006198
005 2024-04-29
008 2014 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
100 1 $aMYBURG, A. A.
245 $aThe genome of Eucalyptus grandis.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2014
650 $abiofuels
650 $aEucalyptus Grandis
653 $aGenome evolution
653 $aPhylogenomics
653 $aSecondary metabolism
700 1 $aGRATTAPAGLIA, D.
700 1 $aTUSKAN, G. A.
700 1 $aHELLSTEN, U.
700 1 $aHAYES, R. D.
700 1 $aGRIMWOOD, J.
700 1 $aJENKINS, J.
700 1 $aLINDQUIST, E.
700 1 $aBAUER, D.
700 1 $aGOODSTEIN, D. M.
700 1 $aDUBCHAK, I.
700 1 $aPOLIAKOV, A.
700 1 $aMIZRACHI, E.
700 1 $aKULLAN, A. R. K.
700 1 $aHUSSEY, S. G.
700 1 $aPINARD, D.
700 1 $aMERWE, K. van der
700 1 $aSINGH, P.
700 1 $aJAARSVELD, I. van
700 1 $aSILVA JUNIOR, O. B.
700 1 $aTOGAWA, R. C.
700 1 $aPAPPAS, M. R.
700 1 $aFARIA, D. A.
700 1 $aSANSALONI, C. P.
700 1 $aPETROLI, C. D.
700 1 $aYANG, X.
700 1 $aRANJAN, P.
700 1 $aTSCHAPLINSKI, T. J.
700 1 $aYE, C.-Y.
700 1 $aLI, T.
700 1 $aSTERCK, L.
700 1 $aVANNESTE, K.
700 1 $aMURAT, F.
700 1 $aSOLER, M.
700 1 $aSAN CLEMENTE, H.
700 1 $aSAIDI, N.
700 1 $aCASSAN-WANG, H.
700 1 $aDUNAND, C.
700 1 $aHEFER, C. A.
700 1 $aBORNBERG-BAUER, E.
700 1 $aKERSTING, A. R.
700 1 $aVINING, K.
700 1 $aAMARASINGHE, V.
700 1 $aRANIK, M.
700 1 $aNAITHANI, S.
700 1 $aELSER, J.
700 1 $aBOYD, A. E.
700 1 $aLISTON, A.
700 1 $aSPATAFORA, J. W.
700 1 $aDHARMWARDHANA, P.
700 1 $aRAJA, R.
700 1 $aSULLIVAN, C.
700 1 $aROMANEL, E.
700 1 $aALVES-FERREIRA, M.
700 1 $aKULHEIM, C.
700 1 $aFOLEY, W.
700 1 $aCAROCHA, V.
700 1 $aPAIVA, J.
700 1 $aKUDRNA, D.
700 1 $aBROMMONSCHENKEL, S. H.
700 1 $aPASQUALI, G.
700 1 $aBYRNE, M.
700 1 $aRIGAULT, P.
700 1 $aSPOKEVICIUS, A.
700 1 $aJONES, R. C.
700 1 $aSTEANE, D. A.
700 1 $aVAILLANCOURT, R. E.
700 1 $aPOTTS, B. M.
700 1 $aJOUBERT, F.
700 1 $aBARRY, K.
700 1 $aPAPPAS JUNIOR, G. J.
700 1 $aSTRAUSS, S. H.
700 1 $aJAISWAL, P.
700 1 $aGRIMA-PETTENATI, J.
700 1 $aSALSE, J.
700 1 $aPEER, Y. van de
700 1 $aROKHSAR, D. S.
700 1 $aSCHMUTZ, J.
773 $tNature (London)$gv. 510, p. 356-362, 2014.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Recursos Genéticos e Biotecnologia (CENARGEN) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
| Expressão de busca inválida. Verifique!!! |
|
|
