| |
|
|
| Registros recuperados : 26 | |
| 3. |  | OLIVEIRA, M.; MATTOS, P. P. de; BRAZ, E. M.; CANETTI, A.; BASSO, R.; ROSOT, N. Growth pattern of Qualea albiflora and Goupia glabra in Amazon forest, Mato Grosso State, Brazil. The International Forestry Review, v. 16, n. 5, p. 139, 2014. Edição dos abstracts do 24º IUFRO World Congress, 2014, Salt Lake City. Sustaining forests, sustaining people: the role of research.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Florestas. |
|    |
| 6. | | BRAZ, E. M.; CANETTI, A.; MATTOS, P. P. de; BASSO, R. O. Aplicando os dados de parcelas permanentes no manejo florestal. In: CONGRESSO FLORESTAL DE MATO GROSSO, 1.; SIMPÓSIO DE PÓS-GRADUAÇÃO EM CIÊNCIAS AMBIENTAIS E FLORESTAIS, 5.; SEMANA ACADÊMICA DE ENGENHARIA FLORESTAL - UFMT/Sinop, 5., 2015, Sinop. Anais. Sinop: UFMT, 2015. 1 p. Disponível online. Resumo. Seção: Manejo florestal.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Florestas. |
| |
| 16. | | BRAZ, E. M.; BASSO, R.; ABREU, M.; MATTOS, P. P. de; OLIVERIA, M.; ZACHOW, R. Potential of natural forest production in Sinop County in the Amazonia region, Brazil. The International Forestry Review, v. 16, n. 5, p. 139, 2014. Edição dos abstracts do 24º IUFRO World Congress, 2014, Salt Lake City. Sustaining forests, sustaining people: the role of research.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Florestas. |
| |
| 17. | | GARRASTAZU, M. C.; MATTOS, P. P. de; CANETTI, A.; BRAZ, E. M.; BASSO, R. O. Relação entre potencial de ocorrência ambiental e abundância de espécies florestais no Mato Grosso. In: CONGRESSO FLORESTAL DE MATO GROSSO, 1.; SIMPÓSIO DE PÓS-GRADUAÇÃO EM CIÊNCIAS AMBIENTAIS E FLORESTAIS, 5.; SEMANA ACADÊMICA DE ENGENHARIA FLORESTAL - UFMT/Sinop, 5., 2015, Sinop. Anais. Sinop: UFMT, 2015. 1 p. Disponível online. Resumo. Seção: Manejo florestal.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Florestas. |
| |
| 20. | | BRAZ, E. M.; BASSO, R. O.; CURTO, R. De A.; MATTOS, P. P. de; SILVA, J. P. Densidade ótima de estradas para a exploração em plano de manejo florestal. In: SEMINÁRIO DE COLHEITA E TRANSPORTE DE MADEIRA, 18., 2018, Ribeirão Preto. Anais. Brasília, DF: Embrapa; Colombo: Embrapa Florestas, 2018. p. 45-49.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Florestas. |
| |
| Registros recuperados : 26 | |
|
|
|
Registro Completo
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Clima Temperado. |
|
Data corrente: |
15/03/2022 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
15/03/2022 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
|
Circulação/Nível: |
A - 4 |
|
Autoria: |
DORNELES, A. O. S.; PEREIRA, A. S.; SILVA, T. B. da; TANIGUCHI, M.; BORTOLIN, G. S.; CASTRO, C. M.; PEREIRA, A. da S.; REISSER JUNIOR, C.; AMARANTE, L. do; HAERTER, J. A.; DUTRA, L. F. |
|
Afiliação: |
ATHOS ODIN SEVERO DORNELES; ALINE SOARES PEREIRA; TALIS BASILIO DA SILVA; MARISA TANIGUCHI; GABRIEL STRECK BORTOLIN; CAROLINE MARQUES CASTRO, CPACT; ARIONE DA SILVA PEREIRA, CPACT; CARLOS REISSER JUNIOR, CPACT; LUCIANO DO AMARANTE; JANNI ANDRE HAERTER, CPACT; LEONARDO FERREIRA DUTRA, CPACT. |
|
Título: |
Responses of Solanum tuberosum L. to Water Deficit by Matric or Osmotic Induction. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2021 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Potato Research, v. 64, p. 515-534, 2021. |
|
DOI: |
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11540-020-09489-3 |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
Toselectpotatogenotypestoleranttowaterdeficit,systemstosimulatethisstresshavebeen used. Polyethylene glycol (PEG) is the main osmotic agent used for this purpose, but it causes an excessively severe stress. However, it is difficult to carry out an experiment that aims to compare plant responses under water deficit by osmotic or matric induction, and, thus,fewstudiescomparethesestress-inducingmechanisms.Therefore,theobjectiveofthis studywas to compare the responses of Agata, BRS Clara,C2406-03andCota genotypes to water deficit in both induction methods (matric or osmotic). The tests were carried out in a greenhouse, one using hydroponics (osmotic induction) and the other in pots with soil (matric induction). In both tests, the application of stressful conditions occurred at the beginning of tuberization. Assessments of gas exchange and shoot temperature were made throughout the exposure to stress. Also, samples were collected from leaves for analysis of osmotic potential and leaves and tubers for analysis of metabolite content. At the end of the potatoplantcycle,thenumberandweightoftuberswereevaluated.Inbothstressconditions, there were significant reductions in photosynthesis and transpiration rate compared to the respective normal hydration conditions. In addition, indicators such as metabolite levels (proline and soluble sugars) were significantly altered in plants exposed to different stress inductions. These data, together with the significant limitations in the growth of stressed plants, indicate that the experimental models induce similar responses. However, the water deficit by osmotic induction was more severe for the potato plants when compared to stress due to matric induction, mainly affecting tuber production. Therefore, the water deficit osmotic induction model can be recommended for phenotyping tolerance to this stress, due to the hydroponic system inducing greater tuber production per plant under optimal cultivation conditions. MenosToselectpotatogenotypestoleranttowaterdeficit,systemstosimulatethisstresshavebeen used. Polyethylene glycol (PEG) is the main osmotic agent used for this purpose, but it causes an excessively severe stress. However, it is difficult to carry out an experiment that aims to compare plant responses under water deficit by osmotic or matric induction, and, thus,fewstudiescomparethesestress-inducingmechanisms.Therefore,theobjectiveofthis studywas to compare the responses of Agata, BRS Clara,C2406-03andCota genotypes to water deficit in both induction methods (matric or osmotic). The tests were carried out in a greenhouse, one using hydroponics (osmotic induction) and the other in pots with soil (matric induction). In both tests, the application of stressful conditions occurred at the beginning of tuberization. Assessments of gas exchange and shoot temperature were made throughout the exposure to stress. Also, samples were collected from leaves for analysis of osmotic potential and leaves and tubers for analysis of metabolite content. At the end of the potatoplantcycle,thenumberandweightoftuberswereevaluated.Inbothstressconditions, there were significant reductions in photosynthesis and transpiration rate compared to the respective normal hydration conditions. In addition, indicators such as metabolite levels (proline and soluble sugars) were significantly altered in plants exposed to different stress inductions. These data, together with the significant limitations in the growth of... Mostrar Tudo |
|
Thesagro: |
Batata; Genótipo; Recurso Hídrico; Stress. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
-- |
|
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/item/232554/1/Artigo-Responses-of-Solanum.pdf
|
|
Marc: |
LEADER 02835naa a2200301 a 4500
001 2140920
005 2022-03-15
008 2021 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
024 7 $ahttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11540-020-09489-3$2DOI
100 1 $aDORNELES, A. O. S.
245 $aResponses of Solanum tuberosum L. to Water Deficit by Matric or Osmotic Induction.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2021
520 $aToselectpotatogenotypestoleranttowaterdeficit,systemstosimulatethisstresshavebeen used. Polyethylene glycol (PEG) is the main osmotic agent used for this purpose, but it causes an excessively severe stress. However, it is difficult to carry out an experiment that aims to compare plant responses under water deficit by osmotic or matric induction, and, thus,fewstudiescomparethesestress-inducingmechanisms.Therefore,theobjectiveofthis studywas to compare the responses of Agata, BRS Clara,C2406-03andCota genotypes to water deficit in both induction methods (matric or osmotic). The tests were carried out in a greenhouse, one using hydroponics (osmotic induction) and the other in pots with soil (matric induction). In both tests, the application of stressful conditions occurred at the beginning of tuberization. Assessments of gas exchange and shoot temperature were made throughout the exposure to stress. Also, samples were collected from leaves for analysis of osmotic potential and leaves and tubers for analysis of metabolite content. At the end of the potatoplantcycle,thenumberandweightoftuberswereevaluated.Inbothstressconditions, there were significant reductions in photosynthesis and transpiration rate compared to the respective normal hydration conditions. In addition, indicators such as metabolite levels (proline and soluble sugars) were significantly altered in plants exposed to different stress inductions. These data, together with the significant limitations in the growth of stressed plants, indicate that the experimental models induce similar responses. However, the water deficit by osmotic induction was more severe for the potato plants when compared to stress due to matric induction, mainly affecting tuber production. Therefore, the water deficit osmotic induction model can be recommended for phenotyping tolerance to this stress, due to the hydroponic system inducing greater tuber production per plant under optimal cultivation conditions.
650 $aBatata
650 $aGenótipo
650 $aRecurso Hídrico
650 $aStress
700 1 $aPEREIRA, A. S.
700 1 $aSILVA, T. B. da
700 1 $aTANIGUCHI, M.
700 1 $aBORTOLIN, G. S.
700 1 $aCASTRO, C. M.
700 1 $aPEREIRA, A. da S.
700 1 $aREISSER JUNIOR, C.
700 1 $aAMARANTE, L. do
700 1 $aHAERTER, J. A.
700 1 $aDUTRA, L. F.
773 $tPotato Research$gv. 64, p. 515-534, 2021.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Clima Temperado (CPACT) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
| Expressão de busca inválida. Verifique!!! |
|
|
