|
|
| Acesso ao texto completo restrito à biblioteca da Embrapa Gado de Corte. Para informações adicionais entre em contato com cnpgc.biblioteca@embrapa.br. |
Registro Completo |
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Gado de Corte. |
Data corrente: |
26/12/2022 |
Data da última atualização: |
27/12/2022 |
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
Autoria: |
BARSOTTI, M. P.; ALMEIDA, R. G. de; MACEDO, M. C. M.; LAURA, V. A.; ALVES, F. V.; WERNER, J.; DICKHOEFER, U. |
Afiliação: |
MARIANA PEREIRA BARSOTTI, UNIVERSITY OF HOHENHEIM; ROBERTO GIOLO DE ALMEIDA, CNPGC; MANUEL CLAUDIO MOTTA MACEDO, CNPGC; VALDEMIR ANTONIO LAURA, CNPGC; FABIANA VILLA ALVES, CNPGC - MINISTÉRIO DA AGRICULTURA, PECUÁRIA E ABASTECIMENTO; JESSICA WERNER, UNIVERSITY OF HOHENHEIM; UTA DICKHOEFER, UNIVERSITY OF HOHENHEIM. |
Título: |
Assessing the freshwater fluxes related to beef cattle production: a comparison of integrated crop-livestock systems and a conventional grazing system. |
Ano de publicação: |
2022 |
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Agricultural Water Management, v. 269, e107665, p. 1-14, 2022. |
ISSN: |
0378-3774 |
DOI: |
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2022.107665 |
Idioma: |
Inglês |
Conteúdo: |
Beef production is one of the largest water consumers of all food production systems, but there are substantial knowledge gaps about the accounting and interpretation of its freshwater consumption. Moreover, hardly any study has assessed the freshwater fluxes related to beef cattle in integrated crop-livestock (ICL) and crop-livestock-forestry (ICLF) systems. We aimed at quantifying the freshwater fluxes related to beef cattle raised on continuous permanent Brachiaria pastures (CON) or in ICL and ICLF systems in the Brazilian Cerrado in the rainy and dry seasons. Evapotranspiration of forage grass, Eucalyptus trees in ICLF, and from drinking water troughs were calculated from meteorological data collected in the field. Forage accumulation was measured in 11 paddocks over both seasons, and forage intake, drinking water intake, and bodyweight were quantified in 12 growing Nellore heifers per system during two months per season. Freshwater fluxes related to forage production and animals were estimated. Drinking water intake and water intake via forage did not differ (P > 0.073) between the systems, and were greater (P < 0.035) in the rainy than the dry season. Faecal and urinary water excretions were greater in the dry than the rainy season (P < 0.005). The respiratory and cutaneous water losses were greater (P < 0.001) in the rainy than the dry season. In the rainy season, evapotranspiration related to forage accumulation and freshwater consumption for raising beef cattle were greatest in CON, whereas they were greatest in ICLF in the dry season. Although ICLF appeared to be less resilient to dry periods, both integrated systems offer the potential for reduced freshwater consumption for raising beef cattle under grazing conditions, by improving the efficiency of forage use and/or decreasing evapotranspiration of forage. MenosBeef production is one of the largest water consumers of all food production systems, but there are substantial knowledge gaps about the accounting and interpretation of its freshwater consumption. Moreover, hardly any study has assessed the freshwater fluxes related to beef cattle in integrated crop-livestock (ICL) and crop-livestock-forestry (ICLF) systems. We aimed at quantifying the freshwater fluxes related to beef cattle raised on continuous permanent Brachiaria pastures (CON) or in ICL and ICLF systems in the Brazilian Cerrado in the rainy and dry seasons. Evapotranspiration of forage grass, Eucalyptus trees in ICLF, and from drinking water troughs were calculated from meteorological data collected in the field. Forage accumulation was measured in 11 paddocks over both seasons, and forage intake, drinking water intake, and bodyweight were quantified in 12 growing Nellore heifers per system during two months per season. Freshwater fluxes related to forage production and animals were estimated. Drinking water intake and water intake via forage did not differ (P > 0.073) between the systems, and were greater (P < 0.035) in the rainy than the dry season. Faecal and urinary water excretions were greater in the dry than the rainy season (P < 0.005). The respiratory and cutaneous water losses were greater (P < 0.001) in the rainy than the dry season. In the rainy season, evapotranspiration related to forage accumulation and freshwater consumption for raising beef cattle were... Mostrar Tudo |
Thesagro: |
Gado de Corte; Ruminante; Sistema de Cultivo. |
Thesaurus Nal: |
Agroforestry; Beef cattle; Farming systems; Ruminants; Silvopastoral systems; Tropical pastures. |
Categoria do assunto: |
-- |
Marc: |
LEADER 02871naa a2200325 a 4500 001 2150327 005 2022-12-27 008 2022 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d 022 $a0378-3774 024 7 $ahttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2022.107665$2DOI 100 1 $aBARSOTTI, M. P. 245 $aAssessing the freshwater fluxes related to beef cattle production$ba comparison of integrated crop-livestock systems and a conventional grazing system.$h[electronic resource] 260 $c2022 520 $aBeef production is one of the largest water consumers of all food production systems, but there are substantial knowledge gaps about the accounting and interpretation of its freshwater consumption. Moreover, hardly any study has assessed the freshwater fluxes related to beef cattle in integrated crop-livestock (ICL) and crop-livestock-forestry (ICLF) systems. We aimed at quantifying the freshwater fluxes related to beef cattle raised on continuous permanent Brachiaria pastures (CON) or in ICL and ICLF systems in the Brazilian Cerrado in the rainy and dry seasons. Evapotranspiration of forage grass, Eucalyptus trees in ICLF, and from drinking water troughs were calculated from meteorological data collected in the field. Forage accumulation was measured in 11 paddocks over both seasons, and forage intake, drinking water intake, and bodyweight were quantified in 12 growing Nellore heifers per system during two months per season. Freshwater fluxes related to forage production and animals were estimated. Drinking water intake and water intake via forage did not differ (P > 0.073) between the systems, and were greater (P < 0.035) in the rainy than the dry season. Faecal and urinary water excretions were greater in the dry than the rainy season (P < 0.005). The respiratory and cutaneous water losses were greater (P < 0.001) in the rainy than the dry season. In the rainy season, evapotranspiration related to forage accumulation and freshwater consumption for raising beef cattle were greatest in CON, whereas they were greatest in ICLF in the dry season. Although ICLF appeared to be less resilient to dry periods, both integrated systems offer the potential for reduced freshwater consumption for raising beef cattle under grazing conditions, by improving the efficiency of forage use and/or decreasing evapotranspiration of forage. 650 $aAgroforestry 650 $aBeef cattle 650 $aFarming systems 650 $aRuminants 650 $aSilvopastoral systems 650 $aTropical pastures 650 $aGado de Corte 650 $aRuminante 650 $aSistema de Cultivo 700 1 $aALMEIDA, R. G. de 700 1 $aMACEDO, M. C. M. 700 1 $aLAURA, V. A. 700 1 $aALVES, F. V. 700 1 $aWERNER, J. 700 1 $aDICKHOEFER, U. 773 $tAgricultural Water Management$gv. 269, e107665, p. 1-14, 2022.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
Registro original: |
Embrapa Gado de Corte (CNPGC) |
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
URL |
Voltar
|
|
Registros recuperados : 1 | |
1. | | BARSOTTI, M. P.; ALMEIDA, R. G. de; MACEDO, M. C. M.; LAURA, V. A.; ALVES, F. V.; WERNER, J.; DICKHOEFER, U. Assessing the freshwater fluxes related to beef cattle production: a comparison of integrated crop-livestock systems and a conventional grazing system. Agricultural Water Management, v. 269, e107665, p. 1-14, 2022.Tipo: Artigo em Periódico Indexado | Circulação/Nível: A - 1 |
Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Gado de Corte. |
| |
Registros recuperados : 1 | |
|
Nenhum registro encontrado para a expressão de busca informada. |
|
|