Data/hora: 24/06/2024 16:09:11

Biblioteca(s): 	Embrapa Amazônia Oriental.	
Data corrente: 	19/05/2020	
Data da última atualização: 	19/05/2020	
Autoria: 	MARTINS, W. B. R.; LIMA, M. D. R.; BARROS JUNIOR, U. O.; AMORIM, L. S. V.-B.; OLIVEIRA, F. de A.; SCHWARTZ, G.	
Afiliação: 	Walmer Bruno Rocha Martins, UFRA; Michael Douglas Roque Lima, UFRA; Udsonde Oliveira Barros Junior, UFRA; Larissa Sousa Villas-Boas Amorim, Management and Operational Center of the Amazonia Protection System; Francisco de Assis Oliveira, UFRA; GUSTAVO SCHWARTZ, CPATU.	
Título: 	Ecological methods and indicators for recovering and monitoring ecosystems after mining: A global literature review.	
Ano de publicação: 	2020	
Fonte/Imprenta: 	Ecological Engineering, v. 145, 105707, Feb. 2020.	
Idioma: 	Inglês	
Conteúdo: 	Mining contributes significantly to the world's economy. However, it brings strong environmental impacts, including the destruction of the original vegetation. In this way, the recovery of degraded areas by mining has been a mandatory procedure in many countries. With the objective to review this subject, a bibliometric analysis was carried out using scientific articles published in the period 1990?2018. A total of 700 articles in 171 journals were sampled. Ecological Engineering and Restoration Ecology were the journals with the largest number of articles. There was a significant increase of articles along time approaching the use of geotechnologies and arbuscular fungi. Recovered or recovering ecosystems were studied in 45 countries, mainly in Brazil, Australia, USA, China, and Spain. Coal and bauxite were the most common resources mined. The most frequent recovery methods were: seedling planting, direct seeding, natural regeneration, and hydroseeding, with techniques employed in some of them. In 35.71% of the articles, a small number of species (2?5) were used for the initial plant's establishment. The number of articles decreased as the number of both, plant species used in the initial recovery phase, and ecosystem's age increased. In monitoring, the most important indicators were classified as functional or functional plus structural. From the functional indicators, the Technosols or rebuilt soils were the most evaluated. Future perspectives on forests recovery includes methods tailored to peculiar features (soil and economic) of each ecosystem. For the forest recovery monitoring, the use of geotechnologies, mainly the Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), as well as wildlife indicators tend to increase rapidly.	
Palavras-Chave: 	Análise bibliométrica; Área degradada; Indicador ecológico; Restauração ambiental.	
Categoria do assunto: 	K Ciência Florestal e Produtos de Origem Vegetal	
URL: 	http://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/item/213077/1/EcologicalEngineering.pdf	
Registro original: 	Embrapa Amazônia Oriental (CPATU)	
Exemplares: 	CPATU - (56366-1) - UPC - AP - DD -  -  -  - DIS