| |
|
|
|
Registro Completo |
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Florestas. |
|
Data corrente: |
16/09/2008 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
16/09/2008 |
|
Autoria: |
BADEJO, M. A. |
|
Título: |
Challenges in taxonomic studies of oribatid mites in Nigeria and Brazil. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2008 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
In: INTERNATIONAL COLLOQUIUM ON SOIL ZOOLOGY, 15; INTERNATIONAL COLLOQUIUM ON APTERYGOTA, 12., 2008, Curitiba. Biodiversity, conservation and sustainabele management of soil animal: abstracts. Colombo: Embrapa Florestas. Editors: George Gardner Brown; Klaus Dieter Sautter; Renato Marques; Amarildo Pasini. 1 CD-ROM. |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
Hitherto, taxonomic studies of oribatid mites in Nigeria have been restricted to identification not
beyond the generic level with keys developed from oribatid mite studies elsewhere. At the turn
of this millennium, these studies were advanced further with the description of 16 species of
oribatid mites from Nigeria. Simultaneously, 7 species were also described from Brazil, one of
which is a re-description of Archegozetes magnus which was first described from Sumatra in
1925. Many more species remain undescribed due to dwindling expertise in oribatid studies in
Nigeria in particular, a consequence of several factors among which are: inadequate facilities
for advanced taxonomic work and lack of access to previous reports of taxonomic work on
Oribatida which can only be found in very few museums in Europe and America. While describing
these species, errors in classification and description of oribatid mites in literature were identified.
One of such errors led to the suggestion that several taxonomic groups should be sunk in synonymy.
One of such is a Xylobatid genus, Brasilobates which was seen as a synonym of Protoribates
due to lack of traits of phylogenetic value that could be used to justify a separate generic status
for Brasilobates. Such errors arose due to lack of communication between different workers in
different parts of the world. In addition, many poorly described species were seen in old literature
and it was suggested that there should be a re-examination and re-description of many type
specimens as well as complete revision of taxa so as to expand definitions and arrest the current
trend of proliferation of families and genera. The task of designing identification keys for local
oribatid mite species remains the greatest academic challenge facing oribatodologists in Nigeria
and Brazil today. It is however acknowledged that with the description of those new species, the
stage has been set not only for advanced ecological research on them in the Ethiopian and
Neotropical regions, but also for laboratory experiments on their biology, physiology and
ecotoxicology. This is potentially capable of bridging the gap in knowledge that currently exists
in respect of such research findings between the northern and southern hemispheres MenosHitherto, taxonomic studies of oribatid mites in Nigeria have been restricted to identification not
beyond the generic level with keys developed from oribatid mite studies elsewhere. At the turn
of this millennium, these studies were advanced further with the description of 16 species of
oribatid mites from Nigeria. Simultaneously, 7 species were also described from Brazil, one of
which is a re-description of Archegozetes magnus which was first described from Sumatra in
1925. Many more species remain undescribed due to dwindling expertise in oribatid studies in
Nigeria in particular, a consequence of several factors among which are: inadequate facilities
for advanced taxonomic work and lack of access to previous reports of taxonomic work on
Oribatida which can only be found in very few museums in Europe and America. While describing
these species, errors in classification and description of oribatid mites in literature were identified.
One of such errors led to the suggestion that several taxonomic groups should be sunk in synonymy.
One of such is a Xylobatid genus, Brasilobates which was seen as a synonym of Protoribates
due to lack of traits of phylogenetic value that could be used to justify a separate generic status
for Brasilobates. Such errors arose due to lack of communication between different workers in
different parts of the world. In addition, many poorly described species were seen in old literature
and it was suggested that there should be a re-examination and r... Mostrar Tudo |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
-- |
|
Marc: |
LEADER 02889naa a2200121 a 4500
001 1314833
005 2008-09-16
008 2008 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
100 1 $aBADEJO, M. A.
245 $aChallenges in taxonomic studies of oribatid mites in Nigeria and Brazil.
260 $c2008
520 $aHitherto, taxonomic studies of oribatid mites in Nigeria have been restricted to identification not beyond the generic level with keys developed from oribatid mite studies elsewhere. At the turn of this millennium, these studies were advanced further with the description of 16 species of oribatid mites from Nigeria. Simultaneously, 7 species were also described from Brazil, one of which is a re-description of Archegozetes magnus which was first described from Sumatra in 1925. Many more species remain undescribed due to dwindling expertise in oribatid studies in Nigeria in particular, a consequence of several factors among which are: inadequate facilities for advanced taxonomic work and lack of access to previous reports of taxonomic work on Oribatida which can only be found in very few museums in Europe and America. While describing these species, errors in classification and description of oribatid mites in literature were identified. One of such errors led to the suggestion that several taxonomic groups should be sunk in synonymy. One of such is a Xylobatid genus, Brasilobates which was seen as a synonym of Protoribates due to lack of traits of phylogenetic value that could be used to justify a separate generic status for Brasilobates. Such errors arose due to lack of communication between different workers in different parts of the world. In addition, many poorly described species were seen in old literature and it was suggested that there should be a re-examination and re-description of many type specimens as well as complete revision of taxa so as to expand definitions and arrest the current trend of proliferation of families and genera. The task of designing identification keys for local oribatid mite species remains the greatest academic challenge facing oribatodologists in Nigeria and Brazil today. It is however acknowledged that with the description of those new species, the stage has been set not only for advanced ecological research on them in the Ethiopian and Neotropical regions, but also for laboratory experiments on their biology, physiology and ecotoxicology. This is potentially capable of bridging the gap in knowledge that currently exists in respect of such research findings between the northern and southern hemispheres
773 $tIn: INTERNATIONAL COLLOQUIUM ON SOIL ZOOLOGY, 15; INTERNATIONAL COLLOQUIUM ON APTERYGOTA, 12., 2008, Curitiba. Biodiversity, conservation and sustainabele management of soil animal: abstracts. Colombo: Embrapa Florestas. Editors: George Gardner Brown; Klaus Dieter Sautter; Renato Marques; Amarildo Pasini. 1 CD-ROM.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Florestas (CNPF) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
URL |
Voltar
|
|
|
 | Acesso ao texto completo restrito à biblioteca da Embrapa Florestas. Para informações adicionais entre em contato com cnpf.biblioteca@embrapa.br. |
Registro Completo
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Florestas. |
|
Data corrente: |
10/07/2000 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
10/03/2017 |
|
Autoria: |
GALVÃO, A. P. M. (org.). |
|
Afiliação: |
Pesquisador da Embrapa Florestas. |
|
Título: |
Reflorestamento de propriedades rurais para fins produtivos e ambientais: um guia para ações municipais e regionais. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2000 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Brasília, DF: Embrapa Comunicação para Transferência de Tecnologia; Colombo: Embrapa Florestas, 2000. |
|
Páginas: |
351 p. |
|
ISBN: |
85-7383-081-6 |
|
Idioma: |
Português |
|
Conteúdo: |
Informacoes tecnicas sobre reflorestamento em pequenas e medias propriedades rurais para fins produtivos e ambientais. Essas informacoes possibilitam a escolha correta das especies para diferentes usos e regioes do Pais. Ensina como fazer o plantio e o manejo do reflorestamento, indicando as praticas silviculturais que levam a uma boa comercializacao da madeira produtiva: producao de sementes florestais melhoradas, superacao de dormencia e armazenamento de sementes de especies para reflorestamento, producao de mudas de especies florestais. producao de mudas de especies nativas por sementes e a implantacao de povoamentos, propagacao vegetativa de especies florestais, materiais e procedimentos para producao de mudas por estaquia, implantacao de povoamentos florestais com especies de rapido crescimento, manejo e silvicultura de plantacoes de pinus em pequena propriedade rural, manejo de reforestamento de pinus com uso de computador, tecnicas de recuperacao e manejo de areas degradadas, sistemas agroflorestais: aspectos basicos e indicacoes. Concomitantemente, descreve os inumeros beneficios ambientais dos plantios florestais para o proprietario rural e para toda a sociedade. |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Agrofloresta; Aspecto economico; Brasil; Degradacao; Economic situation; Especie florestal; Especies florestal; Floresta - Brasil; florestal; florestas; Florests; Floreta; Forest; Forest seedling; Forest species; Forestation; Forestry specie; Madeira de reflorestamento; Management; Planting stock; ProducÆo; Producao: Reforestation; Production; Production forests; Produtor rural; Propagação; Propagation; Reclamation; Recuperacao; Recuperation; Reflorestation; Rural farms; Rural properties; Seedling; Sistema agroflorestal; Species; Tecnica; USe; Uses; Uso. |
|
Thesagro: |
Agricultura; Armazenamento; Deterioração do Solo; Espécie; Essência Florestal; Floresta; Madeira; Manejo; Meio Ambiente; Muda; Planta; Produção; Propagação Vegetativa; Propriedade Rural; Proteção Ambiental; Recuperação do Solo; Reflorestamento; Semente; Silvicultura; Variedade. |
|
Thesaurus NAL: |
agroforestry; Brazil; degradation; environmental degradation; environmental protection; farms; forest trees; forestry; forests; reforestation; rural areas; seed storage; seedlings; technology; wood. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
--
A Sistemas de Cultivo
K Ciência Florestal e Produtos de Origem Vegetal |
|
Marc: |
LEADER 03851nam a2201033 a 4500
001 1297392
005 2017-03-10
008 2000 bl uuuu 00u1 u #d
020 $a85-7383-081-6
100 1 $aGALVÃO, A. P. M.
245 $aReflorestamento de propriedades rurais para fins produtivos e ambientais$bum guia para ações municipais e regionais.
260 $aBrasília, DF: Embrapa Comunicação para Transferência de Tecnologia; Colombo: Embrapa Florestas$c2000
300 $a351 p.
520 $aInformacoes tecnicas sobre reflorestamento em pequenas e medias propriedades rurais para fins produtivos e ambientais. Essas informacoes possibilitam a escolha correta das especies para diferentes usos e regioes do Pais. Ensina como fazer o plantio e o manejo do reflorestamento, indicando as praticas silviculturais que levam a uma boa comercializacao da madeira produtiva: producao de sementes florestais melhoradas, superacao de dormencia e armazenamento de sementes de especies para reflorestamento, producao de mudas de especies florestais. producao de mudas de especies nativas por sementes e a implantacao de povoamentos, propagacao vegetativa de especies florestais, materiais e procedimentos para producao de mudas por estaquia, implantacao de povoamentos florestais com especies de rapido crescimento, manejo e silvicultura de plantacoes de pinus em pequena propriedade rural, manejo de reforestamento de pinus com uso de computador, tecnicas de recuperacao e manejo de areas degradadas, sistemas agroflorestais: aspectos basicos e indicacoes. Concomitantemente, descreve os inumeros beneficios ambientais dos plantios florestais para o proprietario rural e para toda a sociedade.
650 $aagroforestry
650 $aBrazil
650 $adegradation
650 $aenvironmental degradation
650 $aenvironmental protection
650 $afarms
650 $aforest trees
650 $aforestry
650 $aforests
650 $areforestation
650 $arural areas
650 $aseed storage
650 $aseedlings
650 $atechnology
650 $awood
650 $aAgricultura
650 $aArmazenamento
650 $aDeterioração do Solo
650 $aEspécie
650 $aEssência Florestal
650 $aFloresta
650 $aMadeira
650 $aManejo
650 $aMeio Ambiente
650 $aMuda
650 $aPlanta
650 $aProdução
650 $aPropagação Vegetativa
650 $aPropriedade Rural
650 $aProteção Ambiental
650 $aRecuperação do Solo
650 $aReflorestamento
650 $aSemente
650 $aSilvicultura
650 $aVariedade
653 $aAgrofloresta
653 $aAspecto economico
653 $aBrasil
653 $aDegradacao
653 $aEconomic situation
653 $aEspecie florestal
653 $aEspecies florestal
653 $aFloresta - Brasil
653 $aflorestal
653 $aflorestas
653 $aFlorests
653 $aFloreta
653 $aForest
653 $aForest seedling
653 $aForest species
653 $aForestation
653 $aForestry specie
653 $aMadeira de reflorestamento
653 $aManagement
653 $aPlanting stock
653 $aProducÆo
653 $aProducao: Reforestation
653 $aProduction
653 $aProduction forests
653 $aProdutor rural
653 $aPropagação
653 $aPropagation
653 $aReclamation
653 $aRecuperacao
653 $aRecuperation
653 $aReflorestation
653 $aRural farms
653 $aRural properties
653 $aSeedling
653 $aSistema agroflorestal
653 $aSpecies
653 $aTecnica
653 $aUSe
653 $aUses
653 $aUso
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Florestas (CNPF) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
| Nenhum registro encontrado para a expressão de busca informada. |
|
|
