| |
|
|
|
Registro Completo |
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Caprinos e Ovinos. |
|
Data corrente: |
20/01/2016 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
05/12/2023 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Resumo em Anais de Congresso |
|
Autoria: |
ARAÚJO FILHO, J. A. de; GADELHA, J. A.; VIENA, O. J. |
|
Afiliação: |
JOÃO AMBRÓSIO DE ARAÚJO FILHO, CNPC; José Adalberto Gadelha, Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC) - Fortaleza, CE; Obed Jeronima Viana. |
|
Título: |
Complementary grazing by cattle, sheep and goat on the Caatinga of northeast Brazil. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
1982 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
In: INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON GOAT PRODUCTION AND DISEASE, 3., 1982, Tucson. Proceedings... Scottsdale: Dairy Goat Journal, 1982. p. 532 |
|
ISBN: |
0930848179 |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
Since the first settlers moved into the thorny deciduous forest of Northwestern Brazil, the Caatinga, common grazing cattle, sheep and goats has been used to harvest the range resources of that region. Research on a private ranch of Taua county at the Southwest corner the State of Ceara is evaluating the technical and economical viability of complementary grazing and the potential of the goats as a biological controller of invading brushes. Brush controls studied were: no control (A); chopping and burning of the ligneous species (B); selective herbicidal control of brushes and trees by one of the ruminant classes or combinations (C). During the dry season 1980, cattle lost weight at a treatment A and gained at treatments B and C. The average gains were: 19.3 kg, 4.8 kg and 26.0 kg per head for A, B and C respectively. During the wet season of 1981, the bovines averaged 59.3 kg, 73.6 kg and 101.7 kg of gains per head on A, B and C treatments. The goats gained 9.4 kg, 8.8 kg and 10.7 kg per head on A, B and C, during the dry season, and 3.6 kg, 11.2 kg and 8.9 kg per head on the same order of treatments during the wet season. Sheep showed identical performance as goats. Gains were depressed on treatment A during the wet season, but responded positively on treatment B and C. Goats did depress cattle weight gains at any treatment or season, but did not affect sheep gains. Sheep did not influence cattle gains, during the wet season. As for live weight production, goats were superior to any ruminants class or combination on treatments A and B during the dry season. Sheep presented the best performance on treatment C. For the whole year, goats were the best option for treatment A, the Native Caatinga. Goats, or goats plus cattle were the best for treatment B, and cattle or cattle plus sheep presented the best performance on treatment C MenosSince the first settlers moved into the thorny deciduous forest of Northwestern Brazil, the Caatinga, common grazing cattle, sheep and goats has been used to harvest the range resources of that region. Research on a private ranch of Taua county at the Southwest corner the State of Ceara is evaluating the technical and economical viability of complementary grazing and the potential of the goats as a biological controller of invading brushes. Brush controls studied were: no control (A); chopping and burning of the ligneous species (B); selective herbicidal control of brushes and trees by one of the ruminant classes or combinations (C). During the dry season 1980, cattle lost weight at a treatment A and gained at treatments B and C. The average gains were: 19.3 kg, 4.8 kg and 26.0 kg per head for A, B and C respectively. During the wet season of 1981, the bovines averaged 59.3 kg, 73.6 kg and 101.7 kg of gains per head on A, B and C treatments. The goats gained 9.4 kg, 8.8 kg and 10.7 kg per head on A, B and C, during the dry season, and 3.6 kg, 11.2 kg and 8.9 kg per head on the same order of treatments during the wet season. Sheep showed identical performance as goats. Gains were depressed on treatment A during the wet season, but responded positively on treatment B and C. Goats did depress cattle weight gains at any treatment or season, but did not affect sheep gains. Sheep did not influence cattle gains, during the wet season. As for live weight production, goats were super... Mostrar Tudo |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Semiárido. |
|
Thesagro: |
Caatinga; Caprino; Controle biológico; Ganho de peso; Ovino; Pastejo. |
|
Thesaurus Nal: |
Biological control; Brazil; Goats; Semiarid zones; Sheep; Weight gain. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
L Ciência Animal e Produtos de Origem Animal |
|
Marc: |
LEADER 02760nam a2200301 a 4500
001 2034592
005 2023-12-05
008 1982 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
020 $a0930848179
100 1 $aARAÚJO FILHO, J. A. de
245 $aComplementary grazing by cattle, sheep and goat on the Caatinga of northeast Brazil.$h[electronic resource]
260 $aIn: INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON GOAT PRODUCTION AND DISEASE, 3., 1982, Tucson. Proceedings... Scottsdale: Dairy Goat Journal, 1982. p. 532$c1982
520 $aSince the first settlers moved into the thorny deciduous forest of Northwestern Brazil, the Caatinga, common grazing cattle, sheep and goats has been used to harvest the range resources of that region. Research on a private ranch of Taua county at the Southwest corner the State of Ceara is evaluating the technical and economical viability of complementary grazing and the potential of the goats as a biological controller of invading brushes. Brush controls studied were: no control (A); chopping and burning of the ligneous species (B); selective herbicidal control of brushes and trees by one of the ruminant classes or combinations (C). During the dry season 1980, cattle lost weight at a treatment A and gained at treatments B and C. The average gains were: 19.3 kg, 4.8 kg and 26.0 kg per head for A, B and C respectively. During the wet season of 1981, the bovines averaged 59.3 kg, 73.6 kg and 101.7 kg of gains per head on A, B and C treatments. The goats gained 9.4 kg, 8.8 kg and 10.7 kg per head on A, B and C, during the dry season, and 3.6 kg, 11.2 kg and 8.9 kg per head on the same order of treatments during the wet season. Sheep showed identical performance as goats. Gains were depressed on treatment A during the wet season, but responded positively on treatment B and C. Goats did depress cattle weight gains at any treatment or season, but did not affect sheep gains. Sheep did not influence cattle gains, during the wet season. As for live weight production, goats were superior to any ruminants class or combination on treatments A and B during the dry season. Sheep presented the best performance on treatment C. For the whole year, goats were the best option for treatment A, the Native Caatinga. Goats, or goats plus cattle were the best for treatment B, and cattle or cattle plus sheep presented the best performance on treatment C
650 $aBiological control
650 $aBrazil
650 $aGoats
650 $aSemiarid zones
650 $aSheep
650 $aWeight gain
650 $aCaatinga
650 $aCaprino
650 $aControle biológico
650 $aGanho de peso
650 $aOvino
650 $aPastejo
653 $aSemiárido
700 1 $aGADELHA, J. A.
700 1 $aVIENA, O. J.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Caprinos e Ovinos (CNPC) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
URL |
Voltar
|
|
|
| Registros recuperados : 241 | |
| 71. |  | LEITE, E. R.; ARAUJO FILHO, J. A. de; MESQUITA, R. C. M. Ecossistema Semi-árido. In: PUIGNAU, J. P. (Ed.). Utilizacion y manejo de pastizales. Montevideo: IICA, 1994. p. 49-60. (IICA.PROCISUR. Dialogo, 40). Contem trabalhos apresentados: REUNION SOBRE UTILIZACION Y MANEJO DE PASTIZALES, 1988, Corumba, MS.| Tipo: Artigo em Anais de Congresso |
| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Caprinos e Ovinos. |
|    |
| 72. | | CAVALCANTE, A. C. R.; MOITA, A. K. F.; ARAUJO FILHO, J. A. de; BARBOSA, T. M. Determinação de produção da leucena (Leucaena leucocephala L.) em altas densidades. In: ENCONTRO DE INICIAÇÃO CIENTÍFICA DA UVA, 1., 1998; ENCONTRO DE INICIAÇÃO CIENTÍFICA DA UVA, 2., 2000, Sobral. Anais... Sobral: Universidade Estadual Vale do Acaraú, 2001. p. 14.| Tipo: Resumo em Anais de Congresso |
| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Caprinos e Ovinos. |
| |
| 80. | | ARAUJO FILHO, J. A. de; CARVALHO, F. C. de; GARCIA, R.; SOUSA, R. A. de. Efeitos da manipulação da vegetação lenhosa sobre a produção e compartimentalização da fitomassa pastável de uma caatinga sucessional. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia, Viçosa, MG, v. 31, n. 1, p. 11-19, 2002.| Tipo: Artigo em Periódico Indexado | Circulação/Nível: Internacional - A |
| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Caprinos e Ovinos. |
| |
| Registros recuperados : 241 | |
|
| Nenhum registro encontrado para a expressão de busca informada. |
|
|
