|
|
| Acesso ao texto completo restrito à biblioteca da Embrapa Amazônia Oriental. Para informações adicionais entre em contato com cpatu.biblioteca@embrapa.br. |
Registro Completo |
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Amazônia Oriental. |
Data corrente: |
21/12/2012 |
Data da última atualização: |
10/11/2022 |
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
Autoria: |
BARLOW, J.; PARRY, L.; GARDNER, T. A.; FERREIRA, J. N.; ARAGÃO, L. E. O. C.; CARMENTA, R.; BERENGUER, E.; VIEIRA, I. C. G.; SOUZA, C.; COCHRANE, M. A. |
Afiliação: |
JOS BARLOW, LANCASTER UNIVERSITY; LUKE PARRY, LANCASTER UNIVERSITY; TOBY A. GARDNER, LANCASTER UNIVERSITY / UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE; JOICE NUNES FERREIRA, CPATU; LUIZ E. O. C. ARAGÃO, UNIVERSITY OF EXETER; RAQUEL CARMENTA, LANCASTER UNIVERSITY; ERIKA BERENGUER, LANCASTER UNIVERISTY; IMA C. G. VIEIRA, MPEG; CARLOS SOUZA, IMAZON; MARK A. COCHRANE, SOUTH DAKOTA STATE UNIVERSITY. |
Título: |
The critical importance of considering fire in REDD+ programs. |
Ano de publicação: |
2012 |
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Biological Conservation, v. 154, p. 1-8, Oct. 2012. |
DOI: |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2012.03.034 |
Idioma: |
Inglês |
Conteúdo: |
Fires are increasingly responsible for forest degradation in the humid tropics due to the expansion of fire-dependent agriculture, fragmentation, intensive logging practices and severe droughts. However, these forest fires have been largely overlooked by negotiations for Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Degradation (REDD+). This paper examines how forest fires affect REDD+ schemes by compromising carbon permanence; undermining the potential of sustainable forest management and reforestation and regeneration activities in tropical countries; and threatening the additional benefits that can be accrued from REDD+, including biodiversity conservation and rural poverty alleviation. Narrowly focusing on avoiding deforestation, the sustainable management of forests or regeneration schemes will not always guarantee protection from fire occurrence, and investments in tropical forests may ultimately fail to achieve long-term emission reductions unless they also reduce the risk of forest fires. Integrating forest fire reduction into REDD+ presents many challenges, requiring: changes in agricultural practices that take place outside of the remaining forests; the monitoring and prediction of spatio-temporal patterns of forest fires across whole biomes; guarantees of additionality; avoiding leakage of fire-dependent agriculture; ensuring that responsibilities for fire management are fairly distributed; protection for rural livelihoods; and that any new activities result in positive outcomes for local people. MenosFires are increasingly responsible for forest degradation in the humid tropics due to the expansion of fire-dependent agriculture, fragmentation, intensive logging practices and severe droughts. However, these forest fires have been largely overlooked by negotiations for Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Degradation (REDD+). This paper examines how forest fires affect REDD+ schemes by compromising carbon permanence; undermining the potential of sustainable forest management and reforestation and regeneration activities in tropical countries; and threatening the additional benefits that can be accrued from REDD+, including biodiversity conservation and rural poverty alleviation. Narrowly focusing on avoiding deforestation, the sustainable management of forests or regeneration schemes will not always guarantee protection from fire occurrence, and investments in tropical forests may ultimately fail to achieve long-term emission reductions unless they also reduce the risk of forest fires. Integrating forest fire reduction into REDD+ presents many challenges, requiring: changes in agricultural practices that take place outside of the remaining forests; the monitoring and prediction of spatio-temporal patterns of forest fires across whole biomes; guarantees of additionality; avoiding leakage of fire-dependent agriculture; ensuring that responsibilities for fire management are fairly distributed; protection for rural livelihoods; and that any new activities result in positi... Mostrar Tudo |
Thesagro: |
Biodiversidade; Ecossistema; Floresta; Fogo. |
Categoria do assunto: |
P Recursos Naturais, Ciências Ambientais e da Terra |
Marc: |
LEADER 02334naa a2200289 a 4500 001 1943399 005 2022-11-10 008 2012 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d 024 7 $ahttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2012.03.034$2DOI 100 1 $aBARLOW, J. 245 $aThe critical importance of considering fire in REDD+ programs.$h[electronic resource] 260 $c2012 520 $aFires are increasingly responsible for forest degradation in the humid tropics due to the expansion of fire-dependent agriculture, fragmentation, intensive logging practices and severe droughts. However, these forest fires have been largely overlooked by negotiations for Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Degradation (REDD+). This paper examines how forest fires affect REDD+ schemes by compromising carbon permanence; undermining the potential of sustainable forest management and reforestation and regeneration activities in tropical countries; and threatening the additional benefits that can be accrued from REDD+, including biodiversity conservation and rural poverty alleviation. Narrowly focusing on avoiding deforestation, the sustainable management of forests or regeneration schemes will not always guarantee protection from fire occurrence, and investments in tropical forests may ultimately fail to achieve long-term emission reductions unless they also reduce the risk of forest fires. Integrating forest fire reduction into REDD+ presents many challenges, requiring: changes in agricultural practices that take place outside of the remaining forests; the monitoring and prediction of spatio-temporal patterns of forest fires across whole biomes; guarantees of additionality; avoiding leakage of fire-dependent agriculture; ensuring that responsibilities for fire management are fairly distributed; protection for rural livelihoods; and that any new activities result in positive outcomes for local people. 650 $aBiodiversidade 650 $aEcossistema 650 $aFloresta 650 $aFogo 700 1 $aPARRY, L. 700 1 $aGARDNER, T. A. 700 1 $aFERREIRA, J. N. 700 1 $aARAGÃO, L. E. O. C. 700 1 $aCARMENTA, R. 700 1 $aBERENGUER, E. 700 1 $aVIEIRA, I. C. G. 700 1 $aSOUZA, C. 700 1 $aCOCHRANE, M. A. 773 $tBiological Conservation$gv. 154, p. 1-8, Oct. 2012.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
Registro original: |
Embrapa Amazônia Oriental (CPATU) |
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
URL |
Voltar
|
|
Registros recuperados : 252 | |
147. | | MELO FILHO, G. A. de; RICHETTI, A. Manual de contas da empresa rural. In: REUNIAO DE PESQUISA DE SOJA DA REGIAO CENTRAL DO BRASIL, 21., 1999, Dourados. Resumos... Dourados: Embrapa Agropecuaria Oeste; Londrina: Embrapa Soja, 1999. p.44. (Embrapa Agropecuaria Oeste. Documentos, 7; Embrapa Soja. Documentos, 134).Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Agropecuária Oeste. |
| |
Registros recuperados : 252 | |
|
Nenhum registro encontrado para a expressão de busca informada. |
|
|