| |
|
|
 | Acesso ao texto completo restrito à biblioteca da Embrapa Soja. Para informações adicionais entre em contato com valeria.cardoso@embrapa.br. |
|
Registro Completo |
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Soja. |
|
Data corrente: |
03/02/2010 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
02/08/2017 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
|
Autoria: |
PAUCAR-MENACHO, L. M.; AMAYA-FARFÁN, J.; BERHOW, M. A.; MANDARINO, J. M. G.; MEJIA, E. G. de; CHANG, Y. K. |
|
Afiliação: |
LUZ MARIA PAUCAR-MANACHO, UNICAMP/UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS; JAIME AMAYA-FARFÁN, UNICAMP; MARK A. BERHOW, AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH SERVICE; JOSE MARCOS GONTIJO MANDARINO, CNPSo; ELVIRA GONZALEZ DE MEJIA, UNIVERSITY OG ILLINOIS; YOON KIL CHANG, UNICAMP. |
|
Título: |
A high-protein soybean cultivar contains lower isoflavones and saponins but higher minerals and bioactive peptides than a low-protein cultivar. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2010 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Food Chemistry, London, v. 120, n. 1, p. 15-21, mai. 2010. |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
Soybean is a major source of protein and other nutrients and non-nutrient bioactives for human health. The objective was to compare the bioactive compounds of a low-protein (BRS 133) soybean in comparison to a high-protein (BRS 258) soybean cultivar. The high-protein soybean contained 17% lower carbohydrates and a lower chemical score (63) in relation to the low-protein soybean, which had a higher chemical score (76), associated with the higher methionine content (1.2%). Cultivar BRS 258 had more calcium (15.5%), phosphorus (30.1%), iron (18.7%), copper (9.0%) and zinc (11.5%), and a higher concentrations of lunasin, BBI and lectin (20.3%, 19.0% and 27.1%, respectively) than the low-protein cultivar. BRS 133 had 75.4% higher concentration of total isoflavones (5.1% of total aglycones) and 31.0% total saponins, as compared to BRS 258. It was concluded that the low-protein soybean cultivar contained higher isoflavones and saponins, but lower levels of minerals and bioactive peptides, such as lunasin. |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Composto bioativo; Lunasin. |
|
Thesagro: |
Nutricao humana; Nutriente; Saude; Soja. |
|
Thesaurus Nal: |
Bioactive compounds; Human health; Human nutrition; Soybeans. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
Q Alimentos e Nutrição Humana |
|
Marc: |
LEADER 01888naa a2200301 a 4500
001 1632056
005 2017-08-02
008 2010 bl --- 0-- u #d
100 1 $aPAUCAR-MENACHO, L. M.
245 $aA high-protein soybean cultivar contains lower isoflavones and saponins but higher minerals and bioactive peptides than a low-protein cultivar.
260 $c2010
520 $aSoybean is a major source of protein and other nutrients and non-nutrient bioactives for human health. The objective was to compare the bioactive compounds of a low-protein (BRS 133) soybean in comparison to a high-protein (BRS 258) soybean cultivar. The high-protein soybean contained 17% lower carbohydrates and a lower chemical score (63) in relation to the low-protein soybean, which had a higher chemical score (76), associated with the higher methionine content (1.2%). Cultivar BRS 258 had more calcium (15.5%), phosphorus (30.1%), iron (18.7%), copper (9.0%) and zinc (11.5%), and a higher concentrations of lunasin, BBI and lectin (20.3%, 19.0% and 27.1%, respectively) than the low-protein cultivar. BRS 133 had 75.4% higher concentration of total isoflavones (5.1% of total aglycones) and 31.0% total saponins, as compared to BRS 258. It was concluded that the low-protein soybean cultivar contained higher isoflavones and saponins, but lower levels of minerals and bioactive peptides, such as lunasin.
650 $aBioactive compounds
650 $aHuman health
650 $aHuman nutrition
650 $aSoybeans
650 $aNutricao humana
650 $aNutriente
650 $aSaude
650 $aSoja
653 $aComposto bioativo
653 $aLunasin
700 1 $aAMAYA-FARFÁN, J.
700 1 $aBERHOW, M. A.
700 1 $aMANDARINO, J. M. G.
700 1 $aMEJIA, E. G. de
700 1 $aCHANG, Y. K.
773 $tFood Chemistry, London$gv. 120, n. 1, p. 15-21, mai. 2010.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Soja (CNPSO) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
URL |
Voltar
|
|
|
Registro Completo
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Amapá. |
|
Data corrente: |
12/04/2016 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
13/03/2017 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
|
Circulação/Nível: |
B - 1 |
|
Autoria: |
GONÇALVES, R. A.; OLIVEIRA, M. S. B.; NEVES, L. R.; TAVARES-DIAS, M. |
|
Afiliação: |
MARCOS TAVARES-DIAS, CPAF-AP. |
|
Título: |
Seasonal pattern in parasite infracommunities of Hoplerythrinus unitaeniatus and Hoplias malabaricus (Actinopterygii: Erythrinidae) from the Brazilian Amazon. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2016 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Acta Parasitologica, v. 61, n. 1, p. 119-129, 2016. |
|
DOI: |
10.1515/ap-2016-0016 |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
The present study investigated the effects of seasonal variation in parasites infracommunities of Hoplerythrinus unitaeniatus and Hoplias malabaricus from a tributary of Amazon River. For H. unitaeniatus and H. malabaricus, 11 parasite species were similar, and greatest parasite richness occurred during the rainy season. Ichthyophthirius multifiliis was the dominant parasite species for both hosts. In H. unitaeniatus, infection by Whittingtonocotyle caetei, Whittingtonocotyle jeju, Urocleidoides sp. and Anacanthorus sp. was higher during rainy season. Contracaecum sp., Procamallanus (Spirocamallanus) inopinatus, Nomimoscolex matogrossensis and Gorytocephalus spectabilis showed no seasonal pattern. For H. unitaeniatus, P. pillulare, Clinostomum marginatum and Argulus pestifer occurred only during dry season, while Trichodina sp., Dolops geayi, undetermined metacercariae and Posthodiplostomum sp. occurred only during the rainy season. In H. malabaricus, the prevalence of Urocleidoides eremitus was similar during the two seasons, but abundance was higher during the rainy season. Tetrahymena sp., C. marginatum, Dendrorchis neivai, undetermined metacercariae, Posthodiplostomum sp., Genarchella genarchella, Cystidicoloides sp., G. spectabilis, D. geayi, A. pestifer and Glossiphonidae gen. sp. occurred only during the dry season. However, Contracaecum sp. and P. (S.) inopinatus occurred during both seasons, but the prevalence of P. (S.) inopinatus was higher during the rainy season. Seasonal variation in this infection levels was due to the host?s feeding behavior and habits and the availability of infectious forms of parasites with heteroxenic life cycles. The non-seasonal fluctuation detected are likely a result of the parasites biology, highly variable nature of this tributary of Amazon River and low abundance of parasites. MenosThe present study investigated the effects of seasonal variation in parasites infracommunities of Hoplerythrinus unitaeniatus and Hoplias malabaricus from a tributary of Amazon River. For H. unitaeniatus and H. malabaricus, 11 parasite species were similar, and greatest parasite richness occurred during the rainy season. Ichthyophthirius multifiliis was the dominant parasite species for both hosts. In H. unitaeniatus, infection by Whittingtonocotyle caetei, Whittingtonocotyle jeju, Urocleidoides sp. and Anacanthorus sp. was higher during rainy season. Contracaecum sp., Procamallanus (Spirocamallanus) inopinatus, Nomimoscolex matogrossensis and Gorytocephalus spectabilis showed no seasonal pattern. For H. unitaeniatus, P. pillulare, Clinostomum marginatum and Argulus pestifer occurred only during dry season, while Trichodina sp., Dolops geayi, undetermined metacercariae and Posthodiplostomum sp. occurred only during the rainy season. In H. malabaricus, the prevalence of Urocleidoides eremitus was similar during the two seasons, but abundance was higher during the rainy season. Tetrahymena sp., C. marginatum, Dendrorchis neivai, undetermined metacercariae, Posthodiplostomum sp., Genarchella genarchella, Cystidicoloides sp., G. spectabilis, D. geayi, A. pestifer and Glossiphonidae gen. sp. occurred only during the dry season. However, Contracaecum sp. and P. (S.) inopinatus occurred during both seasons, but the prevalence of P. (S.) inopinatus was higher during the rainy season... Mostrar Tudo |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Amazon; Animal parasite. |
|
Thesagro: |
Parasito de animal; Variação sazonal. |
|
Thesaurus NAL: |
Amazonia; seasonal variation. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
S Ciências Biológicas |
|
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/item/142253/1/CPAF-AP-2016-Seasonal-pattern-in-parasite.pdf
|
|
Marc: |
LEADER 02635naa a2200241 a 4500
001 2043200
005 2017-03-13
008 2016 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
024 7 $a10.1515/ap-2016-0016$2DOI
100 1 $aGONÇALVES, R. A.
245 $aSeasonal pattern in parasite infracommunities of Hoplerythrinus unitaeniatus and Hoplias malabaricus (Actinopterygii$bErythrinidae) from the Brazilian Amazon.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2016
520 $aThe present study investigated the effects of seasonal variation in parasites infracommunities of Hoplerythrinus unitaeniatus and Hoplias malabaricus from a tributary of Amazon River. For H. unitaeniatus and H. malabaricus, 11 parasite species were similar, and greatest parasite richness occurred during the rainy season. Ichthyophthirius multifiliis was the dominant parasite species for both hosts. In H. unitaeniatus, infection by Whittingtonocotyle caetei, Whittingtonocotyle jeju, Urocleidoides sp. and Anacanthorus sp. was higher during rainy season. Contracaecum sp., Procamallanus (Spirocamallanus) inopinatus, Nomimoscolex matogrossensis and Gorytocephalus spectabilis showed no seasonal pattern. For H. unitaeniatus, P. pillulare, Clinostomum marginatum and Argulus pestifer occurred only during dry season, while Trichodina sp., Dolops geayi, undetermined metacercariae and Posthodiplostomum sp. occurred only during the rainy season. In H. malabaricus, the prevalence of Urocleidoides eremitus was similar during the two seasons, but abundance was higher during the rainy season. Tetrahymena sp., C. marginatum, Dendrorchis neivai, undetermined metacercariae, Posthodiplostomum sp., Genarchella genarchella, Cystidicoloides sp., G. spectabilis, D. geayi, A. pestifer and Glossiphonidae gen. sp. occurred only during the dry season. However, Contracaecum sp. and P. (S.) inopinatus occurred during both seasons, but the prevalence of P. (S.) inopinatus was higher during the rainy season. Seasonal variation in this infection levels was due to the host?s feeding behavior and habits and the availability of infectious forms of parasites with heteroxenic life cycles. The non-seasonal fluctuation detected are likely a result of the parasites biology, highly variable nature of this tributary of Amazon River and low abundance of parasites.
650 $aAmazonia
650 $aseasonal variation
650 $aParasito de animal
650 $aVariação sazonal
653 $aAmazon
653 $aAnimal parasite
700 1 $aOLIVEIRA, M. S. B.
700 1 $aNEVES, L. R.
700 1 $aTAVARES-DIAS, M.
773 $tActa Parasitologica$gv. 61, n. 1, p. 119-129, 2016.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Amapá (CPAF-AP) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
| Expressão de busca inválida. Verifique!!! |
|
|
