| |
|
|
|
Registro Completo |
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Rondônia. |
|
Data corrente: |
26/03/2007 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
26/03/2007 |
|
Autoria: |
ALBUQUERQUE, F. C. de. |
|
Título: |
Mancha parda das folhas da castanheira do Para, causada por uma nova especie de fungo. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
1960 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Belem: IAN, 1960, |
|
Páginas: |
p. 3-22 |
|
Série: |
(IAN. Boletim Técnico, 038). |
|
Idioma: |
Português |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Brazil nut; Brown spot; Castanha do brasil; Cercospora bertholletiae; Control; Controle; Disease. |
|
Thesagro: |
Doença; Fungo; Mancha Parda. |
|
Thesaurus Nal: |
fungi. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
-- |
|
Marc: |
LEADER 00673nam a2200253 a 4500
001 1707877
005 2007-03-26
008 1960 bl uuuu u0uu1 u #d
100 1 $aALBUQUERQUE, F. C. de
245 $aMancha parda das folhas da castanheira do Para, causada por uma nova especie de fungo.
260 $aBelem: IAN, 1960,$c1960
300 $ap. 3-22
490 $a(IAN. Boletim Técnico, 038).
650 $afungi
650 $aDoença
650 $aFungo
650 $aMancha Parda
653 $aBrazil nut
653 $aBrown spot
653 $aCastanha do brasil
653 $aCercospora bertholletiae
653 $aControl
653 $aControle
653 $aDisease
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Rondônia (CPAF-RO) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
URL |
Voltar
|
|
|
 | Acesso ao texto completo restrito à biblioteca da Embrapa Unidades Centrais. Para informações adicionais entre em contato com biblioteca@embrapa.br. |
Registro Completo
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Unidades Centrais. |
|
Data corrente: |
23/04/1998 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
27/11/2008 |
|
Autoria: |
PINTO, A. de A. |
|
Título: |
International savanna literature: a comparison of sources relevant to Brazilian researchers. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
1981 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
1981. |
|
Páginas: |
98p. |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Notas: |
Dissertação (Mestrado) - Denver: University of Denver-USA. |
|
Conteúdo: |
This study encompasses evaluations of the resources CAB abstracts, AGRICOLA and the Brazilian bibliography of savanna as information sources to supply Brazilian researchers information needs. The first evaluation, Regarding the use of the world literature on savanna agriculture, was based on 65 questionnaires applied in Brazil. The second evaluation, Regarding the structure of CAB and AGRICOLA databases, consists of an analysis of two printouts corresponding to retrospective on-line searches in these databases for the period 1972-1981. Finally, the study includes bibliometric analysis of the Brazilian bibliography of savanna which is compared to the other two resources for the Brazilian literature in agriculture of savanna. It was found that 31,21% of the 612 relevant citations recorded by AGRICOLA and 15.12% of the 1637 recorded CAB are from the Brazilian literature in this subject. CAB and AGRICOLA, when compared with the Brazilian bibliography of savanna,are weak information sources relating to this subject. Most users of savanna literature preferred CAB abstracts to AGRICOLA because of the presence of abstracts and because of the subject coverage. A very high percentage of the international literature indexed in CAB and AGRICOLA can be absorbed by Brazilian researchers in this field without any any language problems. Altho ough all the three resouces analyzed are incomplete, the Brazilian bibliography of savanna consistently suppies much more information in the main areas of the Brazilian research programs on cerrado than CAB and AGRICOLA. MenosThis study encompasses evaluations of the resources CAB abstracts, AGRICOLA and the Brazilian bibliography of savanna as information sources to supply Brazilian researchers information needs. The first evaluation, Regarding the use of the world literature on savanna agriculture, was based on 65 questionnaires applied in Brazil. The second evaluation, Regarding the structure of CAB and AGRICOLA databases, consists of an analysis of two printouts corresponding to retrospective on-line searches in these databases for the period 1972-1981. Finally, the study includes bibliometric analysis of the Brazilian bibliography of savanna which is compared to the other two resources for the Brazilian literature in agriculture of savanna. It was found that 31,21% of the 612 relevant citations recorded by AGRICOLA and 15.12% of the 1637 recorded CAB are from the Brazilian literature in this subject. CAB and AGRICOLA, when compared with the Brazilian bibliography of savanna,are weak information sources relating to this subject. Most users of savanna literature preferred CAB abstracts to AGRICOLA because of the presence of abstracts and because of the subject coverage. A very high percentage of the international literature indexed in CAB and AGRICOLA can be absorbed by Brazilian researchers in this field without any any language problems. Altho ough all the three resouces analyzed are incomplete, the Brazilian bibliography of savanna consistently suppies much more information in the main area... Mostrar Tudo |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Ciência; Informação; Savana; Savanna; Science. |
|
Thesagro: |
Cerrado. |
|
Thesaurus NAL: |
information. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
-- |
|
Marc: |
LEADER 02154nam a2200217 a 4500
001 1092152
005 2008-11-27
008 1981 bl uuuu m 00u1 u #d
100 1 $aPINTO, A. de A.
245 $aInternational savanna literature$ba comparison of sources relevant to Brazilian researchers.
260 $a1981.$c1981
300 $a98p.
500 $aDissertação (Mestrado) - Denver: University of Denver-USA.
520 $aThis study encompasses evaluations of the resources CAB abstracts, AGRICOLA and the Brazilian bibliography of savanna as information sources to supply Brazilian researchers information needs. The first evaluation, Regarding the use of the world literature on savanna agriculture, was based on 65 questionnaires applied in Brazil. The second evaluation, Regarding the structure of CAB and AGRICOLA databases, consists of an analysis of two printouts corresponding to retrospective on-line searches in these databases for the period 1972-1981. Finally, the study includes bibliometric analysis of the Brazilian bibliography of savanna which is compared to the other two resources for the Brazilian literature in agriculture of savanna. It was found that 31,21% of the 612 relevant citations recorded by AGRICOLA and 15.12% of the 1637 recorded CAB are from the Brazilian literature in this subject. CAB and AGRICOLA, when compared with the Brazilian bibliography of savanna,are weak information sources relating to this subject. Most users of savanna literature preferred CAB abstracts to AGRICOLA because of the presence of abstracts and because of the subject coverage. A very high percentage of the international literature indexed in CAB and AGRICOLA can be absorbed by Brazilian researchers in this field without any any language problems. Altho ough all the three resouces analyzed are incomplete, the Brazilian bibliography of savanna consistently suppies much more information in the main areas of the Brazilian research programs on cerrado than CAB and AGRICOLA.
650 $ainformation
650 $aCerrado
653 $aCiência
653 $aInformação
653 $aSavana
653 $aSavanna
653 $aScience
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Unidades Centrais (AI-SEDE) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
| Expressão de busca inválida. Verifique!!! |
|
|
