| |
|
|
 | Acesso ao texto completo restrito à biblioteca da Embrapa Soja. Para informações adicionais entre em contato com valeria.cardoso@embrapa.br. |
|
Registro Completo |
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Soja. |
|
Data corrente: |
03/02/2010 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
02/08/2017 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
|
Autoria: |
PAUCAR-MENACHO, L. M.; AMAYA-FARFÁN, J.; BERHOW, M. A.; MANDARINO, J. M. G.; MEJIA, E. G. de; CHANG, Y. K. |
|
Afiliação: |
LUZ MARIA PAUCAR-MANACHO, UNICAMP/UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS; JAIME AMAYA-FARFÁN, UNICAMP; MARK A. BERHOW, AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH SERVICE; JOSE MARCOS GONTIJO MANDARINO, CNPSo; ELVIRA GONZALEZ DE MEJIA, UNIVERSITY OG ILLINOIS; YOON KIL CHANG, UNICAMP. |
|
Título: |
A high-protein soybean cultivar contains lower isoflavones and saponins but higher minerals and bioactive peptides than a low-protein cultivar. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2010 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Food Chemistry, London, v. 120, n. 1, p. 15-21, mai. 2010. |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
Soybean is a major source of protein and other nutrients and non-nutrient bioactives for human health. The objective was to compare the bioactive compounds of a low-protein (BRS 133) soybean in comparison to a high-protein (BRS 258) soybean cultivar. The high-protein soybean contained 17% lower carbohydrates and a lower chemical score (63) in relation to the low-protein soybean, which had a higher chemical score (76), associated with the higher methionine content (1.2%). Cultivar BRS 258 had more calcium (15.5%), phosphorus (30.1%), iron (18.7%), copper (9.0%) and zinc (11.5%), and a higher concentrations of lunasin, BBI and lectin (20.3%, 19.0% and 27.1%, respectively) than the low-protein cultivar. BRS 133 had 75.4% higher concentration of total isoflavones (5.1% of total aglycones) and 31.0% total saponins, as compared to BRS 258. It was concluded that the low-protein soybean cultivar contained higher isoflavones and saponins, but lower levels of minerals and bioactive peptides, such as lunasin. |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Composto bioativo; Lunasin. |
|
Thesagro: |
Nutricao humana; Nutriente; Saude; Soja. |
|
Thesaurus Nal: |
Bioactive compounds; Human health; Human nutrition; Soybeans. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
Q Alimentos e Nutrição Humana |
|
Marc: |
LEADER 01888naa a2200301 a 4500
001 1632056
005 2017-08-02
008 2010 bl --- 0-- u #d
100 1 $aPAUCAR-MENACHO, L. M.
245 $aA high-protein soybean cultivar contains lower isoflavones and saponins but higher minerals and bioactive peptides than a low-protein cultivar.
260 $c2010
520 $aSoybean is a major source of protein and other nutrients and non-nutrient bioactives for human health. The objective was to compare the bioactive compounds of a low-protein (BRS 133) soybean in comparison to a high-protein (BRS 258) soybean cultivar. The high-protein soybean contained 17% lower carbohydrates and a lower chemical score (63) in relation to the low-protein soybean, which had a higher chemical score (76), associated with the higher methionine content (1.2%). Cultivar BRS 258 had more calcium (15.5%), phosphorus (30.1%), iron (18.7%), copper (9.0%) and zinc (11.5%), and a higher concentrations of lunasin, BBI and lectin (20.3%, 19.0% and 27.1%, respectively) than the low-protein cultivar. BRS 133 had 75.4% higher concentration of total isoflavones (5.1% of total aglycones) and 31.0% total saponins, as compared to BRS 258. It was concluded that the low-protein soybean cultivar contained higher isoflavones and saponins, but lower levels of minerals and bioactive peptides, such as lunasin.
650 $aBioactive compounds
650 $aHuman health
650 $aHuman nutrition
650 $aSoybeans
650 $aNutricao humana
650 $aNutriente
650 $aSaude
650 $aSoja
653 $aComposto bioativo
653 $aLunasin
700 1 $aAMAYA-FARFÁN, J.
700 1 $aBERHOW, M. A.
700 1 $aMANDARINO, J. M. G.
700 1 $aMEJIA, E. G. de
700 1 $aCHANG, Y. K.
773 $tFood Chemistry, London$gv. 120, n. 1, p. 15-21, mai. 2010.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Soja (CNPSO) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
URL |
Voltar
|
|
|
| Acesso ao texto completo restrito à biblioteca da Embrapa Agrobiologia. Para informações adicionais entre em contato com cnpab.biblioteca@embrapa.br. |
Registro Completo
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Agrobiologia. |
|
Data corrente: |
11/03/2021 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
11/03/2021 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
|
Circulação/Nível: |
A - 2 |
|
Autoria: |
MATOS, P. S.; FONTE, S. J.; LIMA, S. S.; PEREIRA, M. G.; KELLY, C.; DAMIEN, J. M.; MARCELO ANTONIOL FONTES; CHAER, G. M.; BRASIL, F. C.; ZONTA, E. |
|
Afiliação: |
PRISCILA S. MATOS, UFRRJ; STEVEN J. FONTE, Colorado State Universit; SANDRA S. LIMA, UFRRJ; MARCO GERVASIO PEREIRA, UFRRJ; COURTLAND KELLY, COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY; JÚNIOR M. DAMIAN, USP; MARCELO ANTONIOL FONTES, CNPAB; GUILHERME MONTANDON CHAER, CNPAB; FELIPE C. BRASIL, AMBIENTE BRASIL; EVERALDO ZONTA, UFRRJ. |
|
Título: |
Linkages among soil properties and litter quality in agroforestry systems of Southeastern Brazil. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2020 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Sustainability, v. 12, 9752, 2020. |
|
ISSN: |
2071-1050 |
|
DOI: |
10.3390/su12229752 |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
Agroforestry systems have been promoted as a solution to address trade-offs betweenenvironmental conservation efforts and the need for increased agricultural productivity on smallholderfarms in Brazil. However, the impact of land use change from degraded pasture to agroforestryon soil properties remains unclear. The objectives of this research were to: (1) assess soil chemical,physical and biological properties across distinct land uses (degraded pasture, agroforestry andsecondary forest); and (2) understand relationships between litter quality, soil organic matter (SOM)and key soil quality parameters in the Brazilian Atlantic Rainforest. Soils, macroinvertebrates andlitter were collected in April and September of 2018 under five land uses, including: three typesof agroforestry systems, a degraded pasture and a secondary forest in Sapucaia, Rio de Janeiro,Brazil. Our results showed that soil properties clearly separated the three agroforestry systems plots(AS1, AS2, AS3) from the forest and pasture plots. Moreover, litter quality and SOM likely influencemultiple biological and physiochemical soil properties under agroforestry systems and secondaryforest. Our findings suggest that agroforestry systems can help support soil biological, chemical andphysical properties and that the litter quality may be an important driver of their effects and potentialcontributions to soil restoration in the region |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
CN ratio. |
|
Thesaurus NAL: |
Forest restoration; Pastures; Secondary forests; Soil organic matter; Soil quality; Soil restoration. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
K Ciência Florestal e Produtos de Origem Vegetal |
|
Marc: |
LEADER 02347naa a2200337 a 4500
001 2130624
005 2021-03-11
008 2020 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
022 $a2071-1050
024 7 $a10.3390/su12229752$2DOI
100 1 $aMATOS, P. S.
245 $aLinkages among soil properties and litter quality in agroforestry systems of Southeastern Brazil.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2020
520 $aAgroforestry systems have been promoted as a solution to address trade-offs betweenenvironmental conservation efforts and the need for increased agricultural productivity on smallholderfarms in Brazil. However, the impact of land use change from degraded pasture to agroforestryon soil properties remains unclear. The objectives of this research were to: (1) assess soil chemical,physical and biological properties across distinct land uses (degraded pasture, agroforestry andsecondary forest); and (2) understand relationships between litter quality, soil organic matter (SOM)and key soil quality parameters in the Brazilian Atlantic Rainforest. Soils, macroinvertebrates andlitter were collected in April and September of 2018 under five land uses, including: three typesof agroforestry systems, a degraded pasture and a secondary forest in Sapucaia, Rio de Janeiro,Brazil. Our results showed that soil properties clearly separated the three agroforestry systems plots(AS1, AS2, AS3) from the forest and pasture plots. Moreover, litter quality and SOM likely influencemultiple biological and physiochemical soil properties under agroforestry systems and secondaryforest. Our findings suggest that agroforestry systems can help support soil biological, chemical andphysical properties and that the litter quality may be an important driver of their effects and potentialcontributions to soil restoration in the region
650 $aForest restoration
650 $aPastures
650 $aSecondary forests
650 $aSoil organic matter
650 $aSoil quality
650 $aSoil restoration
653 $aCN ratio
700 1 $aFONTE, S. J.
700 1 $aLIMA, S. S.
700 1 $aPEREIRA, M. G.
700 1 $aKELLY, C.
700 1 $aDAMIEN, J. M.
700 1 $aMARCELO ANTONIOL FONTES
700 1 $aCHAER, G. M.
700 1 $aBRASIL, F. C.
700 1 $aZONTA, E.
773 $tSustainability$gv. 12, 9752, 2020.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Agrobiologia (CNPAB) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
| Expressão de busca inválida. Verifique!!! |
|
|
