| |
|
|
 | Acesso ao texto completo restrito à biblioteca da Embrapa Clima Temperado. Para informações adicionais entre em contato com cpact.biblioteca@embrapa.br. |
|
Registro Completo |
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Clima Temperado. |
|
Data corrente: |
13/01/2023 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
27/03/2023 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
|
Autoria: |
CONCENÇO, G.; ANDRES, A.; SILVA, L. B. X. DA; MELO, T. S.; CAMPOS A. D. S. DE; SINNEMANN, C. S. |
|
Afiliação: |
GERMANI CONCENCO, CPACT; ANDRE ANDRES, CPACT; LARYSSA BARBOSA XAVIER DA SILVA, UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DE PELOTAS; THAÍS STRADIOTO MELO, UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DE PELOTAS; ALEXSSANDRA DAYANE SOARES DE CAMPOS, UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DE PELOTAS; CAMILA SILVEIRA SINNEMANN, UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DE PELOTAS. |
|
Título: |
Carryover of [imazapic + imazapyr] on differents crops systems in lowland areas with Clearfield® rice. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2022 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Revista Brasileira de Ciências Agrárias, v. 17, n. 3, e2127, 2022. |
|
Páginas: |
10 p. |
|
ISSN: |
1981-0997 |
|
DOI: |
0.5039/agraria.v17i3a2127 |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
Clearfield® technology is an important tool for chemical weed management in rice fields, however, carryover of these herbicides is still a concern for crops in succession. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the impact of the herbicide Kifix® (imazapic + imazapyr) associated with Clearfield® technology of rice crops on ryegrass in succession, as well as on non-Clearfield® rice and soybean grown in rotation, in addition to the control potential of jointvetch (Aeschynomene rudis and A. denticulata) from 2016 to 2018. The experiments comprised the application of Kifix® to Clearfield® rice grown in the first experimental year, evaluating its impact (1st summer) on ryegrass grown the following winter, as well as on soybean, rice and non-Clearfield® rice grown the following summer (2nd summer). The results reported reductions in jointvetch density and infestation as Kifix® doses increased; as well as mild damage from Kifix® residues on ryegrass sown in succession to Clearfield® rice, as well as on non-Clearfield® rice and soybean in rotation to Clearfield® rice. In addition, the possibility of residue accumulation of Kifix® in the soil after repeated applications should be verified in further studies. |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Clearfield; Imidazolinona. |
|
Thesagro: |
Arroz; Azevém; Erva Daninha; Manejo; Oryza Sativa; Soja. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
-- |
|
Marc: |
LEADER 02103naa a2200313 a 4500
001 2150964
005 2023-03-27
008 2022 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
022 $a1981-0997
024 7 $a0.5039/agraria.v17i3a2127$2DOI
100 1 $aCONCENÇO, G.
245 $aCarryover of [imazapic + imazapyr] on differents crops systems in lowland areas with Clearfield® rice.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2022
300 $a10 p.
520 $aClearfield® technology is an important tool for chemical weed management in rice fields, however, carryover of these herbicides is still a concern for crops in succession. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the impact of the herbicide Kifix® (imazapic + imazapyr) associated with Clearfield® technology of rice crops on ryegrass in succession, as well as on non-Clearfield® rice and soybean grown in rotation, in addition to the control potential of jointvetch (Aeschynomene rudis and A. denticulata) from 2016 to 2018. The experiments comprised the application of Kifix® to Clearfield® rice grown in the first experimental year, evaluating its impact (1st summer) on ryegrass grown the following winter, as well as on soybean, rice and non-Clearfield® rice grown the following summer (2nd summer). The results reported reductions in jointvetch density and infestation as Kifix® doses increased; as well as mild damage from Kifix® residues on ryegrass sown in succession to Clearfield® rice, as well as on non-Clearfield® rice and soybean in rotation to Clearfield® rice. In addition, the possibility of residue accumulation of Kifix® in the soil after repeated applications should be verified in further studies.
650 $aArroz
650 $aAzevém
650 $aErva Daninha
650 $aManejo
650 $aOryza Sativa
650 $aSoja
653 $aClearfield
653 $aImidazolinona
700 1 $aANDRES, A.
700 1 $aSILVA, L. B. X. DA
700 1 $aMELO, T. S.
700 1 $aCAMPOS A. D. S. DE
700 1 $aSINNEMANN, C. S.
773 $tRevista Brasileira de Ciências Agrárias$gv. 17, n. 3, e2127, 2022.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Clima Temperado (CPACT) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
URL |
Voltar
|
|
|
Registro Completo
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Clima Temperado; Embrapa Uva e Vinho. |
|
Data corrente: |
28/11/2023 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
12/03/2024 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
|
Circulação/Nível: |
A - 2 |
|
Autoria: |
PIOVESAN, B.; CONTRERAS MIRANDA, J. A.; GONÇALVES, R. da S.; NÖRNBERG, S. D.; BERNARDI, D.; BOTTON, M.; NAVA, D. E. |
|
Afiliação: |
BRUNA PIOVESAN, UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DE PELOTAS; JAVIER ANTONIO CONTRERAS MIRANDA, UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DE PELOTAS; RAFAEL DA SILVA GONÇALVES, PARTAMON; SANDRO DANIEL NÖRNBERG, PARTAMON; DANIEL BERNARDI, UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DE PELOTAS; MARCOS BOTTON, CNPUV; DORI EDSON NAVA, CPACT. |
|
Título: |
Lethal and sublethal effects of toxic bait formulations on Doryctobracon areolatus (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) and implications for integrated fruit fly management. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2023 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Journal of Economic Entomology, v. 116, n. 3, p. 855-863, Jun. 2023. |
|
DOI: |
https://doi.org/10.1093/jee/toad069 |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Notas: |
Online first. Accepted on 17 March 2023. |
|
Conteúdo: |
The use of toxic baits has become one of the main methods of management of fruit flies in Brazil. The application of toxic baits may cause side effects on the native parasitoid Doryctobracon areolatus (Hymenoptera: Braconidae). Based on the results, formulations made from the food attractants 3% Biofruit, 1.5% Ceratrap, 1.25% Flyral, 3% Isca Samaritá, 3% Isca Samaritá Tradicional, and 7% sugarcane molasses associated with the Malathion 1000 EC and the ready-to-use toxic bait Gelsura (containing the active ingredient alphacypermethrin) were classified as harmful (class 4) to D. areolatus (mortality > 85% at 96 HAE). In contrast, for toxic baits formulated with insecticide phosmet, the mortality ranged from 38% to 72%, classified as slightly harmful or moderately harmful. However, when phosmet was added to the 3% Samaritá Tradicional bait, the mortality was only 3.9% (class 1—harmless), similar to the toxicity observed for the Success 0.02 CB ready-to-use bait (0.24 g a.i. spinosad/l) (<5% mortality). Although toxic baits were formulated with spinosyn-based insecticides, all toxic bait formulations were classified as harmless or slightly harmful (<50% mortality) to D. areolatus, with the exception of 1.5% Ceratrap + spinetoram and 7% Sugarcane molasses + spinosad (≈ 60% mortality—moderately harmful). In addition, these formulations did not show sublethal effects in reducing the parasitism and emergence rate of the F1 generation of D. areolatus in A. fraterculus larvae. The results serve as a basis for the correct use of toxic food baits without affecting the biological control. MenosThe use of toxic baits has become one of the main methods of management of fruit flies in Brazil. The application of toxic baits may cause side effects on the native parasitoid Doryctobracon areolatus (Hymenoptera: Braconidae). Based on the results, formulations made from the food attractants 3% Biofruit, 1.5% Ceratrap, 1.25% Flyral, 3% Isca Samaritá, 3% Isca Samaritá Tradicional, and 7% sugarcane molasses associated with the Malathion 1000 EC and the ready-to-use toxic bait Gelsura (containing the active ingredient alphacypermethrin) were classified as harmful (class 4) to D. areolatus (mortality > 85% at 96 HAE). In contrast, for toxic baits formulated with insecticide phosmet, the mortality ranged from 38% to 72%, classified as slightly harmful or moderately harmful. However, when phosmet was added to the 3% Samaritá Tradicional bait, the mortality was only 3.9% (class 1—harmless), similar to the toxicity observed for the Success 0.02 CB ready-to-use bait (0.24 g a.i. spinosad/l) (<5% mortality). Although toxic baits were formulated with spinosyn-based insecticides, all toxic bait formulations were classified as harmless or slightly harmful (<50% mortality) to D. areolatus, with the exception of 1.5% Ceratrap + spinetoram and 7% Sugarcane molasses + spinosad (≈ 60% mortality—moderately harmful). In addition, these formulations did not show sublethal effects in reducing the parasitism and emergence rate of the F1 generation of D. areolatus in A. fraterculus larvae. The res... Mostrar Tudo |
|
Thesagro: |
Mosca das Frutas. |
|
Thesaurus NAL: |
Doryctobracon areolatus. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
-- |
|
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/doc/1158824/1/Piovesan-etal-JournalOfEconomicEntomology-2023.pdf
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/doc/1158799/1/Artigo-6-Journal-of-Economic-Entomology.pdf
|
|
Marc: |
LEADER 02475naa a2200241 a 4500
001 2158824
005 2024-03-12
008 2023 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
024 7 $ahttps://doi.org/10.1093/jee/toad069$2DOI
100 1 $aPIOVESAN, B.
245 $aLethal and sublethal effects of toxic bait formulations on Doryctobracon areolatus (Hymenoptera$bBraconidae) and implications for integrated fruit fly management.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2023
500 $aOnline first. Accepted on 17 March 2023.
520 $aThe use of toxic baits has become one of the main methods of management of fruit flies in Brazil. The application of toxic baits may cause side effects on the native parasitoid Doryctobracon areolatus (Hymenoptera: Braconidae). Based on the results, formulations made from the food attractants 3% Biofruit, 1.5% Ceratrap, 1.25% Flyral, 3% Isca Samaritá, 3% Isca Samaritá Tradicional, and 7% sugarcane molasses associated with the Malathion 1000 EC and the ready-to-use toxic bait Gelsura (containing the active ingredient alphacypermethrin) were classified as harmful (class 4) to D. areolatus (mortality > 85% at 96 HAE). In contrast, for toxic baits formulated with insecticide phosmet, the mortality ranged from 38% to 72%, classified as slightly harmful or moderately harmful. However, when phosmet was added to the 3% Samaritá Tradicional bait, the mortality was only 3.9% (class 1—harmless), similar to the toxicity observed for the Success 0.02 CB ready-to-use bait (0.24 g a.i. spinosad/l) (<5% mortality). Although toxic baits were formulated with spinosyn-based insecticides, all toxic bait formulations were classified as harmless or slightly harmful (<50% mortality) to D. areolatus, with the exception of 1.5% Ceratrap + spinetoram and 7% Sugarcane molasses + spinosad (≈ 60% mortality—moderately harmful). In addition, these formulations did not show sublethal effects in reducing the parasitism and emergence rate of the F1 generation of D. areolatus in A. fraterculus larvae. The results serve as a basis for the correct use of toxic food baits without affecting the biological control.
650 $aDoryctobracon areolatus
650 $aMosca das Frutas
700 1 $aCONTRERAS MIRANDA, J. A.
700 1 $aGONÇALVES, R. da S.
700 1 $aNÖRNBERG, S. D.
700 1 $aBERNARDI, D.
700 1 $aBOTTON, M.
700 1 $aNAVA, D. E.
773 $tJournal of Economic Entomology$gv. 116, n. 3, p. 855-863, Jun. 2023.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Uva e Vinho (CNPUV) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
| Nenhum registro encontrado para a expressão de busca informada. |
|
|
