|
Registro Completo |
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Gado de Leite. |
|
Data corrente: |
19/09/2025 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
19/09/2025 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
|
Autoria: |
BENÍCIO, R. M. A.; CORREIA, L. M.; MAGALHÃES, C. M. de C.; TINTINO, S. R.; OLIVEIRA FILHO, J. R. de; TONUCCI, R. G.; SILVA, L. V. A. da; OLIVEIRA, T. M. B. F.; CALIXTO JUNIOR, J. T. |
|
Afiliação: |
ROBERTA MARIA ARRAIS BENÍCIO, UNIVERSIDADE REGIONAL DO CARIRI; LEANDRO MARQUES CORREIA, UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DO CARIRI; CARLOS EMANUEL DE CARVALHO MAGALHÃES, UNIVERSIDADE ESTADUAL DO CEARA; SAULO RELISON TINTINO, UNIVERSIDADE REGIONAL DO CARIRI; JUVÊNCIO RODRIGUES DE OLIVEIRA FILHO, UNIVERSIDADE ESTADUAL DO CEARA; RAFAEL GONCALVES TONUCCI, CNPGL; LEONARDO VITOR ALVES DA SILVA, UNIVERSIDADE REGIONAL DO CARIRI; THIAGO MIELLE BRITO FERREIRA OLIVEIRA, UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DO CARIRI; JOAO TAVARES CALIXTO JUNIOR, UNIVERSIDADE REGIONAL DO CARIRI. |
|
Título: |
Comparing dry and wet chemical techniques for carbon stock assessment in senescent litter. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2025 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Environmental Geotechnics, 2025. |
|
DOI: |
https://doi.org/10.1680/jenge.25.00034 |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Notas: |
First online. ODS 13. |
|
Conteúdo: |
Accurate quantification of carbon stocks in ecosystems is essential for effective climate change mitigation. This study evaluates three common methods for measuring carbon content in senescent litter to identify the most reliable and practical approach: wet combustion (Walkley–Black (WB)) and two forms of dry combustion (muffle furnace incineration (MUFLA) and elemental analysis (CNHS)). For this purpose, monthly litter samples (leaves, branches, and miscellaneous) were collected over a year in a moist forest refuge in Chapada do Araripe, Brazil. Statistical variance analysis revealed significant differences among methods, with dry combustion techniques consistently yielding higher carbon values (MUFLA > CNHS > WB). The WB method also produced less reliable results and still requires hazardous chemicals for analysis, making its replacement by dry combustion preferable. Given its simplicity, safety, and effectiveness, MUFLA may be the most appropriate method for researchers assessing carbon stocks in senescent litter to estimate CO2 sequestration rates and support climate mitigation strategies. |
|
Thesagro: |
Carbono; Dióxido de Carbono; Mudança Climática; Serapilheira. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
P Recursos Naturais, Ciências Ambientais e da Terra |
|
Marc: |
LEADER 01998naa a2200289 a 4500
001 2178932
005 2025-09-19
008 2025 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
024 7 $ahttps://doi.org/10.1680/jenge.25.00034$2DOI
100 1 $aBENÍCIO, R. M. A.
245 $aComparing dry and wet chemical techniques for carbon stock assessment in senescent litter.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2025
500 $aFirst online. ODS 13.
520 $aAccurate quantification of carbon stocks in ecosystems is essential for effective climate change mitigation. This study evaluates three common methods for measuring carbon content in senescent litter to identify the most reliable and practical approach: wet combustion (Walkley–Black (WB)) and two forms of dry combustion (muffle furnace incineration (MUFLA) and elemental analysis (CNHS)). For this purpose, monthly litter samples (leaves, branches, and miscellaneous) were collected over a year in a moist forest refuge in Chapada do Araripe, Brazil. Statistical variance analysis revealed significant differences among methods, with dry combustion techniques consistently yielding higher carbon values (MUFLA > CNHS > WB). The WB method also produced less reliable results and still requires hazardous chemicals for analysis, making its replacement by dry combustion preferable. Given its simplicity, safety, and effectiveness, MUFLA may be the most appropriate method for researchers assessing carbon stocks in senescent litter to estimate CO2 sequestration rates and support climate mitigation strategies.
650 $aCarbono
650 $aDióxido de Carbono
650 $aMudança Climática
650 $aSerapilheira
700 1 $aCORREIA, L. M.
700 1 $aMAGALHÃES, C. M. de C.
700 1 $aTINTINO, S. R.
700 1 $aOLIVEIRA FILHO, J. R. de
700 1 $aTONUCCI, R. G.
700 1 $aSILVA, L. V. A. da
700 1 $aOLIVEIRA, T. M. B. F.
700 1 $aCALIXTO JUNIOR, J. T.
773 $tEnvironmental Geotechnics, 2025.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Gado de Leite (CNPGL) |
|
