| |
|
|
 | Acesso ao texto completo restrito à biblioteca da Embrapa Florestas. Para informações adicionais entre em contato com cnpf.biblioteca@embrapa.br. |
|
Registro Completo |
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Florestas; Embrapa Instrumentação. |
|
Data corrente: |
15/12/2023 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
19/02/2024 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
|
Autoria: |
COSTA, B. R. S.; OLDONI, H.; SILVA, T. M. M. da; FARINASSI. L. G.; BOGNOLA, I. A.; BASSOI, L. H. |
|
Afiliação: |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp); Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp); Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp); Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp); ITAMAR ANTONIO BOGNOLA, CNPF; LUIS HENRIQUE BASSOI, CNPDIA. |
|
Título: |
How similar is the zoning of different vegetation indices: Defining the optimal framework for monitoring grapevines’ growth within vigorous vineyards. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2023 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Scientia Horticulturae, v. 322, 112404, p. 1-17, 2023. |
|
DOI: |
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2023.112404 |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
ABSTRACT The spatial patterns of grapevines’ vigor across vigorous vineyards were assessed through distinct vegetation indices (VI) for comparison purposes. This survey also aids the selection of the most sensitive VI to monitor the vineyards during a given optimal stage of the last period of the growing season. The canopy reflectance (ρ) of grapevines cv. Cabernet Franc and Cabernet Sauvignon (Vitis vinifera L.) was measured throughout their berry development and ripening stages. Georeferenced data of ρ at the red (680 nm), red edge (730 nm), and nearinfrared (780 nm) wavebands were taken using a hand-held active sensor to compute the normalized difference red edge index (NDRE), and the normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI). Spatial predictions of both VI were estimated by geostatistical interpolation technique (kriging) and then categorized into homogeneous zones (HZ) through the Jenks natural breaks optimization method to delimit low and high vigor regions. Statistics of the inter-rater reliability between each VI zoning were calculated afterward. The relative dispersion of data around their mean was assumed as a criterion to assess the sensibility of each VI in detecting vigor variability under a given condition. The most appropriate stage to monitor the vineyards was determined based on the peak of vegetative growth inferred from the values of the VI we presumed as most sensitive. Differences between the HZ defined from the best combination of VI and stage in terms of yield, cane weight, and crop load were also examined. We demonstrated that NDRE was more sensitive than NDVI in detecting the vigor variability of high-density vegetation due to the relative dispersion of its datasets and the saturation effect of NDVI at the late stages of the grapevine growing season. The lowest and higher agreement between the VI zoning was usually detected at the berry touch and berry softening growth stages, respectively. Although there were distinct levels of concordance between NDRE and NDVI maps, their overall agreement was higher than 70% in most surveys. The disagreement in quantity or spatial allocation of vigor categories provided by each VI relied on the vineyard, growth stage, and growing season. Nevertheless, the early definition of HZ from NDRE monitoring carried out at veraison could be suitable to identify differences in cane weight at pruning, with a moderate effect size. MenosABSTRACT The spatial patterns of grapevines’ vigor across vigorous vineyards were assessed through distinct vegetation indices (VI) for comparison purposes. This survey also aids the selection of the most sensitive VI to monitor the vineyards during a given optimal stage of the last period of the growing season. The canopy reflectance (ρ) of grapevines cv. Cabernet Franc and Cabernet Sauvignon (Vitis vinifera L.) was measured throughout their berry development and ripening stages. Georeferenced data of ρ at the red (680 nm), red edge (730 nm), and nearinfrared (780 nm) wavebands were taken using a hand-held active sensor to compute the normalized difference red edge index (NDRE), and the normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI). Spatial predictions of both VI were estimated by geostatistical interpolation technique (kriging) and then categorized into homogeneous zones (HZ) through the Jenks natural breaks optimization method to delimit low and high vigor regions. Statistics of the inter-rater reliability between each VI zoning were calculated afterward. The relative dispersion of data around their mean was assumed as a criterion to assess the sensibility of each VI in detecting vigor variability under a given condition. The most appropriate stage to monitor the vineyards was determined based on the peak of vegetative growth inferred from the values of the VI we presumed as most sensitive. Differences between the HZ defined from the best combination of VI and stage in te... Mostrar Tudo |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Grapevine vigor; Map comparison; Mapas; Precision viticulture; Videira; Viticultura de precisão; Vitis vinifera L. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
--
K Ciência Florestal e Produtos de Origem Vegetal |
|
Marc: |
LEADER 03328naa a2200277 a 4500
001 2159824
005 2024-02-19
008 2023 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
024 7 $ahttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2023.112404$2DOI
100 1 $aCOSTA, B. R. S.
245 $aHow similar is the zoning of different vegetation indices$bDefining the optimal framework for monitoring grapevines’ growth within vigorous vineyards.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2023
520 $aABSTRACT The spatial patterns of grapevines’ vigor across vigorous vineyards were assessed through distinct vegetation indices (VI) for comparison purposes. This survey also aids the selection of the most sensitive VI to monitor the vineyards during a given optimal stage of the last period of the growing season. The canopy reflectance (ρ) of grapevines cv. Cabernet Franc and Cabernet Sauvignon (Vitis vinifera L.) was measured throughout their berry development and ripening stages. Georeferenced data of ρ at the red (680 nm), red edge (730 nm), and nearinfrared (780 nm) wavebands were taken using a hand-held active sensor to compute the normalized difference red edge index (NDRE), and the normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI). Spatial predictions of both VI were estimated by geostatistical interpolation technique (kriging) and then categorized into homogeneous zones (HZ) through the Jenks natural breaks optimization method to delimit low and high vigor regions. Statistics of the inter-rater reliability between each VI zoning were calculated afterward. The relative dispersion of data around their mean was assumed as a criterion to assess the sensibility of each VI in detecting vigor variability under a given condition. The most appropriate stage to monitor the vineyards was determined based on the peak of vegetative growth inferred from the values of the VI we presumed as most sensitive. Differences between the HZ defined from the best combination of VI and stage in terms of yield, cane weight, and crop load were also examined. We demonstrated that NDRE was more sensitive than NDVI in detecting the vigor variability of high-density vegetation due to the relative dispersion of its datasets and the saturation effect of NDVI at the late stages of the grapevine growing season. The lowest and higher agreement between the VI zoning was usually detected at the berry touch and berry softening growth stages, respectively. Although there were distinct levels of concordance between NDRE and NDVI maps, their overall agreement was higher than 70% in most surveys. The disagreement in quantity or spatial allocation of vigor categories provided by each VI relied on the vineyard, growth stage, and growing season. Nevertheless, the early definition of HZ from NDRE monitoring carried out at veraison could be suitable to identify differences in cane weight at pruning, with a moderate effect size.
653 $aGrapevine vigor
653 $aMap comparison
653 $aMapas
653 $aPrecision viticulture
653 $aVideira
653 $aViticultura de precisão
653 $aVitis vinifera L
700 1 $aOLDONI, H.
700 1 $aSILVA, T. M. M. da
700 1 $aFARINASSI. L. G.
700 1 $aBOGNOLA, I. A.
700 1 $aBASSOI, L. H.
773 $tScientia Horticulturae$gv. 322, 112404, p. 1-17, 2023.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Florestas (CNPF) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
URL |
Voltar
|
|
|
| Registros recuperados : 20 | |
| 8. |  | ASSIS, T. F. de; HIGA, A. R.; ROSA, O. P.; BAVER, J. F. Propagação vegetativa da Acácia negra (Acacia mearnsii). In: CONGRESSO FLORESTAL PANAMERICANO, 1.; CONGRESSO FLORESTAL BRASILEIRO, 7., 1993, Curitiba. Floresta para o Desenvolvimento: Política, Ambiente, Tecnologia e Mercado: anais. São Paulo: SBS; [S.l.]: SBEF, 1993. v. 1, p. 150-152.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Florestas. |
|    |
| 14. | | RESENDE, M. D. V. de; ASSIS, T. F. de; GRATTAPAGLIA, D.; PIRES, I. E. Genética e melhoramento do eucalipto. In: VALE, A. B. do; MACHADO, C. C.; PIRES, J. M. M.; VILAR, M. B.; COSTA, C. B.; NACIF, A. de P. (Ed.). Eucaliptocultura no Brasil: silvicultura, manejo e ambiência. Viçosa, MG: SIF, 2014. p. 103-119.| Tipo: Capítulo em Livro Técnico-Científico |
| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Florestas; Embrapa Recursos Genéticos e Biotecnologia. |
|  |
| 17. | | SANTOS, G. A. dos; NUNES, A. C. P.; RESENDE, M. D. V. de; SILVA, L. D.; HIGA, A.; ASSIS, T. F. de. An index combining volume and Pilodyn penetration to study stability and adaptability of Eucalyptus multi-species hybrids in Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. Australian Forestry,v. 79, n. 4, p. 248-255, 2016.| Tipo: Artigo em Periódico Indexado | Circulação/Nível: B - 1 |
| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Florestas. |
| |
| 19. | | NUNES, A. C. P.; SANTOS, G. A. dos; RESENDE, M. D. V. de; SILVA, L. D.; HIGA, A.; ASSIS, T. F. de. Qualidade da madeira e seleção indireta: estabelecimento de "zonas de melhoramento" de Eucalyptus no Estado do Rio Grande do Sul. In: CONGRESSO BRASILEIRO DE MELHORAMENTO DE PLANTAS, 8., 2015, Goiânia. O melhoramento de plantas, o futuro da agricultura e a soberania nacional: anais. Goiânia: SBMP: UFG, 2015. Resumo.| Tipo: Resumo em Anais de Congresso |
| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Florestas. |
| |
| 20. | | FONTANA, A.; PIRES, A. M. M.; VENTURIERI, A.; JESUS, A. H. de; PAULA, A. J. de; MEDEIROS, A. de S.; VARGAS, A. de G.; BERNDT, A.; FERREIRA, A. L.; LUIZ, A. J. B.; ALVES, A. E.; PEREIRA, A. C.; FREITAS, A. F. de; PACKER, A. P.; CAVALCANTE, A. P. C. M.; FRASCA, A. V. da L.; FERNANDES, A.; ZIMBRES, B.; RUDORFF, B. F. T.; DENARDI, B. M.; BORDRON, B.; ALVES, B. J. R.; KRAHEMBUHL, C. B. B. P.; ARAÚJO, C. E. R.; DUBEUX, C. B. S; MAEQUES, C. L.; SILVA, C. R.; BALDI, C.; JANTALIA, C. P.; GESTEIRA NETO, C. J. M.; BACK, C. D.; ANDRADE, C. A. de; AGUIAR, D. A. de; OBERLING, D. F.; OLIVEIRA, D. M. de; CALÇADO, D. M.; GONÇALVES, D. N. S.; MOLLETA, D. G. S.; GAROFALO, D. F. T.; FERREIRA, D.; GOULART, D.; OLIVEIRA, E. C. de; ROSA, E. R.; ALMEIDA, E. G. de; ALBUQUERQUE, E. R. G. M. de; LA ROVERE, E. L.; RIEGELHAUPT, E. M.; HENRIQUE, F. L.; FARIA, F. F. de; PATERNOST, F. F.; CESÁRIO, F. V.; PEREIRA, F. R. de S.; PAREYN, F. G. C.; RODRIGUES, G. A. H.; BERTANI, G.; LEMOS, G. da S.; RIBEIRO, G. H. P. de M.; CABRAL, G. H.; FROES, G. A. M.; GOES, G. V.; ANDRADE, G. S. de; CARVALHO, G. C. de; NASPOLINI, G. F.; CHRISTO, G. L. de; SANTOS, G. V. dos; BARROS, H. H. D. de; HASENACK, H.; TAVARES, H. C.; MARTINS, I. T.; FRANÇA, I. E. R.; ROITMAN, I.; SOARES, I. M. de M.; SIMIONATO, J.; FREITAS, J.; OMETTO, J. P. H. B.; LINARES, J. A. H.; RISSO, J.; CRUZ FILHO, J. L. V. da; QUINTÃO, J. M. B.; SILVA, J. S. O.; LANA, J. T. de O.; ZANATTA, J. A.; MARACAHIPES, L.; RIBEIRO, L. da S.; VICENTE, L. E.; SCHRAMM, L. F. P.; ROSSI, L. M. B.; SILVA, M. G. da; SARAIVA, M.; D'AGOSTO, M. de A.; VIRTUOSO, M. A.; LIGO, M. A. V.; RACHWAL, M. F. G.; ROSA, M.; PICHARILLO, M. E.; SILVA, M. G. L. da; MATSUURA, M. I. da S. F.; DALLA BETTA, M. M.; PEREIRA, M. J.; CARON, M. L.; ASSIS, M. L. R. de; SANTOS, M. M. de O.; ROCHA, M. B.; BUSTAMANTE, M. M. da C.; WALTER, M. C.; AQUINO, M. F. S. de; SALGADO, M. P. G.; SERRUYA, N. M.; MOREIRA, N. de P.; FERREIRA, N. C.; RAMOS, N. P.; CABRAL, O. M. R.; MOSER, P.; COLTURATO, P. D.; GRÜTZMACHER, P.; AUGUSTO, R. C.; GRISOLI, R. P. S.; SOLARI, R.; PAZIANOTTO, R. A. A.; DUPONT, R. A. B.; CANTINHO, R. Z.; PEIXOTO, R. de A.; PADILHA, R. A.; NICOLOSO, R. da S.; OLIVEIRA, R. R. S. de; HIGA, R. C. V.; GUIDOTTI, R. M. M.; NOGUEIRA, S. F.; MAIA, S. M. F.; ASSIS, T. F. de; IGAWA, T. K.; RODRIGUES, T. da S.; CARMO, T. R. L. do; MIRANDA, V. S.; KONDO, V. Y.; SCIVITTARO, W. B.; WILLS, W.; HOLLER, W. A. Inventário nacional de emissões e remoções antrópicas de gases de efeito estufa. In: BRASIL. Ministério da Ciência, Tecnologia e Inovações. Quarta Comunicação Nacional do Brasil à Convenção-Quadro das Nações Unidas sobre Mudança do Clima. Brasília, DF, 2021. cap. 2, p. 80-181.| Tipo: Capítulo em Livro Técnico-Científico |
| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Agrobiologia; Embrapa Amazônia Oriental; Embrapa Florestas; Embrapa Pecuária Sudeste; Embrapa Solos. |
| |
| Registros recuperados : 20 | |
|
| Expressão de busca inválida. Verifique!!! |
|
|
