|
|
 | Acesso ao texto completo restrito à biblioteca da Embrapa Mandioca e Fruticultura. Para informações adicionais entre em contato com cnpmf.biblioteca@embrapa.br. |
Registro Completo |
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Mandioca e Fruticultura. |
Data corrente: |
26/02/2010 |
Data da última atualização: |
22/08/2022 |
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
Autoria: |
BANI HASHEMIAN, S. M.; BARBOSA, C. de J.; SERRA, P.; DURAN-VILA, N. |
Afiliação: |
Seyed Mehdi Bani Hashemian, IVIA; CRISTIANE DE JESUS BARBOSA, CNPMF; Pedro Serra, IVIA; Núria Duran-Vila, IVIA. |
Título: |
Effects of resistance of Eremocitrus glauca and Microcitrus australis to viroid infection: replication, accumulation and long-distance movement of six citrus viroids. |
Ano de publicação: |
2010 |
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Plant Pathology, London, p. 1-9, fev. 2010. Early View. |
DOI: |
10.1111/j.1365-3059.2009.02234.x |
Idioma: |
Português |
Conteúdo: |
In studies to identify genotypes resistant to infection with citrus viroids, Eremocitrus glauca and Microcitrus australis were selected because their evolution in their habitat in Australia and New Guinea may have led to the selection of unusual traits. The movement and accumulation of Citrus exocortis viroid (CEVd), Hop stunt viroid, Citrus bent leaf viroid, Citrus dwarfing viroid, Citrus bark cracking viroid and Citrus viroid V (CVd-V) in self-rooted as well as in graft- propagated E. glauca and M. australis plants was assessed by northern hybridization, RT-PCR and by topworking to the sensitive selection 861- S1 of Etrog citron. In both plant species the inoculated viroids were undetectable unless these plants were grafted to a susceptible Citrus partner, the rough lemon rootstock and/ or the topworked Etrog citron, which acted as viroid sources. The results obtained indicate that M. australis and in particular E. glauca are poor viroid hosts in which viroid replication /accumulation does not occur or is extremely inefficient. However, viroid downward and upward movement to grafted Citrus partners in which viroid replication and accumulation occurs efficiently was not impaired. Eremocitrus glauca and M. australis showed differences regarding their properties as viroid hosts, but for both species CEVd seemed to have the lowest affinity among the viroid species tested and CVd-V the highest. Even though E. glauca and M. australis do not appear to be truly resistant to viroid infection, they are interesting genotypes for further characterization of the mechanisms involved in viroid infection. MenosIn studies to identify genotypes resistant to infection with citrus viroids, Eremocitrus glauca and Microcitrus australis were selected because their evolution in their habitat in Australia and New Guinea may have led to the selection of unusual traits. The movement and accumulation of Citrus exocortis viroid (CEVd), Hop stunt viroid, Citrus bent leaf viroid, Citrus dwarfing viroid, Citrus bark cracking viroid and Citrus viroid V (CVd-V) in self-rooted as well as in graft- propagated E. glauca and M. australis plants was assessed by northern hybridization, RT-PCR and by topworking to the sensitive selection 861- S1 of Etrog citron. In both plant species the inoculated viroids were undetectable unless these plants were grafted to a susceptible Citrus partner, the rough lemon rootstock and/ or the topworked Etrog citron, which acted as viroid sources. The results obtained indicate that M. australis and in particular E. glauca are poor viroid hosts in which viroid replication /accumulation does not occur or is extremely inefficient. However, viroid downward and upward movement to grafted Citrus partners in which viroid replication and accumulation occurs efficiently was not impaired. Eremocitrus glauca and M. australis showed differences regarding their properties as viroid hosts, but for both species CEVd seemed to have the lowest affinity among the viroid species tested and CVd-V the highest. Even though E. glauca and M. australis do not appear to be truly resistant to viroid... Mostrar Tudo |
Palavras-Chave: |
Citrus brak craking viroid; Citrus dwarfing viroid; Citrus viroid V. |
Thesaurus Nal: |
Citrus bent leaf viroid; Citrus exocortis viroid; Hop stunt viroid. |
Categoria do assunto: |
G Melhoramento Genético |
Marc: |
LEADER 02466naa a2200241 a 4500 001 1659110 005 2022-08-22 008 2010 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d 024 7 $a10.1111/j.1365-3059.2009.02234.x$2DOI 100 1 $aBANI HASHEMIAN, S. M. 245 $aEffects of resistance of Eremocitrus glauca and Microcitrus australis to viroid infection$breplication, accumulation and long-distance movement of six citrus viroids.$h[electronic resource] 260 $c2010 520 $aIn studies to identify genotypes resistant to infection with citrus viroids, Eremocitrus glauca and Microcitrus australis were selected because their evolution in their habitat in Australia and New Guinea may have led to the selection of unusual traits. The movement and accumulation of Citrus exocortis viroid (CEVd), Hop stunt viroid, Citrus bent leaf viroid, Citrus dwarfing viroid, Citrus bark cracking viroid and Citrus viroid V (CVd-V) in self-rooted as well as in graft- propagated E. glauca and M. australis plants was assessed by northern hybridization, RT-PCR and by topworking to the sensitive selection 861- S1 of Etrog citron. In both plant species the inoculated viroids were undetectable unless these plants were grafted to a susceptible Citrus partner, the rough lemon rootstock and/ or the topworked Etrog citron, which acted as viroid sources. The results obtained indicate that M. australis and in particular E. glauca are poor viroid hosts in which viroid replication /accumulation does not occur or is extremely inefficient. However, viroid downward and upward movement to grafted Citrus partners in which viroid replication and accumulation occurs efficiently was not impaired. Eremocitrus glauca and M. australis showed differences regarding their properties as viroid hosts, but for both species CEVd seemed to have the lowest affinity among the viroid species tested and CVd-V the highest. Even though E. glauca and M. australis do not appear to be truly resistant to viroid infection, they are interesting genotypes for further characterization of the mechanisms involved in viroid infection. 650 $aCitrus bent leaf viroid 650 $aCitrus exocortis viroid 650 $aHop stunt viroid 653 $aCitrus brak craking viroid 653 $aCitrus dwarfing viroid 653 $aCitrus viroid V 700 1 $aBARBOSA, C. de J. 700 1 $aSERRA, P. 700 1 $aDURAN-VILA, N. 773 $tPlant Pathology, London, p. 1-9, fev. 2010. Early View.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
Registro original: |
Embrapa Mandioca e Fruticultura (CNPMF) |
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
URL |
Voltar
|
|
Registros recuperados : 3 | |
1. |  | OLIVEIRA, A. M. G.; DITA RODRÍGUEZ, M. A.; DINIZ, M. de S.; OLIVEIRA, J. L. de; MAIA, L. E. do N.; LAGO, R. R. Podridão radicular em variedades de mandioca cultivadas em Porto Seguro-BA. In: CONGRESSO BRASILEIRO DA MANDIOCA, 12., 2007, Paranavaí. Mandioca: bioenergia, alimento e renda. Botucatu: CERAT- UNESP, [2007].Tipo: Artigo em Anais de Congresso / Nota Técnica |
Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Mandioca e Fruticultura. |
|    |
Registros recuperados : 3 | |
|
Nenhum registro encontrado para a expressão de busca informada. |
|
|