| |
|
|
 | Acesso ao texto completo restrito à biblioteca da Embrapa Mandioca e Fruticultura. Para informações adicionais entre em contato com cnpmf.biblioteca@embrapa.br. |
|
Registro Completo |
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Mandioca e Fruticultura. |
|
Data corrente: |
20/09/2018 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
20/09/2018 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
|
Autoria: |
FREITAS, J. P. X. de; DINIZ, R. P.; SANTOS, V. da S.; OLIVEIRA, E. J. de. |
|
Afiliação: |
JUAN PAULO XAVIER DE FREITAS, UFRB; RAFAEL PARREIRA DINIZ, UFRB; VANDERLEI DA SILVA SANTOS, CNPMF; EDER JORGE DE OLIVEIRA, CNPMF. |
|
Título: |
Genetic parameters and selection gains in early clonal evaluation trials: implications for cassava breeding. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2018 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Euphytica, v.214, p.127, 2018. |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
The objective of this study was to estimate and compare genetic parameters in early cassava breeding phases (clonal evaluation trials?CET and preliminary yield trials?PYT) in full-sib (F1) and self-pollinated (S1) families, besides estimating the genetic gains. Twenty-three F1 and six S1 families were evaluated using the augmented block design in CET and the randomized complete block design in PYT for fresh root yield (FRY), root dry matter content (DMC) and starch yield (STY). In CET, most of the variance was due to environmental (\sigma_{e}^{2}) followed by variance within F1 and S1 (\sigma_{Clone/Fam}^{2}) families, with the exception of DMC in S1 families. PYT presented the opposite behavior. In contrast, specifically for S1 families, the variance between families (\sigma_{ Fam}^{2}) was more important than \sigma_{e}^{2} and \sigma_{Clone/Fam}^{2} in PYT. The heritability of families (h_{Fam}^{2}) was lower than individual broad-sense heritability (h_{g}^{2}) in all trials and families. Regardless of the family type and trial, family accuracy (r_{ggFam}) was lower than the clone accuracies (r_{ggCl}). Predicted gains using the selection index (SI) applied to best linear unbiased prediction (BLUP) were higher in PYT compared with CET and higher in F1 families in comparison with S1. There was also low coincidence in clone selection in both trials (30 and 45% for F1 and S1 families, respectively). For cassava breeding, it is recommended to obtain a higher number of clones per family and to use the SI with moderate intensity, particularly in CET. MenosThe objective of this study was to estimate and compare genetic parameters in early cassava breeding phases (clonal evaluation trials?CET and preliminary yield trials?PYT) in full-sib (F1) and self-pollinated (S1) families, besides estimating the genetic gains. Twenty-three F1 and six S1 families were evaluated using the augmented block design in CET and the randomized complete block design in PYT for fresh root yield (FRY), root dry matter content (DMC) and starch yield (STY). In CET, most of the variance was due to environmental (\sigma_{e}^{2}) followed by variance within F1 and S1 (\sigma_{Clone/Fam}^{2}) families, with the exception of DMC in S1 families. PYT presented the opposite behavior. In contrast, specifically for S1 families, the variance between families (\sigma_{ Fam}^{2}) was more important than \sigma_{e}^{2} and \sigma_{Clone/Fam}^{2} in PYT. The heritability of families (h_{Fam}^{2}) was lower than individual broad-sense heritability (h_{g}^{2}) in all trials and families. Regardless of the family type and trial, family accuracy (r_{ggFam}) was lower than the clone accuracies (r_{ggCl}). Predicted gains using the selection index (SI) applied to best linear unbiased prediction (BLUP) were higher in PYT compared with CET and higher in F1 families in comparison with S1. There was also low coincidence in clone selection in both trials (30 and 45% for F1 and S1 families, respectively). For cassava breeding, it is recommended to obtain a higher number of clones ... Mostrar Tudo |
|
Thesagro: |
Mandioca; Manihot Esculenta; Melhoramento Vegetal. |
|
Thesaurus Nal: |
Breeding; Cassava. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
-- |
|
Marc: |
LEADER 02207naa a2200217 a 4500
001 2096095
005 2018-09-20
008 2018 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
100 1 $aFREITAS, J. P. X. de
245 $aGenetic parameters and selection gains in early clonal evaluation trials$bimplications for cassava breeding.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2018
520 $aThe objective of this study was to estimate and compare genetic parameters in early cassava breeding phases (clonal evaluation trials?CET and preliminary yield trials?PYT) in full-sib (F1) and self-pollinated (S1) families, besides estimating the genetic gains. Twenty-three F1 and six S1 families were evaluated using the augmented block design in CET and the randomized complete block design in PYT for fresh root yield (FRY), root dry matter content (DMC) and starch yield (STY). In CET, most of the variance was due to environmental (\sigma_{e}^{2}) followed by variance within F1 and S1 (\sigma_{Clone/Fam}^{2}) families, with the exception of DMC in S1 families. PYT presented the opposite behavior. In contrast, specifically for S1 families, the variance between families (\sigma_{ Fam}^{2}) was more important than \sigma_{e}^{2} and \sigma_{Clone/Fam}^{2} in PYT. The heritability of families (h_{Fam}^{2}) was lower than individual broad-sense heritability (h_{g}^{2}) in all trials and families. Regardless of the family type and trial, family accuracy (r_{ggFam}) was lower than the clone accuracies (r_{ggCl}). Predicted gains using the selection index (SI) applied to best linear unbiased prediction (BLUP) were higher in PYT compared with CET and higher in F1 families in comparison with S1. There was also low coincidence in clone selection in both trials (30 and 45% for F1 and S1 families, respectively). For cassava breeding, it is recommended to obtain a higher number of clones per family and to use the SI with moderate intensity, particularly in CET.
650 $aBreeding
650 $aCassava
650 $aMandioca
650 $aManihot Esculenta
650 $aMelhoramento Vegetal
700 1 $aDINIZ, R. P.
700 1 $aSANTOS, V. da S.
700 1 $aOLIVEIRA, E. J. de
773 $tEuphytica$gv.214, p.127, 2018.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Mandioca e Fruticultura (CNPMF) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
URL |
Voltar
|
|
|
| Registros recuperados : 1 | |
| Registros recuperados : 1 | |
|
| Nenhum registro encontrado para a expressão de busca informada. |
|
|
