|
|
Registro Completo |
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Mandioca e Fruticultura. |
Data corrente: |
31/08/2011 |
Data da última atualização: |
18/10/2011 |
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Anais de Congresso |
Autoria: |
AMARAL, J. C. G. P.; RAMALHO, E. V. B. M.; SILVA, R. A. da; ALMEIDA, F. N. de; SOUZA, F. V. D.; FERREIRA, C. F. |
Afiliação: |
JÉSSICA CRISTINE GUIMARÃES PASSOS AMARAL, UFRB; EDÍMILLE VÍVIAN BATISTA MENEZES RAMALHO, UFRB; RANGELINE AZEVEDO da SILVA, UFRB; FRANCIELLE NUNES de ALMEIDA, UFRB; FERNANDA VIDIGAL DUARTE SOUZA, CNPMF; CLAUDIA FORTES FERREIRA, CNPMF. |
Título: |
Caracterização molecular de abacaxizeiro visando o desenvolvimento de produtos tecnológicos biodegradáveis. |
Ano de publicação: |
2011 |
Fonte/Imprenta: |
In: CONGRESSO BRASILEIRO DE MELHORAMENTO DE PLANTAS, 6., 2011, Búzios. Panorama atual e perspectivas do melhoramento de plantas no Brasil: [anais]. Búzios: Sociedade Brasileira de Melhoramento de Plantas, 2011. 1 CD ROM. |
Páginas: |
4 p. |
Idioma: |
Português |
Conteúdo: |
As fibras naturais têm emergido como uma alternativa de baixo custo, pouco peso e com um apelo ambiental superior a outros materiais usados na indústria, substituindo, principalmente as fibras de vidro e gerando um impacto ambiental significativamente menor. O objetivo to presente trabalho foi avaliar a variabilidade genética entre 23 acessos de abacaxizeiro, pertencentes ao BAG-Abacaxi da Embrapa-CNPMF, contrastantes para a característica de textura de fibra ,utilizando marcador molecular do tipo ISSR (Inter-Simple Sequence Repeats). A menor distância entre os acessos foi de 0,29 entre os acessos BGA690 e BGA119 e a maior, 0,95, entre os acessos BGA83 e BGA25 e entre HB750 x 128 e BGA83. Os marcadores ISSRs foram eficientes em separar os acessos quanto à textura da coroa. Portanto, existe variabilidade genética entre os acessos avaliados, o que demonstra o grande potencial deste germoplasma para uso no melhoramento genético. |
Palavras-Chave: |
Melhoramento genético. |
Thesagro: |
Abacaxi. |
Thesaurus Nal: |
Ananas. |
Categoria do assunto: |
G Melhoramento Genético |
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/item/42629/1/3434.pdf
|
Marc: |
LEADER 01769nam a2200217 a 4500 001 1899277 005 2011-10-18 008 2011 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d 100 1 $aAMARAL, J. C. G. P. 245 $aCaracterização molecular de abacaxizeiro visando o desenvolvimento de produtos tecnológicos biodegradáveis. 260 $aIn: CONGRESSO BRASILEIRO DE MELHORAMENTO DE PLANTAS, 6., 2011, Búzios. Panorama atual e perspectivas do melhoramento de plantas no Brasil: [anais]. Búzios: Sociedade Brasileira de Melhoramento de Plantas, 2011. 1 CD ROM.$c2011 300 $a4 p. 520 $aAs fibras naturais têm emergido como uma alternativa de baixo custo, pouco peso e com um apelo ambiental superior a outros materiais usados na indústria, substituindo, principalmente as fibras de vidro e gerando um impacto ambiental significativamente menor. O objetivo to presente trabalho foi avaliar a variabilidade genética entre 23 acessos de abacaxizeiro, pertencentes ao BAG-Abacaxi da Embrapa-CNPMF, contrastantes para a característica de textura de fibra ,utilizando marcador molecular do tipo ISSR (Inter-Simple Sequence Repeats). A menor distância entre os acessos foi de 0,29 entre os acessos BGA690 e BGA119 e a maior, 0,95, entre os acessos BGA83 e BGA25 e entre HB750 x 128 e BGA83. Os marcadores ISSRs foram eficientes em separar os acessos quanto à textura da coroa. Portanto, existe variabilidade genética entre os acessos avaliados, o que demonstra o grande potencial deste germoplasma para uso no melhoramento genético. 650 $aAnanas 650 $aAbacaxi 653 $aMelhoramento genético 700 1 $aRAMALHO, E. V. B. M. 700 1 $aSILVA, R. A. da 700 1 $aALMEIDA, F. N. de 700 1 $aSOUZA, F. V. D. 700 1 $aFERREIRA, C. F.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
Registro original: |
Embrapa Mandioca e Fruticultura (CNPMF) |
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
URL |
Voltar
|
|
| Acesso ao texto completo restrito à biblioteca da Embrapa Agrobiologia. Para informações adicionais entre em contato com cnpab.biblioteca@embrapa.br. |
Registro Completo
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Agrobiologia. |
Data corrente: |
01/03/2021 |
Data da última atualização: |
11/11/2022 |
Tipo da produção científica: |
Capítulo em Livro Técnico-Científico |
Autoria: |
ZAMAN, M.; KLEINEIDAM, K.; BAKKEN, L.; BERENDT, J.; BRACKEN, C.; BUTTERBACH-BAHL, K.; CAI, Z.; CHANG, S. X.; CLOUGH, T.; DAWAR, K.; DING, W. X.; DÖRSCH, P.; MARTINS, M. dos R.; ECKHARDT, C.; FIEDLER, T.; FROSCH, T.; GOOPY, J.; GORRES, C. M.; GUPTA, A.; HENJES, S.; HOFMMAN, M. E. G.; HORN, M. A.; JAHANGIR, M. M. R.; JANSEN-WILLEMS, A.; LENHART, K.; HENG, L.; LEWICKA-SZCZEBAK, D.; LUCIC, G.; MERBOLD, L.; MOHN, J.; MOLSTAD, L.; MOSER, G.; MURPHY, P.; SANZ-COBENA, A.; SIMEK, M.; URQUIAGA, S.; WELL, R.; WRAGE-MÖNNIG, N.; ZAMAN, S.; SHANG, J.; MÜLLER, C. |
Afiliação: |
FAO IAEA Viena; Liebig University Giessen; Norwegian University; University of Rostock; University College Dublin; Karlsruhe Institute of Technology; Nanjing Normal University; University of Alberta; Lincoln University; University of Agriculture, Peshawar; Chinese Academy of Sciences; Norwegian University; UFRRJ; Liebig University Giessen; University of Rostock; Technical University Darmstadt; International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI), Nairobi; Hochschule Geisenheim University; Independent Consultant India; Leibniz University Hannover; Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands; Leibniz University Hannover; Bangladesh Agricultural University; Liebig University Giessen; Bingen University; FAO/IAEA; University of Wroc?aw; Picarro Inc. USA; International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI), Nairobi; Laboratory for Air Pollution and Environmental Technology, Empa Dübendorf; Norwegian University; Liebig University Giessen; University College, IR; Universidad Politécnica de Madrid; University of South Bohemia; SEGUNDO SACRAMENTO U CABALLERO, CNPAB; Thünen Institute of Climate-Smart Agriculture; University of Rostock; University of Canterbur; Nanjing Normal University; Liebig University Giessen. |
Título: |
Greenhouse gases from agriculture. |
Ano de publicação: |
2021 |
Fonte/Imprenta: |
In: ZAMAN, M.; HENG, L.; Müller, C. (Ed.). Measuring emission of agricultural greenhouse gases and developing mitigation options using nuclear and related techniques: applications of nuclear techniques for GHGs. London: Springer, 2021. Chapter 1. |
Páginas: |
p. 1-10 |
ISBN: |
978-3-030-55396-8 |
DOI: |
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-55396-8_1 |
Idioma: |
Inglês |
Conteúdo: |
The rapidly changing global climate due to increased emission of anthropogenic greenhouse gases (GHGs) is leading to an increased occurrence of extreme weather events such as droughts, floods, and heatwaves. The three major GHGs are carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), and nitrous oxide (N2O). The major natural sources of CO2 include ocean?atmosphere exchange, respiration of animals, soils (microbial respiration) and plants, and volcanic eruption; while the anthropogenic sources include burning of fossil fuel (coal, natural gas, and oil), deforestation, and the cultivation of land that increases the decomposition of soil organic matter and crop and animal residues. Natural sources of CH4 emission include wetlands, termite activities, and oceans. Paddy fields used for rice production, livestock production systems (enteric emission from ruminants), landfills, and the production and use of fossil fuels are the main anthropogenic sources of CH4. Nitrous oxide, in addition to being a major GHG, is also an ozone-depleting gas. N2O is emitted by natural processes from oceans and terrestrial ecosystems. Anthropogenic N2O emissions occur mostly through agricultural and other land-use activities and are associated with the intensification of agricultural and other human activities such as increased use of synthetic fertiliser (119.4 million tonnes of N worldwide in 2019), inefficient use of irrigation water, deposition of animal excreta (urine and dung) from grazing animals, excessive and inefficient application of farm effluents and animal manure to croplands and pastures, and management practices that enhance soil organic N mineralisation and C decomposition. Agriculture could act as a source and a sink of GHGs. Besides direct sources, GHGs also come from various indirect sources, including upstream and downstream emissions in agricultural systems and ammonia (NH3) deposition from fertiliser and animal manure. MenosThe rapidly changing global climate due to increased emission of anthropogenic greenhouse gases (GHGs) is leading to an increased occurrence of extreme weather events such as droughts, floods, and heatwaves. The three major GHGs are carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), and nitrous oxide (N2O). The major natural sources of CO2 include ocean?atmosphere exchange, respiration of animals, soils (microbial respiration) and plants, and volcanic eruption; while the anthropogenic sources include burning of fossil fuel (coal, natural gas, and oil), deforestation, and the cultivation of land that increases the decomposition of soil organic matter and crop and animal residues. Natural sources of CH4 emission include wetlands, termite activities, and oceans. Paddy fields used for rice production, livestock production systems (enteric emission from ruminants), landfills, and the production and use of fossil fuels are the main anthropogenic sources of CH4. Nitrous oxide, in addition to being a major GHG, is also an ozone-depleting gas. N2O is emitted by natural processes from oceans and terrestrial ecosystems. Anthropogenic N2O emissions occur mostly through agricultural and other land-use activities and are associated with the intensification of agricultural and other human activities such as increased use of synthetic fertiliser (119.4 million tonnes of N worldwide in 2019), inefficient use of irrigation water, deposition of animal excreta (urine and dung) from grazing animals, excessive... Mostrar Tudo |
Thesaurus NAL: |
Climate change; Greenhouse gas emissions. |
Categoria do assunto: |
P Recursos Naturais, Ciências Ambientais e da Terra |
Marc: |
LEADER 03804naa a2200661 a 4500 001 2130409 005 2022-11-11 008 2021 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d 020 $a978-3-030-55396-8 024 7 $ahttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-55396-8_1$2DOI 100 1 $aZAMAN, M. 245 $aGreenhouse gases from agriculture.$h[electronic resource] 260 $c2021 300 $ap. 1-10 520 $aThe rapidly changing global climate due to increased emission of anthropogenic greenhouse gases (GHGs) is leading to an increased occurrence of extreme weather events such as droughts, floods, and heatwaves. The three major GHGs are carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), and nitrous oxide (N2O). The major natural sources of CO2 include ocean?atmosphere exchange, respiration of animals, soils (microbial respiration) and plants, and volcanic eruption; while the anthropogenic sources include burning of fossil fuel (coal, natural gas, and oil), deforestation, and the cultivation of land that increases the decomposition of soil organic matter and crop and animal residues. Natural sources of CH4 emission include wetlands, termite activities, and oceans. Paddy fields used for rice production, livestock production systems (enteric emission from ruminants), landfills, and the production and use of fossil fuels are the main anthropogenic sources of CH4. Nitrous oxide, in addition to being a major GHG, is also an ozone-depleting gas. N2O is emitted by natural processes from oceans and terrestrial ecosystems. Anthropogenic N2O emissions occur mostly through agricultural and other land-use activities and are associated with the intensification of agricultural and other human activities such as increased use of synthetic fertiliser (119.4 million tonnes of N worldwide in 2019), inefficient use of irrigation water, deposition of animal excreta (urine and dung) from grazing animals, excessive and inefficient application of farm effluents and animal manure to croplands and pastures, and management practices that enhance soil organic N mineralisation and C decomposition. Agriculture could act as a source and a sink of GHGs. Besides direct sources, GHGs also come from various indirect sources, including upstream and downstream emissions in agricultural systems and ammonia (NH3) deposition from fertiliser and animal manure. 650 $aClimate change 650 $aGreenhouse gas emissions 700 1 $aKLEINEIDAM, K. 700 1 $aBAKKEN, L. 700 1 $aBERENDT, J. 700 1 $aBRACKEN, C. 700 1 $aBUTTERBACH-BAHL, K. 700 1 $aCAI, Z. 700 1 $aCHANG, S. X. 700 1 $aCLOUGH, T. 700 1 $aDAWAR, K. 700 1 $aDING, W. X. 700 1 $aDÖRSCH, P. 700 1 $aMARTINS, M. dos R. 700 1 $aECKHARDT, C. 700 1 $aFIEDLER, T. 700 1 $aFROSCH, T. 700 1 $aGOOPY, J. 700 1 $aGORRES, C. M. 700 1 $aGUPTA, A. 700 1 $aHENJES, S. 700 1 $aHOFMMAN, M. E. G. 700 1 $aHORN, M. A. 700 1 $aJAHANGIR, M. M. R. 700 1 $aJANSEN-WILLEMS, A. 700 1 $aLENHART, K. 700 1 $aHENG, L. 700 1 $aLEWICKA-SZCZEBAK, D. 700 1 $aLUCIC, G. 700 1 $aMERBOLD, L. 700 1 $aMOHN, J. 700 1 $aMOLSTAD, L. 700 1 $aMOSER, G. 700 1 $aMURPHY, P. 700 1 $aSANZ-COBENA, A. 700 1 $aSIMEK, M. 700 1 $aURQUIAGA, S. 700 1 $aWELL, R. 700 1 $aWRAGE-MÖNNIG, N. 700 1 $aZAMAN, S. 700 1 $aSHANG, J. 700 1 $aMÜLLER, C. 773 $tIn: ZAMAN, M.; HENG, L.; Müller, C. (Ed.). Measuring emission of agricultural greenhouse gases and developing mitigation options using nuclear and related techniques: applications of nuclear techniques for GHGs. London: Springer, 2021. Chapter 1.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
Registro original: |
Embrapa Agrobiologia (CNPAB) |
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
Expressão de busca inválida. Verifique!!! |
|
|