| |
|
|
 | Acesso ao texto completo restrito à biblioteca da Embrapa Florestas. Para informações adicionais entre em contato com cnpf.biblioteca@embrapa.br. |
|
Registro Completo |
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Florestas. |
|
Data corrente: |
19/01/2023 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
20/03/2024 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
|
Autoria: |
BOSCHIERO, B. N.; CASTRO, S. G. Q. de; CRUZ, L. P. da; CARVALHO, J. L. N.; SILVA, S. R.; BRESSIANI, J. A.; KÖLLN, O. T. |
|
Afiliação: |
BEATRIZ NASTARO BOSCHIERO, CENTRO NACIONAL DE PESQUISA EM ENERGIA E MATERIAIS; SÉRGIO GUSTAVO QUASSI DE CASTRO, AGROQUATRO-S EXPERIMENTAÇÃO AGRONÔMICA; LARISSA PRADO DA CRUZ, UNIVERSIDADE DE CAMPINAS; JOÃO LUIS NUNES CARVALHO, CENTRO NACIONAL DE PESQUISA EM ENERGIA E MATERIAIS; SERGIO RICARDO SILVA, CNPF; JOSÉ ANTONIO BRESSIANI, GRANBIO INVESTIMENTOS SA; ORIEL TIAGO KÖLLN, UNIVERSIDADE DO NORTE DO PARANÁ. |
|
Título: |
Biomass yield, nutrient removal, and chemical composition of energy cane genotypes in Southeast Brazil. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2023 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Industrial Crops and Products, v. 191, 115993, Jan. 2023. |
|
DOI: |
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2022.115993 |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
Sugarcane (Saccharum spp.) is the main feedstock for bioethanol production in Brazil. Recently, some breeding programs have focused on energy cane for the enhancement of bioenergy yield in mills operating in the production of second-generation ethanol (2 G-ethanol). However, information on yield, nutritional and chemical composition of energy cane genotypes is still insufficient. Therefore, the objective of this study was to evaluate the biomass production and the amount of nutrients removed by energy cane genotypes under Brazilian field conditions. Between 2016 and 2018, trials were carried out under field conditions in the state of São Paulo, Brazil, throughout the plant cane and first ratoon growing seasons. The experiment was set up in a randomized block design containing 26 energy cane genotypes and two commercial sugarcane varieties. Agronomic and industrial characteristics related to the aboveground biomass (fresh and dry), chemical (sucrose, fiber, Brix, total recoverable sugar, extractives, ashes, lignin, cellulose, and hemicellulose), and nutritional (macro- and micronutrients) composition were evaluated. Some energy cane genotypes presented higher dry biomass yield (?25%), fiber (?40%), ashes (?50%), lower sucrose, total recoverable sugar (?60% and 50%, respectively), and lower extractives in stalks (?50%) compared to sugarcane genotypes. The average nutrient requirement per unit of fresh biomass produced (in kg per megagram) for energy cane of two growing seasons was 1.7 N, 0.35 P, 4.2 K, 0.45 Ca, 0.47 Mg, and 0.41 S, while for sugarcane it was 1.3 N, 0.25 P, 3.2 K, 0.28 Ca, 0.30 Mg, and 0.44 S, respectively. For more productive energy cane genotypes, those differences in nutritional demands are even greater. Therefore, higher amounts of fertilizers are required for energy cane genotypes. Moreover, since energy cane genotypes produce less sucrose, its use in industry will only be beneficial as long as their higher fiber content is fully converted into 2 G-ethanol or used for electricity cogeneration. MenosSugarcane (Saccharum spp.) is the main feedstock for bioethanol production in Brazil. Recently, some breeding programs have focused on energy cane for the enhancement of bioenergy yield in mills operating in the production of second-generation ethanol (2 G-ethanol). However, information on yield, nutritional and chemical composition of energy cane genotypes is still insufficient. Therefore, the objective of this study was to evaluate the biomass production and the amount of nutrients removed by energy cane genotypes under Brazilian field conditions. Between 2016 and 2018, trials were carried out under field conditions in the state of São Paulo, Brazil, throughout the plant cane and first ratoon growing seasons. The experiment was set up in a randomized block design containing 26 energy cane genotypes and two commercial sugarcane varieties. Agronomic and industrial characteristics related to the aboveground biomass (fresh and dry), chemical (sucrose, fiber, Brix, total recoverable sugar, extractives, ashes, lignin, cellulose, and hemicellulose), and nutritional (macro- and micronutrients) composition were evaluated. Some energy cane genotypes presented higher dry biomass yield (?25%), fiber (?40%), ashes (?50%), lower sucrose, total recoverable sugar (?60% and 50%, respectively), and lower extractives in stalks (?50%) compared to sugarcane genotypes. The average nutrient requirement per unit of fresh biomass produced (in kg per megagram) for energy cane of two growing seasons... Mostrar Tudo |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Cana-de-açúcar; Produção de fitomassa; Second-generation ethanol. |
|
Thesagro: |
Biomassa; Celulose. |
|
Thesaurus Nal: |
Biomass; Cellulose; Nutrients; Saccharum; Sucrose; Sugarcane. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
-- |
|
Marc: |
LEADER 03036naa a2200337 a 4500
001 2151072
005 2024-03-20
008 2023 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
024 7 $ahttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2022.115993$2DOI
100 1 $aBOSCHIERO, B. N.
245 $aBiomass yield, nutrient removal, and chemical composition of energy cane genotypes in Southeast Brazil.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2023
520 $aSugarcane (Saccharum spp.) is the main feedstock for bioethanol production in Brazil. Recently, some breeding programs have focused on energy cane for the enhancement of bioenergy yield in mills operating in the production of second-generation ethanol (2 G-ethanol). However, information on yield, nutritional and chemical composition of energy cane genotypes is still insufficient. Therefore, the objective of this study was to evaluate the biomass production and the amount of nutrients removed by energy cane genotypes under Brazilian field conditions. Between 2016 and 2018, trials were carried out under field conditions in the state of São Paulo, Brazil, throughout the plant cane and first ratoon growing seasons. The experiment was set up in a randomized block design containing 26 energy cane genotypes and two commercial sugarcane varieties. Agronomic and industrial characteristics related to the aboveground biomass (fresh and dry), chemical (sucrose, fiber, Brix, total recoverable sugar, extractives, ashes, lignin, cellulose, and hemicellulose), and nutritional (macro- and micronutrients) composition were evaluated. Some energy cane genotypes presented higher dry biomass yield (?25%), fiber (?40%), ashes (?50%), lower sucrose, total recoverable sugar (?60% and 50%, respectively), and lower extractives in stalks (?50%) compared to sugarcane genotypes. The average nutrient requirement per unit of fresh biomass produced (in kg per megagram) for energy cane of two growing seasons was 1.7 N, 0.35 P, 4.2 K, 0.45 Ca, 0.47 Mg, and 0.41 S, while for sugarcane it was 1.3 N, 0.25 P, 3.2 K, 0.28 Ca, 0.30 Mg, and 0.44 S, respectively. For more productive energy cane genotypes, those differences in nutritional demands are even greater. Therefore, higher amounts of fertilizers are required for energy cane genotypes. Moreover, since energy cane genotypes produce less sucrose, its use in industry will only be beneficial as long as their higher fiber content is fully converted into 2 G-ethanol or used for electricity cogeneration.
650 $aBiomass
650 $aCellulose
650 $aNutrients
650 $aSaccharum
650 $aSucrose
650 $aSugarcane
650 $aBiomassa
650 $aCelulose
653 $aCana-de-açúcar
653 $aProdução de fitomassa
653 $aSecond-generation ethanol
700 1 $aCASTRO, S. G. Q. de
700 1 $aCRUZ, L. P. da
700 1 $aCARVALHO, J. L. N.
700 1 $aSILVA, S. R.
700 1 $aBRESSIANI, J. A.
700 1 $aKÖLLN, O. T.
773 $tIndustrial Crops and Products$gv. 191, 115993, Jan. 2023.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Florestas (CNPF) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
URL |
Voltar
|
|
|
| Registros recuperados : 391 | |
| 3. |  | GUIMARÃES, C. M. Efeitos fisiológicos do estresse hídrico. In: ZIMMERMANN, M. J.de O.; ROCHA, M.; YAMADA, T. (Ed.). Cultura do feijoeiro: fatores que afetam a produtividade. Piracicaba: Associação Brasileira para Pesquisa da Potassa e do Fosfato, 1988. p. 157-174.| Tipo: Capítulo em Livro Técnico-Científico |
| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Arroz e Feijão. |
|   |
| 7. | | GUIMARÃES, C. M. Relacoes hidricas. In: ARAUJO, R. S.; RAVA, C. A.; STONE, L. F.; ZIMMERMANN, M. J. de O. (Coord.). Cultura do feijoeiro comum no Brasil. Piracicaba: POTAFOS, 1996. p. 139-167.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Arroz e Feijão. |
| |
| 9. | | GUIMARÃES, C. M.; YOKOYAMA, L. P. O arroz em plantio direto. In: BRESEGHELLO, F.; STONE, L. F. (Ed.). Tecnologia para o arroz de terras altas. Santo Antônio de Goiás: Embrapa Arroz e Feijão, 1998. p. 25-30.| Tipo: Capítulo em Livro Técnico-Científico |
| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Arroz e Feijão. |
|  |
| Registros recuperados : 391 | |
|
| Expressão de busca inválida. Verifique!!! |
|
|
