Registro Completo
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Solos. |
|
Data corrente: |
16/12/2019 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
11/11/2021 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
|
Circulação/Nível: |
A - 1 |
|
Autoria: |
CHALK, P. M.; INACIO, C. de T.; CHEN, D. |
|
Afiliação: |
PHILLIP MICHAEL CHALK, UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE; CAIO DE TEVES INACIO, CNPS; DELI CHEN, UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE. |
|
Título: |
Tracing the dynamics of animal excreta N in the soil-plant-atmosphere continuum using 15N enrichment. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2020 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Advances in Agronomy, v. 160, n. 1, p. 187-247, 2020. |
|
DOI: |
https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.agron.2019.10.004 |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
The increased demand for organic farm products, and the attendant restrictions on the use of synthetic N fertilizers in both traditional and organic agriculture, has focused attention on the efficacy of organic sources of N, including animal excreta. However, questions arise in regard to the agronomic and environmental benefits of excreta as alternative sources of N. These questions are best addressed through the experimental use of 15N-enriched excreta, which enable the labeled source to be unequivocally traced through the soil-plant-atmosphere continuum, which N difference or N equivalence techniques cannot achieve. In contrast to organic and inorganic N compounds that can be purchased commercially with a specified 15N label on the component N moieties, 15N-enriched excreta must be prepared by the investigator. The methods of production and the uniformity of labeling of the components of 15N-enriched excreta (feces, urine) and their admixture (slurry), the N use efficiencies of excreta in crop production, and comparisons and interactions of excreta with synthetic N sources are reviewed. Losses of N from excreta-amended soils to the environment and the residual N value of excreta in crop sequences are also examined. It was concluded that while similar agronomic and environmental issues surround the use of both synthetic fertilizers and excreta as sources of N for plant nutrition, the processes differ in intensity and duration both spatially and temporally. |
|
Thesagro: |
Amônia; Excremento; Fertilizante; Fezes; Lixiviação; Nitrogênio; Urina. |
|
Thesaurus NAL: |
Ammonia; Excreta; Feces; Fertilizers; Leaching; Nitrogen; Nitrous oxide; Urine. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
P Recursos Naturais, Ciências Ambientais e da Terra |
|
Marc: |
LEADER 02386naa a2200337 a 4500
001 2116926
005 2021-11-11
008 2020 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
024 7 $ahttps://doi.org/10.1016/bs.agron.2019.10.004$2DOI
100 1 $aCHALK, P. M.
245 $aTracing the dynamics of animal excreta N in the soil-plant-atmosphere continuum using 15N enrichment.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2020
520 $aThe increased demand for organic farm products, and the attendant restrictions on the use of synthetic N fertilizers in both traditional and organic agriculture, has focused attention on the efficacy of organic sources of N, including animal excreta. However, questions arise in regard to the agronomic and environmental benefits of excreta as alternative sources of N. These questions are best addressed through the experimental use of 15N-enriched excreta, which enable the labeled source to be unequivocally traced through the soil-plant-atmosphere continuum, which N difference or N equivalence techniques cannot achieve. In contrast to organic and inorganic N compounds that can be purchased commercially with a specified 15N label on the component N moieties, 15N-enriched excreta must be prepared by the investigator. The methods of production and the uniformity of labeling of the components of 15N-enriched excreta (feces, urine) and their admixture (slurry), the N use efficiencies of excreta in crop production, and comparisons and interactions of excreta with synthetic N sources are reviewed. Losses of N from excreta-amended soils to the environment and the residual N value of excreta in crop sequences are also examined. It was concluded that while similar agronomic and environmental issues surround the use of both synthetic fertilizers and excreta as sources of N for plant nutrition, the processes differ in intensity and duration both spatially and temporally.
650 $aAmmonia
650 $aExcreta
650 $aFeces
650 $aFertilizers
650 $aLeaching
650 $aNitrogen
650 $aNitrous oxide
650 $aUrine
650 $aAmônia
650 $aExcremento
650 $aFertilizante
650 $aFezes
650 $aLixiviação
650 $aNitrogênio
650 $aUrina
700 1 $aINACIO, C. de T.
700 1 $aCHEN, D.
773 $tAdvances in Agronomy$gv. 160, n. 1, p. 187-247, 2020.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Solos (CNPS) |
|
