| |
|
|
 | Acesso ao texto completo restrito à biblioteca da Embrapa Florestas. Para informações adicionais entre em contato com cnpf.biblioteca@embrapa.br. |
|
Registro Completo |
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Florestas. |
|
Data corrente: |
08/04/2016 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
08/04/2016 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
|
Autoria: |
BRASILEIRO, B. P.; MENDES, T. O. de P.; PETERNELLI, L. A.; SILVEIRA, L. C. I. da; RESENDE, M. D. V. de; BARBOSA, M. H. P. |
|
Afiliação: |
Bruno Portela Brasileiro, UFV; Thiago Otávio de Paula Mendes, Centro de Tecnologia Canavieira; Luiz Alexandre Peternelli, UFV; Luís Cláudio Inácio da Silveira, UFV; MARCOS DEON VILELA DE RESENDE, CNPF; Márcio Henrique Pereira Barbosa, UFV. |
|
Título: |
Simulated individual best linear unbiased prediction versus mass selection in sugarcane families. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2016 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Crop Science, v. 56, n. 2, p. 570-575, Mar./Apr. 2016. |
|
DOI: |
10.2135/cropsci2015.03.0199 |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
The purpose of this study was to compare the method BLUPIS (best linear unbiased prediction individual simulated) with mass selection in terms of efficiency in identifying the best genotypes in sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.) families. Mass selection was performed by two breeders with 25 yr of experience. The BLUPIS procedure selected families with higher means for tons of cane per hectare (TCH) than the overall mean. The number of plants selected per family was calculated by = (g? / g? ) k k j j n n, where ?gk indicates the genotypic value of the kth family; ?gj the genotypic value of the best family; and nj is equal to the number of plants selected in the best family, determined as nj = 45 in this study. Out of 20 best clones forwarded to the third test phase (T3), BLUPIS selected all in the first test phase (T1) and mass selection only two. Therefore, 100% of the clones in the second test phase (T2) had been selected by BLUPIS. The BLUPIS was most efficient in detecting the best genotypes, since all clones that were promoted up to phase T3 were descendants from the best families. The BLUPIS method should be applied in sugarcane breeding programs to ensure the selection of the best genotypes. |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
BLUP. |
|
Thesaurus Nal: |
Sugarcane. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
-- |
|
Marc: |
LEADER 01895naa a2200217 a 4500
001 2042976
005 2016-04-08
008 2016 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
024 7 $a10.2135/cropsci2015.03.0199$2DOI
100 1 $aBRASILEIRO, B. P.
245 $aSimulated individual best linear unbiased prediction versus mass selection in sugarcane families.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2016
520 $aThe purpose of this study was to compare the method BLUPIS (best linear unbiased prediction individual simulated) with mass selection in terms of efficiency in identifying the best genotypes in sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.) families. Mass selection was performed by two breeders with 25 yr of experience. The BLUPIS procedure selected families with higher means for tons of cane per hectare (TCH) than the overall mean. The number of plants selected per family was calculated by = (g? / g? ) k k j j n n, where ?gk indicates the genotypic value of the kth family; ?gj the genotypic value of the best family; and nj is equal to the number of plants selected in the best family, determined as nj = 45 in this study. Out of 20 best clones forwarded to the third test phase (T3), BLUPIS selected all in the first test phase (T1) and mass selection only two. Therefore, 100% of the clones in the second test phase (T2) had been selected by BLUPIS. The BLUPIS was most efficient in detecting the best genotypes, since all clones that were promoted up to phase T3 were descendants from the best families. The BLUPIS method should be applied in sugarcane breeding programs to ensure the selection of the best genotypes.
650 $aSugarcane
653 $aBLUP
700 1 $aMENDES, T. O. de P.
700 1 $aPETERNELLI, L. A.
700 1 $aSILVEIRA, L. C. I. da
700 1 $aRESENDE, M. D. V. de
700 1 $aBARBOSA, M. H. P.
773 $tCrop Science$gv. 56, n. 2, p. 570-575, Mar./Apr. 2016.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Florestas (CNPF) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
URL |
Voltar
|
|
|
Registro Completo
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Florestas. |
|
Data corrente: |
06/03/2015 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
12/03/2015 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Resumo em Anais de Congresso |
|
Autoria: |
AMARO, A. C. C.; QUEIROZ, D. L. de; BURCKHARDT, D. |
|
Afiliação: |
Ana Carolina Campos Amaro, Universidade Positivo; DALVA LUIZ DE QUEIROZ, CNPF; Daniel Burckhardt, Pesquisador e Curador do Naturhistorisches Museum. |
|
Título: |
Estudos de prospecção e biodiversidade de Psylloidea: Hemiptera. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2014 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
In: EVENTO DE INICIAÇÃO CIENTÍFICA DA EMBRAPA FLORESTAS, 13., 2014, Colombo. Anais. Colombo: Embrapa Florestas, 2014. |
|
Páginas: |
p. 44. |
|
Série: |
(Embrapa Florestas. Documentos, 267). |
|
Idioma: |
Português |
|
Notas: |
Resumo. |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Interação inseto-planta; Praga florestal. |
|
Thesagro: |
Conservação. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
-- |
|
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/item/119859/1/Estudos-de-prospeccao.pdf
|
|
Marc: |
LEADER 00666nam a2200193 a 4500
001 2010849
005 2015-03-12
008 2014 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
100 1 $aAMARO, A. C. C.
245 $aEstudos de prospecção e biodiversidade de Psylloidea$bHemiptera.$h[electronic resource]
260 $aIn: EVENTO DE INICIAÇÃO CIENTÍFICA DA EMBRAPA FLORESTAS, 13., 2014, Colombo. Anais. Colombo: Embrapa Florestas$c2014
300 $ap. 44.
490 $a(Embrapa Florestas. Documentos, 267).
500 $aResumo.
650 $aConservação
653 $aInteração inseto-planta
653 $aPraga florestal
700 1 $aQUEIROZ, D. L. de
700 1 $aBURCKHARDT, D.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Florestas (CNPF) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
| Nenhum registro encontrado para a expressão de busca informada. |
|
|
