| |
|
|
 | Acesso ao texto completo restrito à biblioteca da Embrapa Clima Temperado. Para informações adicionais entre em contato com cpact.biblioteca@embrapa.br. |
|
Registro Completo |
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Clima Temperado. |
|
Data corrente: |
03/10/2022 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
03/10/2022 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
|
Autoria: |
BASHIR, I.; NARDINO, M.; CASTRO, C. M.; HEIDEN, G. |
|
Afiliação: |
IKRAM BASHIR; MAICON NARDINO; CAROLINE MARQUES CASTRO, CPACT; GUSTAVO HEIDEN, CPACT. |
|
Título: |
Genotypic response and selection of potato germplasm under heat stress. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2022 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Potato Research, 2022. |
|
DOI: |
doi.org/10.1007/s11540-022-09573-w |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Notas: |
Published online 18 July 2022. |
|
Thesagro: |
Batata; Melhoramento Genético Vegetal. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
-- |
|
Marc: |
LEADER 00578naa a2200193 a 4500
001 2147082
005 2022-10-03
008 2022 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
024 7 $adoi.org/10.1007/s11540-022-09573-w$2DOI
100 1 $aBASHIR, I.
245 $aGenotypic response and selection of potato germplasm under heat stress.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2022
500 $aPublished online 18 July 2022.
650 $aBatata
650 $aMelhoramento Genético Vegetal
700 1 $aNARDINO, M.
700 1 $aCASTRO, C. M.
700 1 $aHEIDEN, G.
773 $tPotato Research, 2022.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Clima Temperado (CPACT) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
URL |
Voltar
|
|
|
Registro Completo
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Florestas. |
|
Data corrente: |
19/11/2018 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
22/02/2019 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
|
Circulação/Nível: |
A - 1 |
|
Autoria: |
LAMMEL, D. R.; BARTH, G.; OVASKAINEN, O.; CRUZ, L. M.; ZANATTA, J. A.; RYO, M.; SOUZA, E. M. de; PEDROSA, F. O. |
|
Afiliação: |
Daniel R. Lammel, UFPR; Gabriel Barth, ABC Research Foundation; Otso Ovaskainen, University of Helsinki; Leonardo M. Cruz, UFPR; JOSILEIA ACORDI ZANATTA, CNPF; Masahiro Ryo, 3Freie Universität Berlin and Berlin-Brandenburg Institute of Advanced Biodiversity Research (BBIB); Emanuel M. de Souza, UFPR; Fábio O. Pedrosa, UFPR. |
|
Título: |
Direct and indirect effects of a pH gradient bring insights into the mechanisms driving prokaryotic community structures. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2018 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Microbiome, v. 6, article 106, June 2018. 13 p. |
|
DOI: |
10.1186/s40168-018-0482-8 |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
Background: pH is frequently reported as the main driver for prokaryotic community structure in soils. However, pH changes are also linked to ?spillover effects? on other chemical parameters (e.g., availability of Al, Fe, Mn, Zn, and Cu) and plant growth, but these indirect effects on the microbial communities are rarely investigated. Usually, pH also co-varies with some confounding factors, such as land use, soil management (e.g., tillage and chemical inputs), plant cover, and/or edapho-climatic conditions. So, a more comprehensive analysis of the direct and indirect effects of pH brings a better understanding of the mechanisms driving prokaryotic (archaeal and bacterial) community structures. Results: We evaluated an agricultural soil pH gradient (from 4 to 6, the typical range for tropical farms), in a liming gradient with confounding factors minimized, investigating relationships between prokaryotic communities (16S rRNA) and physical?chemical parameters (indirect effects). Correlations, hierarchical modeling of species communities (HMSC), and random forest (RF) modeling indicated that both direct and indirect effects of the pH gradient affected the prokaryotic communities. Some OTUs were more affected by the pH changes (e.g., some Actinobacteria), while others were more affected by the indirect pH effects (e.g., some Proteobacteria). HMSC detected a phylogenetic signal related to the effects. Both HMSC and RF indicated that the main indirect effect was the pH changes on the availability of some elements (e.g., Al, Fe, and Cu), and secondarily, effects on plant growth and nutrient cycling also affected the OTUs. Additionally, we found that some of the OTUs that responded to pH also correlated with CO2, CH4, and N2O greenhouse gas fluxes. Conclusions: Our results indicate that there are two distinct pH-related mechanisms driving prokaryotic community structures, the direct effect and ?spillover effects? of pH (indirect effects). Moreover, the indirect effects are highly relevant for some OTUs and consequently for the community structure; therefore, it is a mechanism that should be further investigated in microbial ecology. MenosBackground: pH is frequently reported as the main driver for prokaryotic community structure in soils. However, pH changes are also linked to ?spillover effects? on other chemical parameters (e.g., availability of Al, Fe, Mn, Zn, and Cu) and plant growth, but these indirect effects on the microbial communities are rarely investigated. Usually, pH also co-varies with some confounding factors, such as land use, soil management (e.g., tillage and chemical inputs), plant cover, and/or edapho-climatic conditions. So, a more comprehensive analysis of the direct and indirect effects of pH brings a better understanding of the mechanisms driving prokaryotic (archaeal and bacterial) community structures. Results: We evaluated an agricultural soil pH gradient (from 4 to 6, the typical range for tropical farms), in a liming gradient with confounding factors minimized, investigating relationships between prokaryotic communities (16S rRNA) and physical?chemical parameters (indirect effects). Correlations, hierarchical modeling of species communities (HMSC), and random forest (RF) modeling indicated that both direct and indirect effects of the pH gradient affected the prokaryotic communities. Some OTUs were more affected by the pH changes (e.g., some Actinobacteria), while others were more affected by the indirect pH effects (e.g., some Proteobacteria). HMSC detected a phylogenetic signal related to the effects. Both HMSC and RF indicated that the main indirect effect was the pH changes on... Mostrar Tudo |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
16S rRNA; Ecologia microbiana; Illumina sequencing; Solo sub tropical; Sub-tropical soil. |
|
Thesagro: |
Bactéria; Ph; Química do Solo. |
|
Thesaurus NAL: |
Archaea; Microbial ecology; Soil chemistry. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
P Recursos Naturais, Ciências Ambientais e da Terra |
|
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/item/186279/1/2018-Josi-Microbiome-Direct.pdf
|
|
Marc: |
LEADER 03160naa a2200349 a 4500
001 2099575
005 2019-02-22
008 2018 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
024 7 $a10.1186/s40168-018-0482-8$2DOI
100 1 $aLAMMEL, D. R.
245 $aDirect and indirect effects of a pH gradient bring insights into the mechanisms driving prokaryotic community structures.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2018
520 $aBackground: pH is frequently reported as the main driver for prokaryotic community structure in soils. However, pH changes are also linked to ?spillover effects? on other chemical parameters (e.g., availability of Al, Fe, Mn, Zn, and Cu) and plant growth, but these indirect effects on the microbial communities are rarely investigated. Usually, pH also co-varies with some confounding factors, such as land use, soil management (e.g., tillage and chemical inputs), plant cover, and/or edapho-climatic conditions. So, a more comprehensive analysis of the direct and indirect effects of pH brings a better understanding of the mechanisms driving prokaryotic (archaeal and bacterial) community structures. Results: We evaluated an agricultural soil pH gradient (from 4 to 6, the typical range for tropical farms), in a liming gradient with confounding factors minimized, investigating relationships between prokaryotic communities (16S rRNA) and physical?chemical parameters (indirect effects). Correlations, hierarchical modeling of species communities (HMSC), and random forest (RF) modeling indicated that both direct and indirect effects of the pH gradient affected the prokaryotic communities. Some OTUs were more affected by the pH changes (e.g., some Actinobacteria), while others were more affected by the indirect pH effects (e.g., some Proteobacteria). HMSC detected a phylogenetic signal related to the effects. Both HMSC and RF indicated that the main indirect effect was the pH changes on the availability of some elements (e.g., Al, Fe, and Cu), and secondarily, effects on plant growth and nutrient cycling also affected the OTUs. Additionally, we found that some of the OTUs that responded to pH also correlated with CO2, CH4, and N2O greenhouse gas fluxes. Conclusions: Our results indicate that there are two distinct pH-related mechanisms driving prokaryotic community structures, the direct effect and ?spillover effects? of pH (indirect effects). Moreover, the indirect effects are highly relevant for some OTUs and consequently for the community structure; therefore, it is a mechanism that should be further investigated in microbial ecology.
650 $aArchaea
650 $aMicrobial ecology
650 $aSoil chemistry
650 $aBactéria
650 $aPh
650 $aQuímica do Solo
653 $a16S rRNA
653 $aEcologia microbiana
653 $aIllumina sequencing
653 $aSolo sub tropical
653 $aSub-tropical soil
700 1 $aBARTH, G.
700 1 $aOVASKAINEN, O.
700 1 $aCRUZ, L. M.
700 1 $aZANATTA, J. A.
700 1 $aRYO, M.
700 1 $aSOUZA, E. M. de
700 1 $aPEDROSA, F. O.
773 $tMicrobiome$gv. 6, article 106, June 2018. 13 p.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Florestas (CNPF) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
| Expressão de busca inválida. Verifique!!! |
|
|
