|
|
Registro Completo |
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Uva e Vinho. |
Data corrente: |
02/09/2011 |
Data da última atualização: |
17/01/2019 |
Tipo da produção científica: |
Folder/Folheto/Cartilha |
Autoria: |
SULZBACH, A.; FERREIRA, B. A.; HIWATASHI, K. M.; PRADO, L. E. M.; GRAFF, M. L.; TURCHET, N. G.; GAVA, R.; ZILIO, R. A.; SEBBEN, S. de S.; ZARPELON, S. L.; FRONZA, T. M.; FIALHO, V. M. Z. B. |
Afiliação: |
ANELISE SULZBACH, CNPUV; BEATRIZ ALVES FERREIRA, CNPUV; KATIA MIDORI HIWATASHI, CNPUV; LUCIANA ELENA MENDONCA PRADO, CNPUV; MAURO LUIZ GRAFF, CNPUV; NEMORA GAZZOLA TURCHET, CNPUV; RENATA GAVA, CNPUV; ROQUE ANTONIO ZILIO, CNPUV; SANDRA DE SOUZA SEBBEN, CNPUV; SERGIO LUIZ ZARPELON, CNPUV; TANIA MARI FRONZA, CNPUV; VIVIANE MARIA ZANELLA BELLO FIALHO, CNPUV. |
Título: |
Atendimento ao cliente. |
Ano de publicação: |
2011 |
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Bento Gonçalves: Embrapa Uva e Vinho, 2011. |
Descrição Física: |
1 folder. |
Série: |
(Reciclando Idéias, 3). |
Idioma: |
Português |
Palavras-Chave: |
Atendimento; Atendimento pessoal; Cliente; Correspondência; Recepção; Telefone. |
Thesagro: |
Comunicação. |
Thesaurus Nal: |
e-mail. |
Categoria do assunto: |
-- |
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/item/41078/1/Atendimento-ao-cliente-Reciclando-Ideias3.pdf
|
Marc: |
LEADER 00886nam a2200349 a 4500 001 1899534 005 2019-01-17 008 2011 bl uuuu u0uu1 u #d 100 1 $aSULZBACH, A. 245 $aAtendimento ao cliente. 260 $aBento Gonçalves: Embrapa Uva e Vinho$c2011 300 $c1 folder. 490 $a(Reciclando Idéias, 3). 650 $ae-mail 650 $aComunicação 653 $aAtendimento 653 $aAtendimento pessoal 653 $aCliente 653 $aCorrespondência 653 $aRecepção 653 $aTelefone 700 1 $aFERREIRA, B. A. 700 1 $aHIWATASHI, K. M. 700 1 $aPRADO, L. E. M. 700 1 $aGRAFF, M. L. 700 1 $aTURCHET, N. G. 700 1 $aGAVA, R. 700 1 $aZILIO, R. A. 700 1 $aSEBBEN, S. de S. 700 1 $aZARPELON, S. L. 700 1 $aFRONZA, T. M. 700 1 $aFIALHO, V. M. Z. B.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
Registro original: |
Embrapa Uva e Vinho (CNPUV) |
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
URL |
Voltar
|
|
Registro Completo
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Meio-Norte. |
Data corrente: |
22/07/2013 |
Data da última atualização: |
30/05/2022 |
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
Circulação/Nível: |
B - 1 |
Autoria: |
CASTRO, R. S.; SILVA, P. S. L.; CARDOSO, M. J. |
Afiliação: |
Renato S Castro, UFERSA; Paulo Sérgio L Silva, UFERSA; MILTON JOSE CARDOSO, CPAMN. |
Título: |
Baby corn, green corn, and dry corn yield of corn cultivars. |
Ano de publicação: |
2013 |
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Horticultura Brasileira, Brasília, DF, v. 31, n. 1, p. 100-105, jan./mar. 2013. |
ISSN: |
0102-0536 |
Idioma: |
Inglês |
Conteúdo: |
In corn, when the first female inflorescence is removed, the plant often produces new female inflorescences. This allows the first ear to be harvested as baby corn (BC) and the second as green corn (GC) or dry corn (DC), that is, mature corn. The flexibility provided by a variety of harvested products allows the grower to compete with better conditions in the markets. We evaluated BC, GC, and DC yields in corn cultivars AG 1051, AG 2060, and BRS 2020, after the first ear was harvested as BC. A random block design with ten replicates was utilized. The yields of MM, MV and MS were higher when these products were individually harvested than when they were harvested in combination with baby corn (BC + GC and BC + DC). Cultivar BRS 2020 was the best for producing BC exclusively, considering the number and weight of marketable unhusked ears and the number (NH) of marketable husked ears. Considering weight (WH) of BC marketable husked ears, cultivar AG 1051 was the best. Cultivars did not differ in baby corn yield when this product was harvested in combination with MS or MV, except with regard to NH and WH, with AG 1051 being superior. The cultivars did not differ between total number of ears and number of marketable unhusked green ears. However, cultivars AG 1051 and AG 2060 were the best with respect to marketable unhusked green ears and number and weight of marketable husked green ears. Cultivar AG 1051 was the best with regard to kernel yield. |
Palavras-Chave: |
Grain; Green ears; Milho-verde; Minimilho; Prolificacy; Prolificidade. |
Thesagro: |
Espiga; Rendimento; Zea mays. |
Categoria do assunto: |
-- F Plantas e Produtos de Origem Vegetal |
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/item/86511/1/HortBrasMiltonCardoso.pdf
|
Marc: |
LEADER 02153naa a2200265 a 4500 001 1962560 005 2022-05-30 008 2013 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d 022 $a0102-0536 100 1 $aCASTRO, R. S. 245 $aBaby corn, green corn, and dry corn yield of corn cultivars. 260 $c2013 520 $aIn corn, when the first female inflorescence is removed, the plant often produces new female inflorescences. This allows the first ear to be harvested as baby corn (BC) and the second as green corn (GC) or dry corn (DC), that is, mature corn. The flexibility provided by a variety of harvested products allows the grower to compete with better conditions in the markets. We evaluated BC, GC, and DC yields in corn cultivars AG 1051, AG 2060, and BRS 2020, after the first ear was harvested as BC. A random block design with ten replicates was utilized. The yields of MM, MV and MS were higher when these products were individually harvested than when they were harvested in combination with baby corn (BC + GC and BC + DC). Cultivar BRS 2020 was the best for producing BC exclusively, considering the number and weight of marketable unhusked ears and the number (NH) of marketable husked ears. Considering weight (WH) of BC marketable husked ears, cultivar AG 1051 was the best. Cultivars did not differ in baby corn yield when this product was harvested in combination with MS or MV, except with regard to NH and WH, with AG 1051 being superior. The cultivars did not differ between total number of ears and number of marketable unhusked green ears. However, cultivars AG 1051 and AG 2060 were the best with respect to marketable unhusked green ears and number and weight of marketable husked green ears. Cultivar AG 1051 was the best with regard to kernel yield. 650 $aEspiga 650 $aRendimento 650 $aZea mays 653 $aGrain 653 $aGreen ears 653 $aMilho-verde 653 $aMinimilho 653 $aProlificacy 653 $aProlificidade 700 1 $aSILVA, P. S. L. 700 1 $aCARDOSO, M. J. 773 $tHorticultura Brasileira, Brasília, DF$gv. 31, n. 1, p. 100-105, jan./mar. 2013.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
Registro original: |
Embrapa Meio-Norte (CPAMN) |
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
Expressão de busca inválida. Verifique!!! |
|
|