01962naa a2200241 a 450000100080000000500110000800800410001902400650006010000280012524501270015326000090028052011920028965000170148165000180149865000130151665300100152970000180153970000210155770000180157870000200159670000190161677300850163519604562017-05-18       2012    bl uuuu     u00u1 u    #d7 ahttp://dx.doi.org/10.18512/1980-6477/rbms.v11n3p254-2672DOI1 aANDRADE, C. de L. T. de  aSimulated yield and return of a maize crop fertilized with different sources and rates of nitrogen.h[electronic resource]  c2012  aThe goal of this study was to evaluate yield and net return of a maize crop fertilized with different rates of conventional mineral fertilizer and cattle manure. The CSM-CERES-Maize model was used to simulate the nitrogen (N) fertilization management scenarios. Twelve treatments were simulated as follows: T1, T2 and T3 were, rates of 90, 130 and 160 kg ha-1 of N as conventional fertilizer, respectively; T4a, T4b and T4c were 4.5 t ha-1 of air-dried cattle manure, rated at 17.05, 22.73 and 34.09 US$ per ton, respectively; T5a, T5b and T5c were 6.5 t ha-1 of air-dried cattle manure, rated at US$ 17.05, US$ 22.73 and US$ 34.09 per ton, respectively; T6a, T6b and T6c were 8.0 t ha-1 of air-dried cattle manure, rated at US$ 17.05, US$ 22.73 and US$ 34.09 US$ per ton. It was assumed that the air-dried cattle manure has 2% of N. The conventional mineral fertilization with a nitrogen rate of 90 kg ha-1 (T1) resulted in an average yield of 4.812 kg ha-1 and average profitability of US$ 35.56 ha-1, while higher nitrogen rates caused economic losses. Profitabilities of US$ 120.90 and US$ 183.50 ha-1 were obtained with cattle manure rates of 6,500 and 8,000 kg ha -1, respectively.  aFertilizante  aRentabilidade  aZea mays  aDSSAT1 aAMARAL, T. A.1 aDUARTE, J. de O.1 aGARCIA, J. C.1 aSILVA, D. de F.1 aMARTINS, P. C.  tRevista Brasileira de Milho e Sorgo, Sete Lagoasgv. 11, n. 3, p. 254-267, 2012.