03705naa a2200409 a 450000100080000000500110000800800410001902400380006010000250009824501350012326000090025852025100026765000200277765000180279765000200281565000180283565000170285365000100287065000180288065000210289865000120291965000190293165000180295065000290296865000150299765000230301265000140303565300300304965300310307970000220311070000200313270000190315270000170317170000210318870000190320977300670322819037812019-09-23 2011 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d7 a10.1016/j.vetpar.2010.10.0492DOI1 aGUIMARÃES, A. de S. aManagement practices to control gastrointestinal parasites in dairy and beef goats in Minas Gerais; Brazil.h[electronic resource] c2011 aAbstract: Parasitic infection is recognized worldwide as a limiting factor in the production of goats, and various control methods are used to reduce economic losses, often without considering the epidemiology of the parasites. This has led to the development of highly tolerant parasite populations and the presence of chemical residues in the beef and milk. The objective of this study was to determine the level of knowledge of goat farmers about parasitic diseases and to correlate this with the epidemiology of endoparasites and parasite control practices in goat farms in the state of Minas Gerais, Brazil. The analysis was based on a questionnaire applied by trained veterinarians. The sample was homogeneous throughout the state, covering 18.4% (157/853) of municipalities. Eighty-four dairy goat farms in 81 municipalities and 200 properties with beef goats in 76 municipalities were evaluated. The herd size per goat farm ranged from 4 to 57 (average 24) for beef herds and from 2 to 308 (average 63) for dairy farms. The majority of the beef herd production was extensive and semi-extensive (98.5%), while the dairy herds were maintained under intensive farming (98.8%). The mixed production of goats and sheep was reported by 36.5% of beef goat farmers and by 20.2% of dairy goat farmers. Among the beef goats farms on which the technological level was determined, 2.0% were categorized as having high technological level, 34.5% as medium, and 63.5% as low. Of the 84 dairy farms, 30% operated at a high, 47% at a medium, and 23% at a low technological level. The adoption of practices to reduce parasitism, such as the quarantine of animals, treatment of newly arrived animals, regular cleaning of the floor, and technical assistance, was significantly higher on dairy farms than on beef farms. Although 85.7% of dairy farmers and 83% of beef farmers medicate their animals, the treatments were performed without technical criteria, and deworming intervals ranged from 30 to 120 days or more. The average interval between treatments was significantly longer in dairy goat herds (4.8 months) than in the beef herds (3.6 months). The most commonly used drugs were macrocyclic lactones (37.7% in dairy and 39.5% in beef herds) and benzimidazoles (48.9% in dairy and 31.5% in beef herds). Goat production in Minas Gerais is still in its infancy, and even though using a control program associated with other health practices, producers still rely heavily on chemicals to get satisfactory results. aAnimal diseases aAnthelmintics aDisease control aEndoparasites aEpidemiology aGoats aHelminthiasis aAnti-helmíntico aCaprino aDoença animal aEpidemiologia aHelminto gastrintestinal aNematóide aParasito de animal aVerminose aGastrointestinal diseases aNematódeo gastrintestinal1 aGOUVEIA, A. M. G.1 aCARMO, F. B. do1 aGOUVEIA, G. C.1 aSILVA, M. X.1 aVIEIRA, L. da S.1 aMOLENTO, M. B. tVeterinary Parasitologygv. 76, n. 2/3, p. 265-269, Mar. 2011.