01421naa a2200229 a 450000100080000000500110000800800410001910000210006024500410008126000090012230000160013150000170014752007530016465000120091765300190092965300130094865300260096165300220098770000210100970000130103077301480104310070642011-03-02       1997    bl uuuu     u00u1 u    #d1 aVILELA, P. R. S.  aData flow based integration testing.  c1997  ap. 203-210.  aWOVTSO 1997.  aTwo different approaches to extend Structural Unit Testing Criteria to Integration Testing are presented. Their basic difference is the integration model used. Linnenkugel and Müllerburg use the program call-graph to represent the call structure of the program, interprocedural dataflow information is extracted from each unit defining interprocedural def-use associations. Harrold and Soffa represent the call structure of the program by a summary graph, which abstracts the interprocedural dataflow structure of the program. An approach based on the ideas and concepts presented on these two previous works and on the concept of potencial uses to extend Unit Testing Criteria based on Data Flow Analysis to Integration Testing is also presented.  aTesting  aFluxo de dados  aSoftware  aTeste de integração  aTeste de software1 aMALDONADO, J. C.1 aJINO, M.  tIn: WORKSHOP DO PROJETO VALIDAÇÃO E TESTE DE SISTEMAS DE OPERAÇÃO, 1997, Águas de Lindóia, SP. Anais... [Águas de Lindóia: s.n., 1997].