01634naa a2200421 a 450000100080000000500110000800800410001902400520006010000230011224501580013526000090029352003400030265000250064265000180066765000180068565000180070365000210072165000220074265000170076465300290078165300180081065300230082865300200085165300270087165300350089865300330093365300250096665300200099170000230101170000190103470000140105370000250106770000180109270000190111070000140112970000120114377300570115521531512023-04-17       2023    bl uuuu     u00u1 u    #d7 ahttps://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-023-00783-92DOI1 aSILVA, R. F. B. da  aSlow-down of deforestation following a Brazilian forest policy was less effective on private lands than in all conservation areas.h[electronic resource]  c2023  aIn this study we address two main questions: (1) Has the implementation of the NFC (and the CAR) allowed Brazil to reach the national Forest Code´s aim of reducing the loss (and even enhance the recovery) of natural vegetation on private rural lands? (2) What are the overall effects of the NFC implementation on carbon sequestration?  aCarbon sequestration  aDeforestation  aForest policy  aPrivate lands  aVegetation cover  aCobertura Vegetal  aDesmatamento  aCadastro Ambiental Rural  aCarbon stocks  aEstoque de carbono  aNew Forest Code  aNovo código florestal  aPolítica florestal brasileira  aRural Environmental Cadastre  aSequestro de carbono  aTerras privadas1 aVICTORIA, D. de C.1 aNOSSACK, F. A.1 aVIÑA, A.1 aMILLINGTON, J. D. A.1 aVIEIRA, S. A.1 aBATISTELLA, M.1 aMORAN, E.1 aLIU, J.  tCommunications Earth & Environmentgv. 4, 111, 2023.