02269naa a2200301 a 450000100080000000500110000800800410001910000140006024502130007426000090028752012840029665000270158065000100160765000170161765300240163465300220165865300210168065300180170170000200171970000160173970000230175570000160177870000280179470000180182270000180184070000160185877300930187421257052020-10-20       2020    bl uuuu     u00u1 u    #d1 aBAMPI, D.  aEvaluation of reproductive and animal welfare parameters of swine females of different genetic lines submitted to different reproductive management and housing systems during pregnancy.h[electronic resource]  c2020  aAbstract: The aim of this study was to evaluate swine females of different genetic lines submitted to different reproductive management and housing systems during pregnancy on reproductive performance and animal welfare parameters. After artificial insemination protocol, 524 females were divided into two gestation housing systems: PEN1=animals housed in individual stalls during the breeding and after group-housed; PEN32=animals housed in individual stalls from breeding until 32 days of pregnancy and after group-housed. The number of piglets born, and the pregnancy and farrowing rates were evaluated. Welfare parameters related to the pregnancy phase were used. Females who weaned more piglets in the previous farrowing had a higher number of piglets born at the next farrowing. The pregnancy rate was affected by the number of semen doses. The farrowing rate was not influenced by the evaluated parameters, with average value of 91.36%. There was no effect of the gestation housing system and the genetic lines on pregnancy and farrowing rates, with values above 90.0%. The animal welfare indicators showed more compromised parameters in PEN1 system. PEN1 system did not impair the reproductive performance although it presented more compromised animal welfare parameters.  aPeríodo de Gestação  aPorca  aSuinocultura  aAlojamento coletivo  aBaias individuais  aBem-estar animal  aFêmea suína1 aBORSTNEZ, K. K.1 aDIAS, C. P.1 aDALLA COSTA, O. A.1 aMOREIRA, F.1 aOLIVEIRA JÚNIOR, J. M.1 aSCHWEGLER, E.1 aRAUBER, L. P.1 aBIANCHI, I.  tArquivo Brasileiro de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecniagv. 72, n. 5, p.1675-1682, 2020.