02012naa a2200253 a 450000100080000000500110000800800410001902400390006010000230009924501250012226000090024752012420025665000110149865000220150965000200153165000240155165000140157570000210158970000190161070000200162970000230164970000200167277300660169221067682019-11-11       2018    bl uuuu     u00u1 u    #d7 a10.1080/01904167.2018.14341992DOI1 aMATOS, G. S. B. de  aDris calculation methods for evaluating the nutritional status of oil palm in the Eastern Amazon.h[electronic resource]  c2018  aThis study aimed to evaluate six Diagnosis and Recommendation Integrated System (DRIS) calculation methods, including two ways to choose the nutrient ratio [F (Letzsch) or R (Nick) values] combined with three functions (Beaufils, Jones, or Elwali and Gascho), and to generate nutritional diagnoses for oil palm. A total of 144 foliar samples in 33 plots in the Eastern Amazon, Brazil, were used. Except for potassium (K) in all calculation methods, the DRIS indices showed no correlation with soil nutrients. Regardless of the formula, the nutritional balance index correlated with the productivity (significant r values) and similar diagnostics were obtained. These diagnoses were reliable according to the chi-square test (χ2), and most observed frequencies presented χ2 calculated less than χ2 tabulated. The average frequencies of samples with nutrient deficiency were 51%, 42%, 37%, 35%, 32%, 30%, 30%, 25%, 20%, 12%, and 12% for samples with nitrogen (N), boron (B), manganese (Mn), sulfur (S), K, copper (Cu), iron (Fe), zinc (Zn), calcium (Ca), phosphorus (P), and magnesium (Mg), respectively. All tested DRIS methods may be used, and their diagnoses indicate the most common nutritional deficiencies in oil palm.  aDendê  aElaeis Guineensis  aElaeis Oleifera  aFertilidade do Solo  aNutriente1 aFERNANDES, A. R.1 aWADT, P. G. S.1 aFRANZINI, V. I.1 aSOUZA, E. M. de C.1 aRAMOS, H. M. N.  tJournal of Plant Nutritiongv. 41, n. 10, p. 1240-1252, 2018.