02586naa a2200217 a 450000100080000000500110000800800410001902400390006010000210009924501690012026000090028950001790029852017240047765000130220165000170221465000110223165300150224265300340225770000140229177300630230521043032019-12-27       2019    bl uuuu     u00u1 u    #d7 a10.1080/08039410.2018.14276212DOI1 aBARTHOLDSON, Ö.  aBrokers - a weapon of the weakbthe impact of bureaucracy and brokers on a community-based forest management project in the brazilian Amazon.h[electronic resource]  c2019  aPublicado também em: ANNUAL MEETING OF THE FLARE, 4., 2018, Frederiksberg. Abstracts... [Frederiksberg]: University of Copenhagen; [Ann Arbor: University of Michigan], 2018.  aThe bureaucracy that regulates land tenure, agriculture and community-based forest management (CBFM) in the Brazilian Amazon aims at achieving an impartial administration and process of practices that complies with the intention of laws, regulations and decrees and safeguards the rights of the citizens at large and particularly people in a vulnerable position. Yet the local power-holders? actual interpretation and implementation of laws, regulations and decrees is to large extent opaque, arbitrary and contingent upon subjective intentions, interests and perspectives. These irregularities and arbitrariness affect poor smallholders hard and hamper their access to resources and formal rights. This paper intends to show how the smallholders who have initiated a CBFM project in a settlement in the north-eastern region of the Brazilian Amazon are unable to manage the project on their own, because they lack financial capital, as well as the necessary social and political capital to be able to obtain compulsory permits and make the contracted firm and people comply with the terms of the contracts. In order to transcend these difficulties, the smallholders utilize their social networks, above all vertical contacts, to attract brokers. The paper argues that this strategy assigns great power and influence to various brokers, and affects how policies are implemented, how resources are distributed or not distributed and how power relations are articulated. These aspects of governance and governmentality are grossly under-theorized in research on development projects in general and CBFM in particular. The paper is based on participant observation and various forms of interviews, carried out in 2012?2017.  aAmazonia  aDesmatamento  aManejo  aBurocracia  aManejo florestal comunitário1 aPORRO, R.  tForum for Development Studiesgv. 46, n. 1, p. 1-22, 2019.