01798nam a2200277 a 450000100080000000500110000800800410001902000220006010000180008224501470010026002560024730000120050350000150051552008040053065000160133465000140135065000220136465000130138665000170139965300160141665300170143265300140144970000230146370000160148670000180150220180002016-03-15       2015    bl uuuu     u00u1 u    #d  a978-85-240-4343-71 aCAMPOS, W. P.  aDichotomy between urban and rural areasbstatistical data may not reveal the synergy between these two existing spaces.h[electronic resource]  aIn: INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON AGRICULTURAL STATISTICS, 6., 2013, Rio de Janeiro. Improving statistics for food security, sustainable agriculture, and rural development: linking statistics with decision making: proceedings. Rio de Janeiro: IBGEc2015  ap. 722.  aICAS 2013.  aAn analysis of several indicators, socio-economic and environmental, through the Dashboard of Sustainability is possible to tell which category has the highest rate of farmer sustainability, whether smallholders or monoculture. However, the secondary data available in Brazil today does not support a thorough analysis of the participation of each actor and to which the interconnection between the actors and their synergy in local economic activity. Since, given the narrowing between urban and rural, the statistical data available are not able to demonstrate the extent to which gives the rural-urban dichotomy. Thus, it is relevant to point out and discuss ways to provide consistent statistical data and be, in fact, able to demonstrate the local reality of a region within the welfare actors.  aRural areas  aSynergism  aWelfare economics  aEconomia  aEstatística  aÁrea rural  aÁrea urbana  aDicotomia1 aSILVEIRA, M. A. da1 aCALIARI, M.1 aWANDER, A. E.