|
|
Registro Completo |
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Semiárido. |
Data corrente: |
19/08/2021 |
Data da última atualização: |
19/08/2021 |
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
Autoria: |
VILVERT, J. C.; FREITAS, S. T. de; FERREIRA, M. A. R.; COSTTA, E. B. S. da; AROUCHA, E. M. M. |
Afiliação: |
JOÃO CLAUDIO VILVERT; SERGIO TONETTO DE FREITAS, CPATSA; MARIA APARECIDA RODRIGUES FERREIRA; ELEONORA BARBOSA SANTIAGO DA COSTA; EDNA MARIA MENDES AROUCHA. |
Título: |
Sample size for postharvest quality traits of Palmer mangoes. |
Ano de publicação: |
2021 |
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Revista Brasileira de Fruticultura, v. 43, n. 5, e-014, 2021. |
DOI: |
http://dx.doi.org /10.1590/0100-29452021014 |
Idioma: |
Inglês |
Conteúdo: |
The objective of this study was to determine the most efficient sample size required to estimate the mean of postharvest quality traits of ?Palmer? mangoes harvested in two growing seasons. A total of 50 mangoes were harvested at maturity stage 2, in winter (June 2020) and spring (October 2020), and evaluated for weight, length, ventral and transverse diameter, skin and pulp L*, C* and hº, dry matter, firmness, soluble solids (SS), titratable acidity (TA) and the SS/TA ratio. According to the results, the coefficient of variation (CV) of fruit quality traits ranged from 2.1% to 18.1%. The highest CV in both harvests was observed for the SS/TA ratio, while the lowest was reported for pulp hº. In order to estimate the mean of physicochemical traits of ?Palmer? mangoes, 12 fruits are needed in the winter and 14 in the spring, considering an estimation error of 10% and a confidence interval of 95%. TA and the SS/TA ratio required the highest sample size, while L* and hº required the lowest sample size. In conclusion, the variability was different among physicochemical traits and seasons, implying that different sample sizes are required to estimate the mean of different quality traits in different growing seasons. |
Palavras-Chave: |
Planejamento experimental. |
Thesagro: |
Amostragem; Manga; Mangifera Indica; Pós-Colheita. |
Thesaurus Nal: |
Mangoes; Postharvest physiology; Postharvest technology; Sampling. |
Categoria do assunto: |
G Melhoramento Genético |
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/item/225354/1/Sample-size-for-postharvest-quality-traits-2021.pdf
|
Marc: |
LEADER 02087naa a2200289 a 4500 001 2133736 005 2021-08-19 008 2021 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d 024 7 $ahttp://dx.doi.org /10.1590/0100-29452021014$2DOI 100 1 $aVILVERT, J. C. 245 $aSample size for postharvest quality traits of Palmer mangoes.$h[electronic resource] 260 $c2021 520 $aThe objective of this study was to determine the most efficient sample size required to estimate the mean of postharvest quality traits of ?Palmer? mangoes harvested in two growing seasons. A total of 50 mangoes were harvested at maturity stage 2, in winter (June 2020) and spring (October 2020), and evaluated for weight, length, ventral and transverse diameter, skin and pulp L*, C* and hº, dry matter, firmness, soluble solids (SS), titratable acidity (TA) and the SS/TA ratio. According to the results, the coefficient of variation (CV) of fruit quality traits ranged from 2.1% to 18.1%. The highest CV in both harvests was observed for the SS/TA ratio, while the lowest was reported for pulp hº. In order to estimate the mean of physicochemical traits of ?Palmer? mangoes, 12 fruits are needed in the winter and 14 in the spring, considering an estimation error of 10% and a confidence interval of 95%. TA and the SS/TA ratio required the highest sample size, while L* and hº required the lowest sample size. In conclusion, the variability was different among physicochemical traits and seasons, implying that different sample sizes are required to estimate the mean of different quality traits in different growing seasons. 650 $aMangoes 650 $aPostharvest physiology 650 $aPostharvest technology 650 $aSampling 650 $aAmostragem 650 $aManga 650 $aMangifera Indica 650 $aPós-Colheita 653 $aPlanejamento experimental 700 1 $aFREITAS, S. T. de 700 1 $aFERREIRA, M. A. R. 700 1 $aCOSTTA, E. B. S. da 700 1 $aAROUCHA, E. M. M. 773 $tRevista Brasileira de Fruticultura$gv. 43, n. 5, e-014, 2021.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
Registro original: |
Embrapa Semiárido (CPATSA) |
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
URL |
Voltar
|
|
Registro Completo
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Agrobiologia; Embrapa Meio-Norte. |
Data corrente: |
07/01/2020 |
Data da última atualização: |
08/01/2021 |
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
Circulação/Nível: |
A - 2 |
Autoria: |
MIGUEL, D. L.; SILVA, E. M. R. da; SILVA, C. F. da; PEREIRA, M. G.; LEITE, L. F. C. |
Afiliação: |
ELIANE MARIA RIBEIRO DA SILVA, CNPAB; Cristiane Figueira da Silva, UFRRJ; UFRRJ; Luiz Fernando Carvalho Leite. |
Título: |
Soil microbiological properties and enzyme activity in agroforestry systems compared with monoculture, natural regeneration, and native Caatinga. |
Ano de publicação: |
2020 |
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Bioscience Journal, v. 36, n. 1, p. 1-16, Jan./Fev. 2020. |
DOI: |
http://dx.doi.org/10.14393/BJ-v36n1a2020-42704 |
Idioma: |
Português |
Palavras-Chave: |
Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi spores; B glucosidase. |
Thesaurus NAL: |
Acid phosphatase; Soil management. |
Categoria do assunto: |
S Ciências Biológicas |
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/item/208248/1/Soil-microbiological-properties-and-enzyme-activity.pdf
|
Marc: |
LEADER 00777naa a2200217 a 4500 001 2118270 005 2021-01-08 008 2020 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d 024 7 $ahttp://dx.doi.org/10.14393/BJ-v36n1a2020-42704$2DOI 100 1 $aMIGUEL, D. L. 245 $aSoil microbiological properties and enzyme activity in agroforestry systems compared with monoculture, natural regeneration, and native Caatinga.$h[electronic resource] 260 $c2020 650 $aAcid phosphatase 650 $aSoil management 653 $aArbuscular mycorrhizal fungi spores 653 $aB glucosidase 700 1 $aSILVA, E. M. R. da 700 1 $aSILVA, C. F. da 700 1 $aPEREIRA, M. G. 700 1 $aLEITE, L. F. C. 773 $tBioscience Journal$gv. 36, n. 1, p. 1-16, Jan./Fev. 2020.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
Registro original: |
Embrapa Agrobiologia (CNPAB) |
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
Nenhum registro encontrado para a expressão de busca informada. |
|
|