|
|
Registro Completo |
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Recursos Genéticos e Biotecnologia. |
Data corrente: |
13/04/2017 |
Data da última atualização: |
30/03/2023 |
Tipo da produção científica: |
Resumo em Anais de Congresso |
Autoria: |
SANTOS, R. S. dos; VALLS, J. F. M.; SANTOS, J. N. B. dos; HIRAGI, G. de O.; POLEZ, V. L. P.; SOLL, C. B.; FERREIRA, P.; OLIVEIRA, B.; ROCHA, M.; HOTT, M.; ALARCÃO, G.; ROCHA, T. L. |
Afiliação: |
RENATO SALES DOS SANTOS, Cenargen; JOSE FRANCISCO MONTENEGRO VALLS, Cenargen; JOAO NICANILDO BASTOS DOS SANTOS, Cenargen; GILBERTO DE OLIVEIRA HIRAGI, Cenargen; VERA LUCIA PERUSSI POLEZ, Cenargen; CARLA BECKER SOLL; PAULA FERREIRA; BRUNA OLIVEIRA; MARIAH ROCHA; MARIA HOTT; GUILHERME ALARCÃO, CENTRO UNIVERSITÁRIO DE BRASÍLIA.; THALES LIMA ROCHA, Cenargen. |
Título: |
Prospecção de extratos vegetais nematotóxicos: bioquímica versus recursos genéticos como forma de agregar valor ao germoplasma conservado de arachis. |
Ano de publicação: |
2016 |
Fonte/Imprenta: |
In: CONGRESSO BRASILEIRO DE RECURSOS GENÉTICOS, 4., 2016, Curitiba. Recursos genéticos no Brasil: a base para o desenvolvimento sustentável: anais. Brasília, DF: Sociedade Brasileira de Recursos Genéticos, 2016. |
Idioma: |
Português |
Palavras-Chave: |
BAG Arachis; Nematotóxico; Portal Alelo. |
Categoria do assunto: |
-- |
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/item/158969/1/Anais-CBRG-2016-pg-528.pdf
|
Marc: |
LEADER 00998nam a2200265 a 4500 001 2068482 005 2023-03-30 008 2016 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d 100 1 $aSANTOS, R. S. dos 245 $aProspecção de extratos vegetais nematotóxicos$bbioquímica versus recursos genéticos como forma de agregar valor ao germoplasma conservado de arachis.$h[electronic resource] 260 $aIn: CONGRESSO BRASILEIRO DE RECURSOS GENÉTICOS, 4., 2016, Curitiba. Recursos genéticos no Brasil: a base para o desenvolvimento sustentável: anais. Brasília, DF: Sociedade Brasileira de Recursos Genéticos$c2016 653 $aBAG Arachis 653 $aNematotóxico 653 $aPortal Alelo 700 1 $aVALLS, J. F. M. 700 1 $aSANTOS, J. N. B. dos 700 1 $aHIRAGI, G. de O. 700 1 $aPOLEZ, V. L. P. 700 1 $aSOLL, C. B. 700 1 $aFERREIRA, P. 700 1 $aOLIVEIRA, B. 700 1 $aROCHA, M. 700 1 $aHOTT, M. 700 1 $aALARCÃO, G. 700 1 $aROCHA, T. L.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
Registro original: |
Embrapa Recursos Genéticos e Biotecnologia (CENARGEN) |
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
URL |
Voltar
|
|
| Acesso ao texto completo restrito à biblioteca da Embrapa Agricultura Digital. Para informações adicionais entre em contato com cnptia.biblioteca@embrapa.br. |
Registro Completo
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Agricultura Digital; Embrapa Meio Ambiente. |
Data corrente: |
19/01/2016 |
Data da última atualização: |
24/02/2017 |
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
Circulação/Nível: |
A - 1 |
Autoria: |
SILVA, R. de O.; BARIONI, L. G.; HALL, J. A. J.; MATSUURA, M. F.; ALBERTINI, T. Z.; FERNANDES, F. A.; MORAN, D. |
Afiliação: |
R. DE OLIVEIRA SILVA, University of Edinburgh; LUIS GUSTAVO BARIONI, CNPTIA; J. A. J. HALL, University of Edinburgh; MARILIA IEDA DA S F MATSUURA, CNPMA; TIAGO ZANETT ALBERTINI, USP/ESALQ; FERNANDO ANTONIO FERNANDES, CPAP; D. MORAN, Research Division, SRUC. |
Título: |
Increasing beef production could lower greenhouse gas emissions in Brazil if decoupled from deforestation. |
Ano de publicação: |
2016 |
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Nature Climate Change, v. 6, n. 5, p. 493-497, May 2016. |
DOI: |
10.1038/NCLIMATE2916 |
Idioma: |
Inglês |
Conteúdo: |
Recent debate about agricultural greenhouse gas emissions mitigation highlights trade-os inherent in thewaywe produce and consume food, with increasing scrutiny on emissionsintensive livestock products1-3. Although most research has focused on mitigation through improved productivity4,5, systemic interactions resulting from reduced beef production at the regional level are still unexplored. A detailed optimization model of beef production encompassing pasture degradation and recovery processes, animal and deforestation emissions, soil organic carbon (SOC) dynamics and upstream life-cycle inventory was developed and parameterized for the Brazilian Cerrado. Economic return was maximized considering two alternative scenarios: decoupled livestock-deforestation (DLD), assuming baseline deforestation rates controlled by eective policy; and coupled livestock-deforestation (CLD), where shifting beef demand alters deforestation rates. In DLD, reduced consumption actually leads to less productive beef systems, associated with higher emissions intensities and total emissions, whereas increased production leads to more eficient systems with boosted SOC stocks, reducing both per kilogram and total emissions. Under CLD, increased production leads to 60% higher emissions than in DLD. The results indicate the extent to which deforestation control contributes to sustainable intensification in Cerrado beef systems, and how alternative life-cycle analytical approaches result in significantly diferent emission estimates. MenosRecent debate about agricultural greenhouse gas emissions mitigation highlights trade-os inherent in thewaywe produce and consume food, with increasing scrutiny on emissionsintensive livestock products1-3. Although most research has focused on mitigation through improved productivity4,5, systemic interactions resulting from reduced beef production at the regional level are still unexplored. A detailed optimization model of beef production encompassing pasture degradation and recovery processes, animal and deforestation emissions, soil organic carbon (SOC) dynamics and upstream life-cycle inventory was developed and parameterized for the Brazilian Cerrado. Economic return was maximized considering two alternative scenarios: decoupled livestock-deforestation (DLD), assuming baseline deforestation rates controlled by eective policy; and coupled livestock-deforestation (CLD), where shifting beef demand alters deforestation rates. In DLD, reduced consumption actually leads to less productive beef systems, associated with higher emissions intensities and total emissions, whereas increased production leads to more eficient systems with boosted SOC stocks, reducing both per kilogram and total emissions. Under CLD, increased production leads to 60% higher emissions than in DLD. The results indicate the extent to which deforestation control contributes to sustainable intensification in Cerrado beef systems, and how alternative life-cycle analytical approaches result in significantly d... Mostrar Tudo |
Palavras-Chave: |
Beef production; Emissões de gases. |
Thesagro: |
Efeito Estufa. |
Thesaurus NAL: |
Gas emissions; Greenhouse gas emissions. |
Categoria do assunto: |
X Pesquisa, Tecnologia e Engenharia |
Marc: |
LEADER 02333naa a2200265 a 4500 001 2034370 005 2017-02-24 008 2016 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d 024 7 $a10.1038/NCLIMATE2916$2DOI 100 1 $aSILVA, R. de O. 245 $aIncreasing beef production could lower greenhouse gas emissions in Brazil if decoupled from deforestation.$h[electronic resource] 260 $c2016 520 $aRecent debate about agricultural greenhouse gas emissions mitigation highlights trade-os inherent in thewaywe produce and consume food, with increasing scrutiny on emissionsintensive livestock products1-3. Although most research has focused on mitigation through improved productivity4,5, systemic interactions resulting from reduced beef production at the regional level are still unexplored. A detailed optimization model of beef production encompassing pasture degradation and recovery processes, animal and deforestation emissions, soil organic carbon (SOC) dynamics and upstream life-cycle inventory was developed and parameterized for the Brazilian Cerrado. Economic return was maximized considering two alternative scenarios: decoupled livestock-deforestation (DLD), assuming baseline deforestation rates controlled by eective policy; and coupled livestock-deforestation (CLD), where shifting beef demand alters deforestation rates. In DLD, reduced consumption actually leads to less productive beef systems, associated with higher emissions intensities and total emissions, whereas increased production leads to more eficient systems with boosted SOC stocks, reducing both per kilogram and total emissions. Under CLD, increased production leads to 60% higher emissions than in DLD. The results indicate the extent to which deforestation control contributes to sustainable intensification in Cerrado beef systems, and how alternative life-cycle analytical approaches result in significantly diferent emission estimates. 650 $aGas emissions 650 $aGreenhouse gas emissions 650 $aEfeito Estufa 653 $aBeef production 653 $aEmissões de gases 700 1 $aBARIONI, L. G. 700 1 $aHALL, J. A. J. 700 1 $aMATSUURA, M. F. 700 1 $aALBERTINI, T. Z. 700 1 $aFERNANDES, F. A. 700 1 $aMORAN, D. 773 $tNature Climate Change$gv. 6, n. 5, p. 493-497, May 2016.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
Registro original: |
Embrapa Agricultura Digital (CNPTIA) |
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
Nenhum registro encontrado para a expressão de busca informada. |
|
|