| |
|
|
| Registros recuperados : 34 | |
| 9. |  | ANDRADE, A. R. O.; DORVA, M. E. M. C.; ANDRADE, S. M. O. de; MARQUES, A.; SILVA, B. A. K. da; ANDREOTTI, R. Phlebotomine fauna in the Ponta Porã city: epidemiological importance in border line between Brazil and Paraguay. Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Disease, v. 2, n. 5, p. 362-366, Oct. 2012.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Gado de Corte. |
|    |
| 13. | | ALENCAR, A. M. da S.; OLIVEIRA, V. X. A.; SILVA, E. S. e; PEDROZO, C. A.; BATISTA, K. D. Sobrevivência e crescimento inicial de Castanheira-do-Brasil em Roraima. In: SEMANA NACIONAL DE CIÊNCIA E TECNOLOGIA NO ESTADO DE RORAIMA, 10., 2015, Boa Vista. Resumos... Boa Vista, RR: UERR, 2015.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Roraima. |
|  |
| 14. | | MASCARENHAS, H. A. A.; WUTKE, E. R.; BRAGA, N. R.; TANAKA, R. T.; MIRANDA, M. A. C. Cultura da soja: adubar ou nao com nitrogenio? Separata de O Agronomico, Campinas, v. 53, n. 1, p.46-48, 2001.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Soja. |
| |
| 17. | | McEVORY, T. G.; COULL, G. D.; BROADBENT, P. J.; HUTCHINSON, J. S. M.; SPEAKE, B. K. Fatty acid composition of lipids in immature cattle, pig and sheep oocytes with intact zona pellucida. Journal of Reproduction and Fertility, v. 118, n. 1, p. 163-170, 2000.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Caprinos e Ovinos. |
| |
| 19. | | MANICA, I.; RITZINGER, R.; AZAMBUJA, L. B. de; MUNDSTOCK, E. C.; MARODIN, G. A. B.; KOLLER, O. C. Efeito de seis espacamentos de plantio no 3o. ano de producao do Maracuja Amarelo (Passiflora edulis f. flavicarpa Deg.) em Guaiba/RS Fortaleza: SBF, 1989 p.365-369 In: CONGRESSO BRASILEIRO DE FRUTICULTURA, 10., Fortaleza, CE, 1989. Anais... Fortaleza: Sociedade Brasilira de Fruticultura, 1989, 506p.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Mandioca e Fruticultura. |
| |
| Registros recuperados : 34 | |
|
|
|
 | Acesso ao texto completo restrito à biblioteca da Embrapa Agricultura Digital. Para informações adicionais entre em contato com cnptia.biblioteca@embrapa.br. |
Registro Completo
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Agricultura Digital; Embrapa Meio Ambiente. |
|
Data corrente: |
19/01/2016 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
24/02/2017 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
|
Circulação/Nível: |
A - 1 |
|
Autoria: |
SILVA, R. de O.; BARIONI, L. G.; HALL, J. A. J.; MATSUURA, M. F.; ALBERTINI, T. Z.; FERNANDES, F. A.; MORAN, D. |
|
Afiliação: |
R. DE OLIVEIRA SILVA, University of Edinburgh; LUIS GUSTAVO BARIONI, CNPTIA; J. A. J. HALL, University of Edinburgh; MARILIA IEDA DA S F MATSUURA, CNPMA; TIAGO ZANETT ALBERTINI, USP/ESALQ; FERNANDO ANTONIO FERNANDES, CPAP; D. MORAN, Research Division, SRUC. |
|
Título: |
Increasing beef production could lower greenhouse gas emissions in Brazil if decoupled from deforestation. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2016 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Nature Climate Change, v. 6, n. 5, p. 493-497, May 2016. |
|
DOI: |
10.1038/NCLIMATE2916 |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
Recent debate about agricultural greenhouse gas emissions mitigation highlights trade-os inherent in thewaywe produce and consume food, with increasing scrutiny on emissionsintensive livestock products1-3. Although most research has focused on mitigation through improved productivity4,5, systemic interactions resulting from reduced beef production at the regional level are still unexplored. A detailed optimization model of beef production encompassing pasture degradation and recovery processes, animal and deforestation emissions, soil organic carbon (SOC) dynamics and upstream life-cycle inventory was developed and parameterized for the Brazilian Cerrado. Economic return was maximized considering two alternative scenarios: decoupled livestock-deforestation (DLD), assuming baseline deforestation rates controlled by eective policy; and coupled livestock-deforestation (CLD), where shifting beef demand alters deforestation rates. In DLD, reduced consumption actually leads to less productive beef systems, associated with higher emissions intensities and total emissions, whereas increased production leads to more eficient systems with boosted SOC stocks, reducing both per kilogram and total emissions. Under CLD, increased production leads to 60% higher emissions than in DLD. The results indicate the extent to which deforestation control contributes to sustainable intensification in Cerrado beef systems, and how alternative life-cycle analytical approaches result in significantly diferent emission estimates. MenosRecent debate about agricultural greenhouse gas emissions mitigation highlights trade-os inherent in thewaywe produce and consume food, with increasing scrutiny on emissionsintensive livestock products1-3. Although most research has focused on mitigation through improved productivity4,5, systemic interactions resulting from reduced beef production at the regional level are still unexplored. A detailed optimization model of beef production encompassing pasture degradation and recovery processes, animal and deforestation emissions, soil organic carbon (SOC) dynamics and upstream life-cycle inventory was developed and parameterized for the Brazilian Cerrado. Economic return was maximized considering two alternative scenarios: decoupled livestock-deforestation (DLD), assuming baseline deforestation rates controlled by eective policy; and coupled livestock-deforestation (CLD), where shifting beef demand alters deforestation rates. In DLD, reduced consumption actually leads to less productive beef systems, associated with higher emissions intensities and total emissions, whereas increased production leads to more eficient systems with boosted SOC stocks, reducing both per kilogram and total emissions. Under CLD, increased production leads to 60% higher emissions than in DLD. The results indicate the extent to which deforestation control contributes to sustainable intensification in Cerrado beef systems, and how alternative life-cycle analytical approaches result in significantly d... Mostrar Tudo |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Beef production; Emissões de gases. |
|
Thesagro: |
Efeito Estufa. |
|
Thesaurus NAL: |
Gas emissions; Greenhouse gas emissions. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
X Pesquisa, Tecnologia e Engenharia |
|
Marc: |
LEADER 02333naa a2200265 a 4500
001 2034370
005 2017-02-24
008 2016 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
024 7 $a10.1038/NCLIMATE2916$2DOI
100 1 $aSILVA, R. de O.
245 $aIncreasing beef production could lower greenhouse gas emissions in Brazil if decoupled from deforestation.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2016
520 $aRecent debate about agricultural greenhouse gas emissions mitigation highlights trade-os inherent in thewaywe produce and consume food, with increasing scrutiny on emissionsintensive livestock products1-3. Although most research has focused on mitigation through improved productivity4,5, systemic interactions resulting from reduced beef production at the regional level are still unexplored. A detailed optimization model of beef production encompassing pasture degradation and recovery processes, animal and deforestation emissions, soil organic carbon (SOC) dynamics and upstream life-cycle inventory was developed and parameterized for the Brazilian Cerrado. Economic return was maximized considering two alternative scenarios: decoupled livestock-deforestation (DLD), assuming baseline deforestation rates controlled by eective policy; and coupled livestock-deforestation (CLD), where shifting beef demand alters deforestation rates. In DLD, reduced consumption actually leads to less productive beef systems, associated with higher emissions intensities and total emissions, whereas increased production leads to more eficient systems with boosted SOC stocks, reducing both per kilogram and total emissions. Under CLD, increased production leads to 60% higher emissions than in DLD. The results indicate the extent to which deforestation control contributes to sustainable intensification in Cerrado beef systems, and how alternative life-cycle analytical approaches result in significantly diferent emission estimates.
650 $aGas emissions
650 $aGreenhouse gas emissions
650 $aEfeito Estufa
653 $aBeef production
653 $aEmissões de gases
700 1 $aBARIONI, L. G.
700 1 $aHALL, J. A. J.
700 1 $aMATSUURA, M. F.
700 1 $aALBERTINI, T. Z.
700 1 $aFERNANDES, F. A.
700 1 $aMORAN, D.
773 $tNature Climate Change$gv. 6, n. 5, p. 493-497, May 2016.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Agricultura Digital (CNPTIA) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
| Nenhum registro encontrado para a expressão de busca informada. |
|
|
