| |
|
|
 | Acesso ao texto completo restrito à biblioteca da Embrapa Caprinos e Ovinos. Para informações adicionais entre em contato com cnpc.biblioteca@embrapa.br. |
|
Registro Completo |
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Caprinos e Ovinos. |
|
Data corrente: |
27/08/2002 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
24/08/2023 |
|
Autoria: |
O'MARA, F. P.; COYLE, J. E.; DRENNAN, M. J.; YOUNG, P.; CAFFREY, P. J. |
|
Título: |
A comparison of digestibility of some concentrate feed ingredients in cattle and sheep. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
1999 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Animal Feed Science and Technology, v. 81, n. 1/2, p. 167-174, Sep. 1999. |
|
DOI: |
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-8401(99)00082-6 |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
Abstract: An experiment was carried out to compare the digestibility of five concentrate ingredients (barley, beet pulp, citrus pulp, maize gluten feed and grain screenings) in cattle or sheep, fed at ?1.2 maintenance. Four wether sheep and four steers were fed each concentrate, which comprised ?800 g/kg of the dietary dry matter (DM). The remaining 200 g/kg was a hay/soyabean meal mixture whose digestibility was determined simultaneously in another four sheep and cattle. Following diet introduction and adaptation, faeces were collected for a 10-day period. Across diets, there was no difference (p >0.05) between sheep and cattle in digestibility of organic matter (OM, 0.784 and 0.78, respectively, standard error of the difference (s.e.d.), 0.0049), crude protein (0.586 and 0.577, respectively, s.e.d. 0.0192), or neutral detergent fibre (0.632 and 0.628, respectively, s.e.d. 0.0116). However, cattle digested the OM (0.749 vs. 0.724, p <0.05, s.e.d. 0.0106) of maize gluten feed better than sheep, but there were no significant differences (p >0.05) between sheep and cattle with any of the other four feeds. These results do not support previous conclusions that sheep digest concentrates better than cattle, but they do suggest that there are differences within specific feeds. |
|
Thesagro: |
Alimento Concentrado; Bovino; Digestibilidade; Nutrição Animal; Ovino. |
|
Thesaurus Nal: |
Cattle; Digestibility; Ruminant nutrition; Sheep. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
L Ciência Animal e Produtos de Origem Animal |
|
Marc: |
LEADER 02146naa a2200289 a 4500
001 1528546
005 2023-08-24
008 1999 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
024 7 $ahttps://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-8401(99)00082-6$2DOI
100 1 $aO'MARA, F. P.
245 $aA comparison of digestibility of some concentrate feed ingredients in cattle and sheep.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c1999
520 $aAbstract: An experiment was carried out to compare the digestibility of five concentrate ingredients (barley, beet pulp, citrus pulp, maize gluten feed and grain screenings) in cattle or sheep, fed at ?1.2 maintenance. Four wether sheep and four steers were fed each concentrate, which comprised ?800 g/kg of the dietary dry matter (DM). The remaining 200 g/kg was a hay/soyabean meal mixture whose digestibility was determined simultaneously in another four sheep and cattle. Following diet introduction and adaptation, faeces were collected for a 10-day period. Across diets, there was no difference (p >0.05) between sheep and cattle in digestibility of organic matter (OM, 0.784 and 0.78, respectively, standard error of the difference (s.e.d.), 0.0049), crude protein (0.586 and 0.577, respectively, s.e.d. 0.0192), or neutral detergent fibre (0.632 and 0.628, respectively, s.e.d. 0.0116). However, cattle digested the OM (0.749 vs. 0.724, p <0.05, s.e.d. 0.0106) of maize gluten feed better than sheep, but there were no significant differences (p >0.05) between sheep and cattle with any of the other four feeds. These results do not support previous conclusions that sheep digest concentrates better than cattle, but they do suggest that there are differences within specific feeds.
650 $aCattle
650 $aDigestibility
650 $aRuminant nutrition
650 $aSheep
650 $aAlimento Concentrado
650 $aBovino
650 $aDigestibilidade
650 $aNutrição Animal
650 $aOvino
700 1 $aCOYLE, J. E.
700 1 $aDRENNAN, M. J.
700 1 $aYOUNG, P.
700 1 $aCAFFREY, P. J.
773 $tAnimal Feed Science and Technology$gv. 81, n. 1/2, p. 167-174, Sep. 1999.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Caprinos e Ovinos (CNPC) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
URL |
Voltar
|
|
|
| Registros recuperados : 4 | |
| 1. |  | SCHNEIDER, S.; CASSOL, A. P.; PITALUGA, C.; DINIZ, F. H.; NEVES, J. A. S. das; SILVA, L. de J. de S. O acesso dos agricultores familiares aos mercados alimentares: políticas públicas, autonomia e segurança alimentar no Brasil. In: CONGRESSO DA SOCIEDADE BRASILEIRA DE ECONOMIA, ADMINISTRAÇÃO E SOCIOLOGIA RURAL, 61., 2023, Piracicaba. Agropecuária do futuro: tecnologia, sustentabilidade e a segurança alimentar: anais. Piracicaba: ESALQ/USP, 2023.| Tipo: Artigo em Anais de Congresso |
| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Amazônia Ocidental; Embrapa Gado de Leite. |
|    |
| 2. | | AQUINO, J. R. de; SILVA, C. B. de C.; NEVES, J. A. S. das; LIMA, J. R. F. de; SCHNEIDER, S. Articulação de políticas para a superação da pobreza rural: um estudo das interfaces entre o programa bolsa família e as políticas de inclusão produtiva no Nordeste e no Sul do Brasil. Revista Econômica do Nordeste, Fortaleza, v. 48, n. 4, p. 155-173, out./dez., 2017.| Tipo: Artigo em Periódico Indexado | Circulação/Nível: B - 2 |
| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Semiárido. |
| |
| Registros recuperados : 4 | |
|
| Nenhum registro encontrado para a expressão de busca informada. |
|
|
