| |
|
|
| Registros recuperados : 19 | |
| 5. |  | TORRECILHA, S.; GONÇALVES, R. M.; LAPS, R. R.; TOMAS, W. M.; MARANHÃO, H. L.; ROQUE, F. de O. Registros de espécies de mamíferos e aves ameaçadas em Mato Grosso do Sul com ênfase no Sistema Estadual de Unidades de Conservação. Iheringia, Série Zoologia, v. 107, supl., p. 1-7, 2017.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Pantanal. |
|    |
| 6. | | TOMAS, W. M.; GARCIA, L. C.; ROQUE, F. de O.; LOURIVAL, R.; DIAS, F. A.; SALIS, S. M.; MOURAO, G. Resumo executivo: análise dos conceitos "mesma identidade ecológica", "equivalência ecológica" e "offsetting" para compensação de Reserva Legal. Corumbá: Embrapa Pantanal, 2020. 4 p. (Embrapa Pantanal. Comunicado Técnico, 113).| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Pantanal. |
|  |
| 7. | | MARTINS, C. de A.; ROQUE, F. de O.; SANTOS, B. A.; FERREIRA, V. L.; STRUSSMANN, C.; TOMAS, W. M. What shapes the phylogenetic structure of anuran communities in a seasonal environment? The influence of determinism at regional scale to stochasticity or antagonistic forces at local scale. Plos One, v. 10, n. 6, p. 1-14, 2015.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Pantanal. |
| |
| 8. | | TOMAS, W. M.; GARCIA, L. C.; ROQUE, F. de O.; LOURIVAL, R.; DIAS, F.; SALIS, S. M. de; MOURAO, G. de M. Análise dos conceitos de 'mesma identidade ecológica', 'equivalência ecológica' e 'offsetting' para compensação de Reserva Legal. Corumbá: Embrapa Pantanal, 2018. 23 p. (Embrapa Pantanal. Documentos, 159)| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Pantanal. |
| |
| 9. | | LOUZADA, R. O.; BERGIER, I.; MCGLUE, M. M.; ROQUE, F. de O.; RASBOLD, G.; DOMINGOS-LUZ, L.; LO, E.; ASSINE, M. L. Fluvial avulsions influence soil fertility in the Pantanal wetlands (Brazil). Science of the Total Environment, v. 926, 172127, May 2024.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Agricultura Digital. |
| |
| 10. | | GUERRA, A.; BOLZAN, F.; LOUZADA, R.; ALMAGRO, A.; COLMAN, C. B.; NEVES, M. O.; OLIVEIRA, P. T. S. de; GARCIA, L. C.; BERGIER, I.; ROQUE, F. de O. O futuro da BAP. In: RABELO, A. P. C.; SOUZA, M. G. de (org.). Bacia do Alto Paraguai: uma viagem no tempo. Brasília, DF: Ibict, 2021. p. 66-89. Cap. 4.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Pantanal. |
| |
| 12. | | GARCIA, L. C.; SZABO, J. K.; ROQUE, F. de O.; PEREIRA, A. de M. M.; CUNHA, C. N. da; DAMASCENO JÚNIOR, G. A.; MORATO, R. G.; TOMAS, W. M.; LIBONATI, R.; RIBEIRO, D. B. Record-breaking wildfires in the world's largest continuous tropical wetland: Integrative fire management is urgently needed for both biodiversity and humans. Journal of Environmental Management, v. 293, 112870, 2021.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Pantanal. |
| |
| 13. | | BUSS, D. F.; ROQUE, F. de O.; SONODA, K. C.; MEDINA JUNIOR, P. B.; STEFANES, M.; IMBIMBO, H. R. V.; KUHLMANN, M. L.; LAMPARELLI, M. C.; OLIVEIRA, L. G.; MOLOZZI, J.; CAMPOS, M. de C. S.; JUNQUEIRA, M. V.; LIGEIRO, R.; MOULTON, T. P.; HAMADA, N.; MUGNAI, R.; BAPTISTA, D. F. Macroinvertebrados aquáticos como bioindicadores no processo de licenciamento ambiental no Brasil Biodiversidade Brasileira, Brasília, v. 6, n. 1, p. 100-113, 2016.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Meio Ambiente. |
| |
| 14. | | BOLZAN, F. P.; PEREIRA, G. M. F.; TOMAS, W. M.; LOURIVAL, R.; SABINO, J.; SOUZA, F. L.; VALENTE NETO, F.; CHIARAVALLOTI, R. M.; GARCIA, L. C.; GUERRA, A.; NICOLA, R. D. N.; GARCIA, A. da S.; FERNANDES, J. F. A.; SANTOS, C. C.; SCUR, M. C.; MARTINS, P. I.; BERNARDINO, C.; ROQUE, F. DE O. Monetary value of the ecosystem services of the Pantanal and its surroundings: first approximations and perspectives. In: DAMASCENO-JUNIOR, G. A.; POTT, A. (Ed.). Flora and Vegetation of the Pantanal Wetland. Springer Nature Switzerland AG: Cham, 2021. (Plant and Vegetation, 18). p. 767-783. Cap. 21.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Pantanal. |
| |
| 15. | | DAMASCENO JUNIOR, G. A.; ROQUE, F. de O.; GARCIA, L. C.; RIBEIRO, D. B.; TOMAS, W. M.; DIAS, E. S.; DIAS, F. A.; LIBONATI, R.; RODRIGUES, J. A.; SANTOS, F. L. M.; PEREIRA, A. de M. M.; SOUZA, E. B. de; REIS, L. K.; OLIVEIRA, M. da R.; SOUZA, A. H. de A.; PINEDA, D. A. M.; FERREIRA, B. H. dos S.; BORTOLOTTO, I. M.; POTT, A. Lessons to be learned from the wildfire catastrophe of 2020 in the Pantanal wetland. Wetland Science & Practice, v. 38, n. 2, p. 107-115, april 2021.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Pantanal. |
| |
| 16. | | ROQUE, F. de O.; GUERRA. A.; JOHNSON, M.; PADOVANI, C. R.; CORBI, J.; COVICH, A. P.; EATON, D.; TOMAS, W. M.; VALENTE NETO, F.; BORGES, A. C. P.; PINHO, A.; BARUFATII, A.; CRISPIM, B. do A.; GUARIENTO, R. D.; ANDRADE, M. H. da S.; REZENDE FILHO, A. T.; PORTELA, R.; OLIVEIRA, M. D. de; SILVA, J. C. S. da; BERNADINO, C.; SA, E. F. G. G. de; ESTRELA, P. C.; DESBIEZ, A.; ROSA, I. M. D.; YON, L. Simulating land use changes, sediment yields, and pesticide use in the Upper Paraguay River Basin: implications for conservation of the Pantanal wetland. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, v. 314, 107405, 2021.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Pantanal. |
| |
| 17. | | WANTZEN, K. M.; ASSINE, M. L.; BORTOLOTTO, I. M.; CALHEIROS, D. F.; CAMPOS, Z.; CATELLA, A. C.; CHIARAVALOTTI, R. M.; COLLISCHONN, W.; COUTO, E. G.; CUNHA, C. N. da; DAMASCENO-JUNIOR, G. A.; SILVA, C. J. da; EBERHARD, A.; EBERT, A.; FIGUEIREDO, D. M. de; FRIEDLANDER, M.; GARCIA, L. C.; GIRARD, P.; HAMILTON, S. K.; IKEDA-CASTRILLON, S.; LIBONATI, R.; LOURIVAL, R.; MACEDO, H. de A.; MARCATO JUNIOR, J.; MATEUS, L.; MORATO, R. G.; MOURAO, G.; MUNIZ, C. C.; NUNES, A. V.; OLIVEIRA, M. D. de; OLIVERIA, M. da R.; OLIVEIRA JUNIOR, E. S.; PADOVANI, C. R.; PENHA, J.; RIBEIRO, D. B.; ROQUE, F. de O.; SILVA, A.; SORIANO, B. M. A.; SOUSA JUNIOR, W. C.; TOMAS, W. M.; TORTATO, F. R.; URBANETZ, C. The end of an entire biome? World's largest wetland, the Pantanal, is menaced by the Hidrovia project which is uncertain to sustainably support large-scale navigation. Science of The Total Environment, v. 908, 167751, 2024.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Pantanal. |
| |
| 18. | | SUGAI, L. S. M.; COSTA-PEREIRA, R.; QUINTEIRO, J. M. O.; TORRECILHA, S.; ERIKSSON, A.; NUNES, A. P.; KEUROGHLIAN, A.; ARAUJO, A. C.; PARANHOS FILHO, A. C.; DESBIEZ, A. L. J.; POTT, A.; SANTOS, C. F.; FERREIRA, C. M. M.; RIBEIRO, D. B.; EATON, D. P.; SCREMIN-DIAS, E.; CORRÊA, EL. C.; BURKHARDT, E.; FISCHER, E.; AYRES, F. M.; MARTINS, F. I.; ALVES, F. M.; SEVERO-NETO, F.; SOUZA, F. L.; PAULA, G. A. DE.; SOUZA, G. N. de; SEIXAS, G. H. F.; DALPONTI, G.; BARROS, G. M. de; GRACIOLLI, G.; GIMÊNES JUNIOR, H.; ILHA, I. M. N.; SUGAI, J. L. M. M.; LONGO, J. M.; SABINO, J.; CORDEIRO, L. M.; NASCIMENTO, L. N.; TENCATT, L. F. C.; BUENO, M. L.; RODRIGUES, M. E.; BENITES, M.; SILVA, M.; GODOI, M. N.; SILVEIRA, M.; DELATORRE, M.; RIBEIRO, M. C.; GUEDES, N. M. R.; CUNHA, N. L. da; FROEHLICH, O.; MEDICI, P.; MEDINA JUNIOR, P. B.; SOUZA, P. R. de; FERREIRA, R. P.; LOURIVAL, R. F. F.; GAMARRA, R. M.; BORGHEZAN, R.; LAPS, R. R.; ROCHA, S. B. da; DULEBA, S.; MAMEDE, S.; ESCAPINATI, S. C.; SINANI, T. R. F.; FERREIRA, V. L.; TOMAS, W. M.; SÚAREZ, Y. R.; ROQUE, F. de O. Incorporating biodiversity expert knowledge in landscape conservation planning: a case study involving the Pantanal. In: SIMPÓSIO DE GEOTECNOLOGIAS NO PANTANAL, 5., 2014, Campo Grande, MS. Anais... São José dos Campos: INPE, 2014. p. 544-553. 1 CD-ROM. Geopantanal 2014.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Pantanal. |
| |
| 19. | | TOMAS, W. M.; ROQUE, F. de O.; MORATO, R. G.; MÉDICI, P. E.; CHIARAVALLOTI, R. M.; TORTATO, F. R.; PENHA, J. M. F.; IZZO, T. J.; GARCIA, L. C.; LOURIVAL, R. F. F.; GIRARD, P.; ALBUQUERQUE, N. R.; ALMEIDA-GOMES, M.; ANDRADE, M. H. DA S.; ARAÚJO, F. A. S.; ARAÚJO, A. C.; ARRUDA, E. C. DE.; ASSUNÇÃO, V. A.; BATTIROLA, L. D.; BENITES, M.; BOLZAN, F. P.; BOOCK, J. C.; BORTOLOTTO, I. M.; BRASIL, M. DA S.; CAMILO, A. R.; CAMPOS, Z.; CARNIELLO, M. A.; CATELLA, A. C.; CHEIDA, C. C.; CRAWSHAW JR. P. G.; CRISPIM, S. M. A.; DAMASCENO JUNIOR, G. A.; DESBIEZ, A. L. J.; DIAS, F. A.; EATON, D. P.; FAGGIONI, G. P.; FARINACCIO, M. A.; FERNANDES, J. F. A.; FERREIRA, V. L.; FISCHER, E. A.; FRAGOSO, C. E.; FREITAS, G. O.; GALVANI, F.; GARCIA, A. S.; GARCIA, C. M.; GRACIOLLI, G.; GUARIENTO, R. D.; GUEDES, N. M. R.; GUERRA, A.; HERRERA, H. M.; HOOGESTEIJN, R.; IKEDA, S. C.; JULIANO, R. S.; KANTEK, D. L. Z. K.; KEUROGHLIAN, A.; LACERDA, A. C. R.; LACERDA, A. L. R.; LANDEIRO, V. L.; LAPS, R. R.; LAYME, V.; LEIMGRUBER, P.; ROCHA, F. L.; MAMEDE, S.; MARQUES, D. K. S.; MARQUES, M. I.; MATEUS, L. A. F.; MORAES R. N.; MOREIRA, T. A.; MOURAO, G.; NICOLA, R. D.; NOGUEIRA, D. G.; NUNES, A. P.; CUNHA, C. N. DA.; OLIVEIRA, M. D. de; OLIVEIRA, M. R.; PAGGI, G. M.; PELLEGRIN, A. O.; PEREIRA, G. M. F.; PERES, I. A. H. F. S.; PINHO, J. B.; POTT, A.; PROVETE, D. B.; REIS, V. D. A. dos; REIS, L. K. DOS; RENAUD, P. C.; RIBEIRO, D. B.; ROSSETTO, O. C.; SABINO, J.; RUMIZ, D.; SALIS, S. M.; SANTANA, D. J.; SANTOS, S. A.; SARTORI, Â. L.; SATO, M.; SCHUCHMANN, K-L.; SCREMIN-DIAS, E.; SEIXAS, G. H. F.; SEVERO-NETO, F.; SIGRIST, M. R.; SILVA, A.; SILVA, C. J.; SIQUEIRA, A. L.; SORIANO, B. M. A.; SOUSA, L. M.; SOUZA, F. L.; STRUSSMANN, C.; SUGAI, L. S. M.; TOCANTINS, N.; URBANETZ, C.; VALENTE-NETO, F.; VIANA, D. P.; YANOSKY, A.; JUNK, W. J. Sustainability Agenda for the Pantanal Wetland: Perspectives on a Collaborative Interface for Science, Policy, and Decision-Making. Tropical Conservation Science, v. 12, p. 1-30, 2019.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Pantanal. |
| |
| Registros recuperados : 19 | |
|
|
|
Registro Completo
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Pantanal. |
|
Data corrente: |
17/07/2018 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
12/03/2019 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
|
Circulação/Nível: |
B - 5 |
|
Autoria: |
CHRISTIAN, K. T.; TSITOH, V. C.; PAUL, T. J.; YVONNE, T. A. M.; JULIANO, R. S.; LISITA, F. O.; ARNAUD, H. B.; RAPHAEL, K. J.; FUALEFAC, D. H.; KENNETH, N. |
|
Afiliação: |
KEAMBOU TIAMBO CHRISTIAN, University of Buea, Cameroon; VUKIESU CHRISTIAN TSITOH, University of Buea, Cameroon; TOUKALA JEAN PAUL, University of Buea, Cameroon; TEDONGMO ANNIE MARIE YVONNE, Institut National Agronomique de Tunisie, Tunis, Tunisia; RAQUEL SOARES JULIANO, CPAP; FREDERICO OLIVIERI LISITA, CPAP; HAKOTOUKO BLAISE ARNAUD, Catholic University Institute of BueaBuea, Cameroon; KANA JEAN RAPHAEL, University of Dschang, Cameroon; DEFANG HENRY FUALEFAC, University of Buea, Cameroon; NDAMUKONG KENNETH, University of Buea, Cameroon. |
|
Título: |
Reproductive Performances of a cameroonian dual-purpose local chicken strain fed pelleted diets containing graded levels of cassava and sweet potato meal as an energy substitute for maize. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2018 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Journal of World's Poultry Research, v. 8, n. 1, p. 18-24, mar. 2018. |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
The continuous rising price of maize due to an increasing competition between humans and livestock requires palliative measures to sustain animal production. cassava-sweet potato meal combination can be used as a substitute for maize in feeding chicken. This study aimed at improving poultry productivity through the enhancement of the reproductive performances of Cameroon Kabir chickens fed pelleted diets of graded levels inclusion of cassava-sweet potato meal as an energy substitute for maize.315 Kabir chickens (270 hens and 45 rosters) of 23 weeks of age, were randomly allocated to five treatments T1, T2, T3, T4 and T5 with graded levels of cassava-sweet potato meal as energy substitute for maize, and eggs were collected for the evaluation of laying performances and characteristics. Fertility and hatchability were also evaluated across four successive batches of incubations. The eggs? weight was significantly (P<0.05) different between treatments at weeks 2, 4, 5 and 12, highly significant (P<0.01) at week 9, and very highly significant (P<0.001) at week 6, 7, 8 and 10. The highest number of eggs laid, egg weight and mass were recorded in chicken receiving 25% (T2) replacement of maize with cassava and sweet potato meal, followed by T4 (75%), T5 (100%), T3 (50%) while T1, receiving control diet without cassava and sweet potato meal performed less for all the parameters. Generally, the trend of the feed conversion ratio was decreasing with increasing the inclusion level of cassava and sweet potato meal. The egg index showed significant differences in weeks 6 and 12, while week 2 showed high significant difference between the treatments. T2 (25%) recorded the highest fertility, while animals receiving control ration without maize substitution recorded the highest hatchability. In general, incorporation of 25% of fifty-fifty percent weight to weight of cassava and sweet potato meal can be recommended for reproduction in chicken without affecting neither the hatchability nor the physical characteristics of the eggs, though hatchability will require better attention. MenosThe continuous rising price of maize due to an increasing competition between humans and livestock requires palliative measures to sustain animal production. cassava-sweet potato meal combination can be used as a substitute for maize in feeding chicken. This study aimed at improving poultry productivity through the enhancement of the reproductive performances of Cameroon Kabir chickens fed pelleted diets of graded levels inclusion of cassava-sweet potato meal as an energy substitute for maize.315 Kabir chickens (270 hens and 45 rosters) of 23 weeks of age, were randomly allocated to five treatments T1, T2, T3, T4 and T5 with graded levels of cassava-sweet potato meal as energy substitute for maize, and eggs were collected for the evaluation of laying performances and characteristics. Fertility and hatchability were also evaluated across four successive batches of incubations. The eggs? weight was significantly (P<0.05) different between treatments at weeks 2, 4, 5 and 12, highly significant (P<0.01) at week 9, and very highly significant (P<0.001) at week 6, 7, 8 and 10. The highest number of eggs laid, egg weight and mass were recorded in chicken receiving 25% (T2) replacement of maize with cassava and sweet potato meal, followed by T4 (75%), T5 (100%), T3 (50%) while T1, receiving control diet without cassava and sweet potato meal performed less for all the parameters. Generally, the trend of the feed conversion ratio was decreasing with increasing the inclusion level of c... Mostrar Tudo |
|
Thesagro: |
Galinha; Produção Animal; Reprodução Animal. |
|
Thesaurus NAL: |
Animal reproduction; Chickens; Poultry production. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
L Ciência Animal e Produtos de Origem Animal |
|
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/item/179894/1/Reproductive-Performances-of-a-Cameroonian-Dual-Purpose-Local-chicken.pdf
|
|
Marc: |
LEADER 03075naa a2200301 a 4500
001 2093352
005 2019-03-12
008 2018 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
100 1 $aCHRISTIAN, K. T.
245 $aReproductive Performances of a cameroonian dual-purpose local chicken strain fed pelleted diets containing graded levels of cassava and sweet potato meal as an energy substitute for maize.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2018
520 $aThe continuous rising price of maize due to an increasing competition between humans and livestock requires palliative measures to sustain animal production. cassava-sweet potato meal combination can be used as a substitute for maize in feeding chicken. This study aimed at improving poultry productivity through the enhancement of the reproductive performances of Cameroon Kabir chickens fed pelleted diets of graded levels inclusion of cassava-sweet potato meal as an energy substitute for maize.315 Kabir chickens (270 hens and 45 rosters) of 23 weeks of age, were randomly allocated to five treatments T1, T2, T3, T4 and T5 with graded levels of cassava-sweet potato meal as energy substitute for maize, and eggs were collected for the evaluation of laying performances and characteristics. Fertility and hatchability were also evaluated across four successive batches of incubations. The eggs? weight was significantly (P<0.05) different between treatments at weeks 2, 4, 5 and 12, highly significant (P<0.01) at week 9, and very highly significant (P<0.001) at week 6, 7, 8 and 10. The highest number of eggs laid, egg weight and mass were recorded in chicken receiving 25% (T2) replacement of maize with cassava and sweet potato meal, followed by T4 (75%), T5 (100%), T3 (50%) while T1, receiving control diet without cassava and sweet potato meal performed less for all the parameters. Generally, the trend of the feed conversion ratio was decreasing with increasing the inclusion level of cassava and sweet potato meal. The egg index showed significant differences in weeks 6 and 12, while week 2 showed high significant difference between the treatments. T2 (25%) recorded the highest fertility, while animals receiving control ration without maize substitution recorded the highest hatchability. In general, incorporation of 25% of fifty-fifty percent weight to weight of cassava and sweet potato meal can be recommended for reproduction in chicken without affecting neither the hatchability nor the physical characteristics of the eggs, though hatchability will require better attention.
650 $aAnimal reproduction
650 $aChickens
650 $aPoultry production
650 $aGalinha
650 $aProdução Animal
650 $aReprodução Animal
700 1 $aTSITOH, V. C.
700 1 $aPAUL, T. J.
700 1 $aYVONNE, T. A. M.
700 1 $aJULIANO, R. S.
700 1 $aLISITA, F. O.
700 1 $aARNAUD, H. B.
700 1 $aRAPHAEL, K. J.
700 1 $aFUALEFAC, D. H.
700 1 $aKENNETH, N.
773 $tJournal of World's Poultry Research$gv. 8, n. 1, p. 18-24, mar. 2018.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Pantanal (CPAP) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
| Nenhum registro encontrado para a expressão de busca informada. |
|
|
